|
So as not to influence the doctor. The doctor will have his/her way of thinking, diagnosing. Which I feel should not be interfered with.
|
|
|
|
|
So you wouldn't interfere with a possibly wrong diagnosis?
"In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?"
-- Rigoletto
|
|
|
|
|
I would wait for the doctor to make their diagnosis, then (possibly) ask if he/she had considered the computer's diagnosis.
If you don't trust the doctor to do their best, why do you bother going to them?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: I would wait for the doctor to make their diagnosis, then (possibly) ask if he/she had considered the computer's diagnosis.
This is a good approach, in my opinion.
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: If you don't trust the doctor to do their best, why do you bother going to them?
Most people here have practically no choice, even if their doctor is mediocre, they stick with him/her.
I do trust my doctor (I am lucky, he is above the average). However, his best could be not the absolute best.
"In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?"
-- Rigoletto
|
|
|
|
|
The analogy is a court of law. Have heard that a lawyer asking a leading question is generally frowned upon.
Similarly, if I as a patient, based on my search engine results, ask the doctor "Is ... condition possible, doctor", then it's like a leading question, and may make that doctor think only along those lines; we would like the doctor to have a "360-degree" approach - meaning "What all is possible, and how can I rule out something?". Asking a leading question would possibly narrow down the doctor's choices towards an incorrect direction. This is what i meant.
|
|
|
|
|
And then you find out your doctor is consulting the same AI.
|
|
|
|
|
100% agree, buddy.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
This is why I only go to places like WebMD and Mayo Clinic when I'm looking for medical advice. At least I know these two sites are backed and maintained by top notch medical systems.
|
|
|
|
|
Pseudo intellectualism sounds a bit pseudo-intellectual...
|
|
|
|
|
Ha ha ha. It was a cool phrase man. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. 
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
At some point, there must be a tipping point where pseudo stops being pseudo and becomes real. I suspect that there's no hard delineation there, but it's interesting to think that there's a grey area where one slips over into the other.
|
|
|
|
|
Long time no see, buddy. And totally agree. But, two things to consider...
1) Experience is the real teacher in life. You cannot really learn something until you go through it. Let me give an analogy. You can read about heart break in books or watch YouTube for a year. You may think you're an expert. Nothing will prepare you for the real thing. Experience.
This doesn't mean don't read, but even Einstein agreed there is another tipping point where books can do just as much harm as reading nothing at all, when they become a crutch. At some point, you need to apply that knowledge to really learn.
2) There's no guarantee the master carpenter isn't also studied and experienced. Maybe they haven't kept up and you do surpass them. I've met a lot of ignorant doctors for instance. But without that experience there are things you really don't know and never will... maybe like why things are the way they are. And it's folly to assume before you even talk to them that your YouTube videos makes you better. As in, a real intellectual will ascertain first.
Now, you can learn from other people's experience, but you also have to actually talk to them rather than insult them before speaking to them because you watched a video. Which never happens online. It's just an ego trip by most from what I've seen.
Jeremy Falcon
modified 9-Sep-24 10:58am.
|
|
|
|
|
sexual intellectual!
>64
It’s weird being the same age as old people. Live every day like it is your last; one day, it will be.
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: I watched one YouTube video. Kneel before me my knowledge.
Until you meet the guy who watched, two, count them, two YouTube videos on the topic..
|
|
|
|
|
Ha ha ha ha. Kneel before Zod! Am I right?
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I've found that, generally, I have to watch at least three YouTube videos to become a true expert.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey all, long time passive viewer of all things CP, but especially the Daily Insider. Over the last ~10 days I haven't had one Daily Insider come through, which means ... withdrawal symptoms  . Looks like I'm still subscribed, and not going to Spam, so I was just wondering if anyone else is having this issue?
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
|
It has been reported there for at least a week. It looks like Kent is out of commission for some reason. Not sure what.
To err is human to really elephant it up you need a computer
modified 9-Sep-24 14:03pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the heads-up, I had no idea 
Clearly I'm not the only one struggling with this
|
|
|
|
|
Same here! I'm also going through withdrawal. I verified it's not come in for me since August 29th. What's up?
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Lee 2021 wrote: Looks like I'm still subscribed
Have you paid your daily subscription?
|
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
