Survey Results

FirstPrevNext

Re: College is behind the technology Michael A. Barnhart14-Jul-05 9:26 Michael A. Barnhart 14-Jul-05 9:26  Bob Stanneveld wrote: College is behind the technology So what, A good school will teach you to think and expose you to ideas (language, art, etc..) Make sure you can understand concepts and basis for what ever technology you run across. I do not mind getting old. It beats all the other options that I can think of. Re: College is behind the technology Bob Stanneveld14-Jul-05 21:41 Bob Stanneveld 14-Jul-05 21:41  Michael A. Barnhart wrote: So what, A good school will teach you to think and expose you to ideas (language, art, etc..) If I would have to bet my money on the education that I get in college, I would know only little more about constructors and garbage collection in Java. Oh wait, they also tought me the UML notation . They didn't teach me how to get a decent design for an application. In college they also tend to focus more on the programming itself instead of the complete process, which is the interesting part.. Behind every great black man...             ... is the police. - Conspiracy brother Blog[^] Re: College is behind the technology Timothy the lion15-Jul-05 11:48 Timothy the lion 15-Jul-05 11:48  im am 14 with no experence so don't trust me on this BUT I learned about architecture and design by finding a bunce of architectures and finding there good idea(usualy not idea's take netbeans ide forinstance nbm is great but paths are way too limited and it is hard to edit core stuf like the code editor. mfc's doc view architecture is cool BUT serialisation was idiotic and activex\owl was implamented badly making plugin's hard to write it was a good architecture but implimented badly .net is very abstract this makes for infinite fexibliulty but get's you down almost to c level though it does have good ide's some programs have no architectur and you kinda have to globe thing's on herte and there my education 8'th grade - 6th,1st ie my 6th and 1st grade teachers should be shot i have some experience in c++ java more in c# les in vb ect ect even less in asm more in snoblo and logo mostly self taugh though my dad taught me about variables why would you need colledge when you have the internet? hit next and pray Re: College is behind the technology Bob Stanneveld17-Jul-05 23:33 Bob Stanneveld 17-Jul-05 23:33  snobol wrote: why would you need colledge when you have the internet? Language for example. I don't know your origin, but your english is pretty bad. Pardon me if you're native language is not english. You also talk about design, but designing real applications (not the smallest tools) takes more than just a library like MFC. If you develop a large application with MFC, or any library, as it's starting point, you set up your own downfall. Designing an application is an art by itself. If you really want to learn how to design an application, do some google searches about tiered applications, tiers, n-tier There are also a lot of other design methods around. Have fun! Behind every great black man...             ... is the police. - Conspiracy brother Blog[^] Re: College is behind the technology Timothy the lion18-Jul-05 8:41 Timothy the lion 18-Jul-05 8:41  I am a native speaker of English I just didn’t try very hard. I know I don’t have great English but that is for a lack of trying not a lack of being taught. My goal with language is to communicate not to sound professional. I was joking when I said “why would you need college when you have the Internet?” My point of my post is that I believe I have a fairly solid understanding of how to design an application well. I overlooked the fact that what I think of mfc is actually the Microsoft Visual studio 97 mfc application template. My point was that by looking at open source examples like the netbeans IDE I can get a fairly good understand of what to do and what not to do when designing an application. Does that clarify my post? PS is my English better when I do try? hit next and pray Re: College is behind the technology Bob Stanneveld18-Jul-05 22:12 Bob Stanneveld 18-Jul-05 22:12  snobol wrote: Does that clarify my post? This makes me undestand your post snobol wrote: PS is my English better when I do try? It sure is. The point is that if I read some poorly written english posts, I have to try real hard to undestand it. Since there are many people here who do not speak english as their native language (including myself), I have to live with it. Behind every great black man...             ... is the police. - Conspiracy brother Blog[^] Re: College is behind the technology Toby Opferman17-Jul-05 13:33 Toby Opferman 17-Jul-05 13:33  The university definately is not going to teach you everything, it's impossible. It's really there just to expose you to something. If anyone thinks they can just go to school and once they're done they're done that's all they need to know is definately overlooking. There are two things I think about college and both are somewhat related. 1. Exposure to things you may not have had before. If someone is new to computers, they could for the first time be exposed to C. Now if they stop there, they obviously are doing themselves a harm. However, now that they are introduced after the course they should continue if that's what they want to do. There are also things that are redundant though if you have learned on your own. 2. Introduction and doing things you wouldn't usually do on your own. They may expose you to something you may not have investigated or implemented on your own for example. You may love games so you only program games, perhaps in school you take a compiler writing class. Perhaps this is something you would not investigate on your own however now that you're forced to you add a little bit of knowledge to your plate. You mention UML, perhaps that's something you wouldn't have learned on your own, so you do pick up things here and there and you get to choose if you want to follow that path more or less. They generally expose you to the basics and a little beyond. The courses are usually written towards those who have never programmed and that may be the problem. It takes a long time to get up to speed to be able to perform certain tasks, so perhaps that's another reason they are slower. Also, most college are geared towards the general population. The average IQ is only 100 so the general population is dumb by a whole. So if you had an advanced C course, perhaps 90% of the students who would currently take it would fail. Perhaps those are the students who would really be IT guys who only put together small applications every now and then for login scripts or something. So, perhaps they really need to seperate "Computer Science" to gear it more towards developers, some colleges do have "Software Eng." courses for example. They should also have difficulty levels for those courses so the faster paced people can be with other faster paced people while the slower people can be with the slower people. 8bc7c0ec02c0e404c0cc0680f7018827ebee Re: College is behind the technology Bob Stanneveld17-Jul-05 23:25 Bob Stanneveld 17-Jul-05 23:25  Toby Opferman wrote: So, perhaps they really need to seperate "Computer Science" to gear it more towards developers, some colleges do have "Software Eng." courses for example. They should also have difficulty levels for those courses so the faster paced people can be with other faster paced people while the slower people can be with the slower people. This is what I was thinking too. They should introduce difficulty levels and have a few courses for the "expert" students. The difference between what the business community ask of newly graduates and what newly graduates have to offer here is huge! Since they wan't to teach everybody a little bit of everything, the teach almost nothing. I mean, how redundant are 4 classes about syntax of 4 different languages? Once you know the most difficult one, the rest becomes a few hours of reading.. Anyway, nothing is perfect and nothing ever will be. Behind every great black man...             ... is the police. - Conspiracy brother Blog[^] Self taught, all the way Christian Graus12-Jul-05 18:02 Christian Graus 12-Jul-05 18:02  I dropped out of high school, because I did no homework ( too busy playing with computers ). I guess that all worked out OK for me then.... Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Re: Self taught, all the way Ray Cassick12-Jul-05 19:36 Ray Cassick 12-Jul-05 19:36  I failed 2 years for the same reason. Not enough time to do homework when I was building and programming computers Teachers never did understand me. That and the age old fallacy that you can't be good in computers unless you are good in math. George Carlin wrote: "Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things." Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: If the physicists find a universal theory describing the laws of universe, I'm sure the a**hole constant will be an integral part of that theory. My Blog[^] Re: Self taught, all the way WillemM13-Jul-05 2:04 WillemM 13-Jul-05 2:04  I am absolutely not good at math. But still I do a study Computer Science. Two more years to go and I will have my bachelor degree WM. What about weapons of mass-construction? Re: Self taught, all the way SimonS13-Jul-05 7:14 SimonS 13-Jul-05 7:14  Ray Cassick wrote: you can't be good in computers unless you are good in math I was also brought up to believe that. Was even not allowed to attend comp. sci. at school because my math wasn't great (OK, just not great). Reality is that 80% of ppl that started with comp. sci. at school ended up dropping it. I'll be sure to drop passed the local McD when I next go home to see how they are doing (not at all bitter) . I have some done a fair amount of math in some projects, but it's not the bulk of the industry I work in at all. Cheers, Simon sig :: "Don't try to be like Jackie. There is only one Jackie.... Study computers instead.", Jackie Chan on career choices. article :: animation mechanics in SVG blog:: brokenkeyboards "Most of us are programmers, but a few use VB", Christian Graus Re: Self taught, all the way Nemanja Trifunovic13-Jul-05 9:04 Nemanja Trifunovic 13-Jul-05 9:04  Ray Cassick wrote: that you can't be good in computers unless you are good in math. Depends. Every programmer must be good at least in some math: Boolean algebra, basics of set theory, etc. Then there may be a need for more depending on specifics of programmer's job. Ie, in the beginning of my career I used numerical analysis, later computational geometry, and these days some statistics and probability (admitedly, not much ) Math is a tool, like everything else, and having another tool in your pocket can never hurt. My programming blahblahblah blog. If you ever find anything useful here, please let me know to remove it. Re: Self taught, all the way Tom Clement13-Jul-05 14:33 Tom Clement 13-Jul-05 14:33  I learned how to program in a single university extension course. Before that, I was a litigation attorney. All that schooling and almost none of it had any relevance to my current life. Tom Clement Serena Software, Inc. www.serena.com articles[^] Re: Self taught, all the way Antti Keskinen13-Jul-05 19:44 Antti Keskinen 13-Jul-05 19:44  Went through high school and professional high, and now doing my B.Sc in Software Engineering.. So far, I've pretty much self-taught myself everything I've ever needed. The teachers and the classes aren't worth much, since due to time constraints, they can't teach anything specific or in-detail, thus I have to learn it all myself.. -Antti Keskinen ---------------------------------------------- "If we wrote a report stating we saw a jet fighter with a howitzer, who's going to believe us ?" -- R.A.F. pilot quote on seeing a Me 262 armed with a 50mm Mauser cannon. Re: Self taught, all the way Michael A. Barnhart14-Jul-05 9:43 Michael A. Barnhart 14-Jul-05 9:43  Christian Graus wrote: Self taught, all the way I dropped out of high school I assume after you learned how to read. And yes I could read before High School also. I do not mind getting old. It beats all the other options that I can think of. Re: Self taught, all the way Gammill15-Jul-05 20:00 Gammill 15-Jul-05 20:00  I had 5 "careers" prior to discovering computers. Then numerous years in the field prior to discovering "programming". All self taught, on the job, when I was past 30. No home computers for me when I was growing up But in code I found a home. Still, I often wondered if my friends that had their computer science degrees had more "depth". The best programmers I have met were engineers turned programmer. And the best sys admin was a Astro Physicist. I have a question to suggest to the poll: how many editors have you used? How many languages have your learned (I include shell scripting)? Has anyone here ever uses a character editior on a Silent 700? Or even know what a character editor is? (War stories ) WedgeSoft highschool? what computers were around when you were in HS? Almighty Bob12-Jul-05 7:22 Almighty Bob 12-Jul-05 7:22  c64 here. not too relevant to todays technology. although it did endear a love for the "goto" statement. I remember the punch card / tape systems my father developed on, that filled an entire room. /bb|[^b]{2}/ Re: highschool? what computers were around when you were in HS? Yuval Naveh12-Jul-05 7:59 Yuval Naveh 12-Jul-05 7:59  C64..XT... "The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination." - Albert Einstein Re: highschool? what computers were around when you were in HS? Navin12-Jul-05 9:07 Navin 12-Jul-05 9:07  If you had a 386, you were "the bomb". Most of our computers in high school were 286's or 8088's that had dual floppy drives and no hard disk. Fortunatley, Turbo Pascal fit on one floppy, which left you a second to store your programs. The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance. Re: highschool? what computers were around when you were in HS? Chris Maunder12-Jul-05 15:56 Chris Maunder 12-Jul-05 15:56  And the Turbo Technojocks Toolkit fit on another. Memory lane... cheers, Chris Maunder Re: highschool? what computers were around when you were in HS? ed welch12-Jul-05 14:19 ed welch 12-Jul-05 14:19  Technology is not the only part of your job, even if you're a programmer. English and Maths also very important. I also did more advanced maths in university, but never needed it for my job - just the simple stuff from secondry school was enough. Re: highschool? what computers were around when you were in HS? Chris Maunder12-Jul-05 15:55 Chris Maunder 12-Jul-05 15:55  BBCs! Ah - they were the days (Am I dating myself here? ) cheers, Chris Maunder Re: highschool? what computers were around when you were in HS? nutsnbolts12-Jul-05 17:03 nutsnbolts 12-Jul-05 17:03  The programming class I had in high school was in cobal, using punched cards. We had to send the stack to the community college to see if it would compile/run. Jim Re: highschool? what computers were around when you were in HS? Jason De Arte12-Jul-05 17:48 Jason De Arte 12-Jul-05 17:48  We had an 'old school' server room and green TTY terminals EVERYWHERE There were even 2 braille paper terminals that were combination printers(indenters?) and keyboards. I used to stare in awe at those giant drive platers in the clear plastic canister. It was as close as I would ever get to the W.O.P.E.R. from WarGames[^] without all the blinking lights. The year after I graduated High School they "upgraded" to 286's. All the sexyness was gone [ Jason De Arte | Toy Maker | 1001010.com ]

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00     Last Update: 6-Jun-24 13:54 Refresh 123 Next ᐅ

General    News    Suggestion    Question    Bug    Answer    Joke    Praise    Rant    Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.