|
|
or you could get the one mysql provides for absolutely free (which doesnt use any of .NET's standard clients, but does its standard ado.net implementation 100% as mysql intends). I can give anyone my paypal address if they're into throwing away money :P
/bb|[^b]{2}/
|
|
|
|
|
you might have a look at VistaDB!
|
|
|
|
|
i've been working for two companies in the last tow years and all is SQL server 2000 , can't wait for SQL server 2005
|
|
|
|
|
I am also waiting for it, but even if it comes up I will have to wait until at least nine months before I can start using it because it's unlikely that our clients will support it.
Regards,
Alexandru Savescu
|
|
|
|
|
I use SQL server 2000 in most of my projects. Sometimes if the customer asks for it, I can put in MsAccess (in rare ocasions) or MySQL. But those two aren't as good and complete as SQL server 2000.
Where access lacks power when used over a network with multiple users. MySQL lacks relational things like foreign keys (not anymore after 4.0).
I can't wait for SQL server 2005, it's promising and I think my customers are going to love it 
I'll bear with you two!
WM.
What about weapons of mass-construction?
|
|
|
|
|
I also believe that SQL Server 2000 is the best among the list. Also Waiting for 2005 version.
Lav Pathak
Application Developer
Auxiliary Enterprises
Kalamazoo, MI
|
|
|
|
|
AbdKel wrote:
can't wait for SQL server 2005
because SQL Server 2000 is so good, or SQL Server 2000 is so bad?
Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering.
aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie"
boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
