|
OriginalGriff wrote: without your real world identity
The deuce you say.
|
|
|
|
|
Today we can talk to them senses to not to use or use with caution social media. With ban - especially one that cannot be forced - it will be gone. A final win to the filthy side of social media...
"It never ceases to amaze me that a spacecraft launched in 1977 can be fixed remotely from Earth." ― Brian Cox
|
|
|
|
|
If I were the king, I would just ban children. Very few social redeeming values. 
>64
It’s weird being the same age as old people. Live every day like it is your last; one day, it will be.
|
|
|
|
|
Too bad you already gave up all of your guns...
that said, pull the router, don't give kids smart phones, parents be responsible, etc. It's not complex, it just requires conviction, courage and the ability to laugh at your kids while they melt down. Vodka helps.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: make it impossible to use the internet without your real world identity being attached to everything you post
The sociopaths bullies would not be affected, because they don't bother hiding their identity now. They enjoy the attention they receive from terrorizing those they believe are weak. Instead, those kids who are seeking help anonymously would be forced to reveal their identity in the process.
As one who was frequently bullied and spent a fair amount of my adolescence depressed and suicidal, I find this a concern.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
There would be mass confusion.
|
|
|
|
|
Only for the densest people
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure if this is a joke or not, if it is... forgive me as I didn't get it.
But, if it's not... can we not do better than this? Like what kinda person does nothing but insult, thinking their way is always superior?
Note, I've seen this argument 1,000 times online by those who know nothing of the imperial system or its history. And, I'm not even suggesting it be maintained, but the smugness exuding over a measurement system is insane and clearly over compensating for something.
Edit: And yes, I realize that there's 2.2 pounds per kg, so maybe that's the joke. And maybe it's a touchy subject for me and I'm being whiny. I just don't see anything new here in the past 20 years with most dialog.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
I'm guessing it's a joke, density = mass / volume, kind of thing. But it is in fact a weighty issue. 
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, maybe I should've just said it wasn't a funny joke. I'll shut up now.
Mabye
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
It was a botched joke on density. I debated if explaining it or not, I probably chose the wrong option.
Changing units of measure is tough for anyone. I'm approaching aviation where everything is in knots and miles and feet and holy cow.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
I'm just gonna shut up man. I'm old and grumpy. La la la.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
I bet you’re fun at parties; and not too bright either. Of course it was a joke 🤦♂️
|
|
|
|
|
It takes a genius to recognize a genius; clearly you don't. 
Also, I bet you're ugly. Ha ha ha ha. Joking. But, I'll repeat that for 20 years. Ha ha ha. You must laugh now or else you have the problem and are boring at parties.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Also, since you can't read... it was a lousy joke that's been repeated 1,000s of times. And mix that with countless chats about how people feel superior (not joking) about using it on CP for the past 20 YEARS... I don't expect you to understand when you're part of the problem.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Oops, think I must have touched a nerve. Calm down dear.
|
|
|
|
|
Or maybe you're just a narcissist who can't read, little man. Go crawl back into your anonymous little scaredy-cat hole.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reminds me of this question of yesteryears:
Which is heavier -
One kilogram of iron OR one kilogram of cotton?
(Or, in imperial units, one pound of iron OR one pound of cotton)
This is from a book called "Physics for Entertainment" by Perelman, written more than 100 years ago, Russia.
|
|
|
|
|
The proper answer to the question is "Try dropping each on your big toe to find out!"
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
|
|
|
|
|
Imagine if some of the states switched from driving on the right side of the road to driving on the left side, overnight.
There would be mass collision.
|
|
|
|
|
Why did all the left-side-of-the-road countries to choose that side anyway?
There are no solutions, only trade-offs. - Thomas Sowell
A day can really slip by when you're deliberately avoiding what you're supposed to do.
- Calvin (Bill Watterson, Calvin & Hobbes)
|
|
|
|
|
The explanation that I heard once had to do with the side of the horse people mounted from. Of course, this doesn't explain why most British Commonwealth members (and the US) drive on the right. I would have thought they would have inherited the British way of doing things...
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I found this explanation: Quote: At a time when the main danger on the roads was mugging, careful travellers would pass on-coming strangers on the left with their sword arm towards the passer-by.
. It might just be an invented theory.
Anyway I'm not sure the bit about French is correct: Quote: Later, class distinction in France meant that aristocrats drove their carriages on the left side of the road forcing everybody else over to the centre or to the right-hand side. Keeping left had really only ever applied to riding or driving. With the onset of the French Revolution in 1789 and the subsequent declaration of the rights of man in 1791 many aristocrats decided to keep to the ‘poor side’ of the road so as not to draw attention to themselves.
I think, them being French, just wanted to piss everyone off: "Vive la differance!"
Mircea
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: I would have thought they would have inherited the British way of doing things
We didn't fight for our independence just to copy the old country's ways.
There are no solutions, only trade-offs. - Thomas Sowell
A day can really slip by when you're deliberately avoiding what you're supposed to do.
- Calvin (Bill Watterson, Calvin & Hobbes)
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
