|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: So what happens when the machine used to read the cards 'thinks' it is in an other country and try to sell you tickets to Haiti? I don't file a formal complaint.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone fathom why, when you're reading a Word document that hasn't been opened for editing, you're not allowed to select and copy text until you enable editing?
How does "selecting text" equate to "I want to edit"? In fact I specifically do not want to edit - I want to select text from a safe, non-editable copy.
ARGH.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Because copy/paste are in the same path of the code, and paste requires edit.
|
|
|
|
|
Since it has been reported that Bill Gates is once again taking an active hand in Microsoft Office products, perhaps if he attempts the same, it will be addressed forthwith.
|
|
|
|
|
Strange - selecting and copying text works for me in "protected view".
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
It's called the Gates effect; the way things should be done is inversely proportional to common sense!
|
|
|
|
|
I've noticed that in a few mobile apps. Maybe it's a permission-clawing thing.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
For the same reason a SERP exists?
(Because it's there ... oh, wait a minute, no it's not ...)
|
|
|
|
|
I came across that exact issue at exactly 16:45 yesterday afternoon.
I know that's what time it was, because that was the proverbial straw - so I took an early mark!
I think you also can't print!
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
I have the problem where if I want to search the document, I cannot click Ctrl+F until I actually click inside the document. This only happens in non-edit mode for me. Microsoft needs to focus on being user-friendly.
|
|
|
|
|
I can code all day long (literally) on black background without getting blurry vision. If I staring at something with white background for 10 minutes, my vision start getting blurry and it gets worst the longer I stare at it. Worst on smaller screen.
Any one experienced similar? Or vise versus?
|
|
|
|
|
Screen is too bright, eye fatigue?
Does this happen on paper (in normal lighting), or just computer screens?
|
|
|
|
|
Pualee wrote: Screen is too bright, eye fatigue?
Agreed. I had to replace a dead monitor a week ago, and was reminded how they typically ship with a brightness setting that's just way too high, and most people don't adjust it. It's like staring at the sun.
I have all my monitors set with the brightness all the way down to 0 (well, ok, 5 for one of my oldest ones), and contrast at maybe 75% (this varies between displays).
|
|
|
|
|
Yup, on paper too. Anything with bright background.
|
|
|
|
|
Leng Vang wrote: Any one experienced similar
Nope. I like a white background - I find the dark background... odd.
|
|
|
|
|
RACIST!!!
(Well, if you'd said it the other way round, you'd have been called on it)
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Now if you put it that way I will have to go gorge my eye out, since other parts of my body doing just fine. The eyes clearly the sinner!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Probably too much porn ....
|
|
|
|
|
For all we know, porn are usually have darker view or more pleasantly color tones. And for the record, I have clear vision for porn
|
|
|
|
|
|
How much rhythm does it take to knock "Shave and a haircut"?
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous ----- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944 ----- I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy. Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
OK - this is not a coding question but it does include some code.
Brace yourselves (pun intended) :-
/// <summary>
/// How dependencies are resolved
/// </summary>
[Flags]
public enum DependencyOrdinality
{
/// <summary>
/// This task can start even if its dependency has not yet started
/// </summary>
Optional = 0x0,
/// <summary>
/// This task can run if the dependency is running
/// </summary>
ConcurrentRun = 0x1,
/// <summary>
/// This task can run if the dependency has completed successfully
/// </summary>
PostSuccess = 0x2,
/// <summary>
/// This task can run if the dependency has completed in a failed state
/// </summary>
PostFail = 0x4
}
OK - so the word "Ordinality" is wrong. What should I call this?
|
|
|
|
|
I would use a descriptor that makes sense to you/other developers.
enumerator == ordinal, hence I would use a descriptor.
"Religion is the most malevolent of all mind viruses." - Arthur C. Clarke
|
|
|
|
|