|
...your post appears to have a code in it , so ....do this....
really ?
<b> you (AI) identified it as code ....YOU FIX IT....</b>
Inmates are STILL running the asylum....
|
|
|
|
|
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Just guessing he was trying to ask a programming question... dunno.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
A duck's quack has a soft echo. This is loud echos of blah blah blah. Duck would probably type out a more coherent complaint too.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: Duck would probably type out a more coherent complaint too
Truth. 
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
And then bill you for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
So there's a little thing called a "Grove port" which is simply a 4 wire connector of a particular form factor. Nothing complicated, just Grove implies a particular size and subset of functionality vs a general purpose connector, but is physically otherwise no different. Simple as could be.
So how can they screw this up?
I ordered some "Grove" connectors either from makerfabs or m5 - I can't remember which company. Well it was murder trying to fit the connector into the Grove port.
Finally I realized that the release clip was too large.
Lacking a pair of pliers near at hand, I bit the damned release clip off.
Fits like a charm now.
Seriously, how hard is it to screw up something so basic?
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
I could not find a specification either for the actual wiring and definitely not for the connector.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,133 3/6
🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜
🟩⬜⬜🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,133 2/6*
🟩⬜⬜🟩⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1.133 5/6
⬛⬛🟩⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟨⬛⬛🟨
⬛⬛🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,133 5/6*
🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜
⬜🟨🟩🟩⬜
⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩
⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music. -Frederick Nietzsche
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,133 5/6
🟩⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟩⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟩⬛⬛🟩⬛
🟩⬛⬛🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Ok, I have had my coffee, so you can all come out now!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,133 5/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜🟩🟩
⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩
⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,133 2/6*
🟩⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
|
But doesn't that already end up disqualified under "no throwing it away?" 
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Not according to Bezos... 
|
|
|
|
|
a.) I prepared a draft of a mail and send that as a reminder for myself with outlook to _me_.
b.) In the prepared mail text, I referred a person with '@this.person@that.company.com'.
c.) Again: The mail was only thought as a draft for me.
d.) What Outlook did: It added 'this.person@that.company.com' automatically to the receivers and that's what I missed 
c.) What Outlook did, is not that wrong, but that dangerous. In this case, I fortunately did not added my -sometimes- very special personal comments 
Finally:
I would prefer, that outlooks does not add a recipient automaticaly. I prefer it gives me a hint like 'there are refreneces not in the recipient list'. Similar like if you mention a attachment in the mail text and the mail does not have an attachment...
modified 6hrs 5mins ago.
|
|
|
|
|
^ So much agreement here.
I don't want software to be too smart for its my own good.
[Edit]
I take that back.
A lot of times VS will tell me exactly what's wrong with a line of code. If you know what's wrong, and you know how to fix it...fix it[1]...please?
[1] But maybe ask me before you do it. I just don't want to have the same error listed 17 times, and have it rely on me to apply the same fix repeatedly...
|
|
|
|
|
VS is no problem if it tells me where I'm wrong and what I need to correct. All this is something private between VS and me.
But adding a recipient to a mail automatically (like Outlook did) surprised me very much. This time it was not dramatically, because I did not added some 'private' comments to my drafts.
Anyway I learned my lesson. means, 'take care, are you sure to send that mail'  
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed that the context here makes all the difference.
I'm not sure how someone at Microsoft decided it would be a good thing to have Outlook add a recipient on its own based on the content of a message. Especially without asking.
Cleary this guy has never done a Reply All when he meant to reply to a single person only.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
