|
Maybe has has performed - ahem - "other services" for Chris??? Are you sure you want to know?
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous ----- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944 ----- I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy. Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
Looking at his reputation graph, many of his articles have been 'recognized' in 2013.
Just a hypothesis.
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
I *think* the MVPs are awarded purely on the basis of Rep gained in a given year, though on this basis it seems to be skewed in favour of authoring articles over answering questions. It just strikes me as counter-productive that CP is awarding inactive members when we've people who are very active (BillWoodruff has been highlighted, I'm sure therre are others) who aren't included. I expect it is be an easy process to remove people who haven't posted in the qualifying year (or some other criteria).
|
|
|
|
|
|
So it's bribe than?
I also got some seeds but didn't know where to send, so I gave it to my birds...
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think he was very active until the latter part of 2013.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
"Most Valuable Professional"
"Most Valuable" implies there should only be one, and "professional" implies someone who does it for a living.
Surely something akin to "hypernerd" would be more appropriate.
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
For sheer levels of pedantry/correctness, have a +5.
|
|
|
|
|
Please don't smirch the reputation of those guys, you know they are the best of us, they....
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Philpott wrote: "Most Valuable" implies there should only be one Most big numbers can be found above zero.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Congratulations
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Amazing there are a few on the MVP list who haven't posted or created years.
|
|
|
|
|
I've raised this in Bugs & Suggestions. Chris has already replied, but I think I wasn't very clear, so I've tried to clarify.
|
|
|
|
|
MVP selection process on CP is unfair to me, perhaps they like some guys who has some good articles and hence they select them as mvp all time, not judging other good guy's effort on Q&A.
Shuvro
|
|
|
|
|
ridoy wrote: not judging other good guy's effort on Q&A.
That's not true. As Chris said in this message[^], they choose the top 20 article authors and the top 20 Authorities (in Quick Answers and the forums).
|
|
|
|
|
Hi ProgramFox,
I would hope that articles would be "weighted" much more than QA actvity in selecting CP's MVP's, because anyone can quickly gain an inflated QA rep count, or bloat their existing one, with non-solutions posted as solutions.
Congratulations on your excellent reputation, and your three articles !
“There are obvious things, and there are many obvious things no one tried, because no one needed to try them.” Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov, January 1, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: I would hope that articles would be "weighted" much more than QA actvity in selecting CP's MVP's, because anyone can quickly gain an inflated QA rep count, or bloat their existing one, with non-solutions posted as solutions.
I agree that articles should be weighted more, because they get more views and votes than answers. However, if Chris says that he takes the top 20 authors and the top 20 answerers, then I don't know about the article weight for the articles of the top answerers.
BillWoodruff wrote: Congratulations on your excellent reputation, and your three articles !
Thank you very much!
|
|
|
|
|
Whoops, I apologize, I meant to put that comment in response to Ridoy's post !
sorry, Bill
“There are obvious things, and there are many obvious things no one tried, because no one needed to try them.” Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov, January 1, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sorry, but you're plain wrong. I was awarded MVP for several years. Last year, I have not been as active and I was not awarded MVP as a result. This seems to be fair to me. I knew that my inactivity would mean that I would be ineligible for the award.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe there are some people that should have eternal MVP status: like you, and OriginalGriff ... and several others
yours, Bill
“There are obvious things, and there are many obvious things no one tried, because no one needed to try them.” Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov, January 1, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the thought Bill, but I really didn't do enough to justify MVP status.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: I really didn't do enough to justify MVP status
And Josh Smith & Andrew Kirillov did?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not in a position to judge their contributions. I can judge mine though.
|
|
|
|
|
It returneth!
"Can't salary include soft canvas?"(11)
Best of luck.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Starting to feel I was incompetent at cryptic clues but happy now.
|
|
|
|