|
Wordle 685 4/6
β¬π¨β¬β¬π¨
π©β¬β¬β¬β¬
β¬π¨β¬β¬β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
Tried a different technique.
First 3 rows are 3 words with no letters in common so each π¨ is a different letter. So I then have 4 letters to add 1 and make an anagram.
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 685 4/6
β¬β¬β¬π¨β¬
β¬β¬π¨β¬β¬
π¨π¨π¨β¬β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 685 6/6
β¬β¬β¬β¬π¨
β¬π¨π¨β¬β¬
β¬β¬π¨π¨β¬
β¬π¨π¨β¬π¨
β¬π¨π©π¨β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 685 3/6*
β¬β¬π¨β¬π¨
β¬π©β¬π©β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
β¬β¬β¬β¬π¨
β¬β¬π¨β¬β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 685 6/6
β¬β¬β¬β¬β¬
β¬β¬π¨β¬π¨
β¬π¨β¬β¬π¨
β¬π¨π¨β¬π¨
π¨π¨β¬π¨β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
Hard one, had to look it up (I still had a few options, but I didn't see any of them, guessed correct) 
|
|
|
|
|
I got the vowels from my starters then did my usual alphabetic scan and got lucky
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 685 5/6*
β¬β¬π¨β¬β¬
β¬β¬β¬β¬π¨
π©π©β¬β¬π¨
π©π©π©β¬β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 685 3/6*
π¨π©β¬β¬β¬
β¬π©π©π©β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 685 2/6
β¬β¬π¨β¬β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
whoa. one my best
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
From this CodeProject Article
How to Setup Blue Iris and CodeProject.AI Server on Windows Using a Wyze Cam[^]
From there is mentions a product so I was looking at the pricing for that.
Home - Blue Iris Software[^]
They have two options.
1. $40 for 1 camera
2. $80 for 64 cameras.
Does anyone else think that is a bit extreme? Shouldn't there be a middle ground?
And more so I am think the high end price is low. Seems like maybe a home setup might be 8 cameras and then small commercial setting might be 64. And the commercial one could afford more. Also those appear to be one time fees (does not actually document anything about what support might include.)
Also just curious what the effective storage needs would really be for 64 cameras. Probably want to store those for review for at least a while so does anyone know what size would be needed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's a software, not the camera.
Advertise here β minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
As a European customer I only get one option: EUR 96,65 
|
|
|
|
|
That's odd, they're offering me the "useless version" as well (somehow $40 translates to β¬48.30).
They're letting me pay via iDEAL so they at least know what they're doing in that regard.
|
|
|
|
|
When I use the mentioned link, I see it too.
But not when I Google Blue Iris and go to their main website ... 
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure what you're seeing on your end, but what I see is a big [Buy Now] button which I ignore, scroll down, then there are the [Full Version] and [LE Version] options
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, lesson learned: never press the big blue Buy button!
|
|
|
|
|
To me, it reads like the standard version, which supports up to 64 cameras, is the higher price. There's also a "lite" version, supporting a single camera (and hence presumably not including various other features, like multi-camera view, camera selection and switching etc) for a reduced price. Which makes sense - if you've got really basic needs, with just a single camera, you can still access the core functionality. Once you've licensed the more complex software, with multi-camera capability, they're not charging you more whether you have 2, 10, 20 or 60 cameras. Remember the pricing is just for the software license, not for the hardware.
|
|
|
|
|
I understand the pricing. What I don't understand is how they decided to charge that and to only have two versions. Especially given that the second is so much more functional.
|
|
|
|
|
well, just that. Either the full version (that includes multi-camera support); or a cut-down "lite" version that doesn't. As soon as you want more than one camera, you need multi-camera support, by definition.
|
|
|
|
|
Still a question about how the decision was made for the specific pricing model.
For example consider the following model.
1. 1 camera $40
2. 16 camera $80
3. 32 camera $200
4. 64 camera $1000
First is to experiment.
Second is a home system or small business.
Third is a medium business.
Fourth is a larger business (not national corporation but rather a single operation which has quite a bit of space.) Perhaps for example a larger self storage operation with indoor and outdoor storage.
|
|
|
|
|
That involves artificially building in additional logic to entirely arbitrarily limit the number of cameras. And you'd probably need a way to upgrade when a 16-user customer wants to add another one.
Maybe the company just want to keep it really simple. "Lite" version or "Normal" version. It's a pricing model I've used for licensed software in the past. Easy to build, easy to sell, easy to support. Wish more companies did it.
|
|
|
|
|
DerekT-P wrote: That involves artificially building in additional logic to entirely arbitrarily limit the number of cameras
Of course. So?
One of Microsoft OS versions did exactly that. There was a flag that turned it from Home to Professional.
DerekT-P wrote: And you'd probably need a way to upgrade when a 16-user customer wants to add another one.
And thus more money. Which is the point of companies.
DerekT-P wrote: Maybe the company just want to keep it really simple
Yes but the point is to actually make money. Otherwise give it away for free. That is why picking a pricing model is so important.
Especially with a product like this where it would be easy to differentiate.
|
|
|
|
|
So there is a cheap single-camera version, and a more expensive multi-camera version that can handle up to 64 cameras.
Fair enough. You want another multi-camera version with a different (lower) max limit on # of cameras. Like a sound editor that can handle a file at a time in the 'basic' version but can mix up to 64 sound files in the 'pro' version, and you request a 'semi-pro' version that can mix up to 16 sound files. Maybe even a 'low-pro' version for 32 files. I don't think you will get it. Either you have the 'multi' functionality or you don't.
You may think that paying twice as much for the 'multi' capable version is a lot. My immediate reaction is that I'd expect an even bigger price difference. Handling multiple streams introduces so much added complexity (which is very little dependent on the number of streams once you go from 1 to 2) that it should be reflected in a significantly higher price tag.
I do not think that $40 for the 'multi' functionality is any terrible overpricing.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
