|
PompeyThree wrote: bastards
Well, if that was the answer, then I wasn't even close!
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
I see, but since then you didn't post another right?
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I'm not going to waste 30 seconds of my time creating one just for people not to bother answering.
|
|
|
|
|
ROCKET
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
0B 0W
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
HobbyProggy wrote: 0B 0W
That good, huh? Oh well, 6 letters down, 20 to go!
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
stylus
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
0B 1W
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
0B 1W
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
XKPEAZ
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
0B 1W
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
You are up tomorrow
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I'm late...
Free trade for sunny side (5)
|
|
|
|
|
swaps? (it's totally a guess)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FRIED? (another total guess!)
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have a system that takes messages from a JMS queue, and then processes them on the back end of a Unix server. Recently it has started taking some (a very small number of the total) messages, but not processing them. No errors, no logging, some messages merely disappear.
We've checked everything from our side, it is undoubtedly taking the messages from the queue, but somehow those messages are lost at some point.
So we've asked the vendor to investigate.
They refuse to do so without a screenshot of the problem occuring.
I've just replied letting them know I'll rustle up a screenshot of something not happening in a process on the backend of a server for them.
Just as soon as I've finished bottling unicorn farts.
Six and a half days to go.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
73
"You'd have to be a floating database guru clad in a white toga and ghandi level of sereneness to fix this goddamn clusterfuck.", BruceN[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Wrong... it is 42
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Not anymore. 73 is a better number. If you don't trust me, ask Sheldon[^].
"You'd have to be a floating database guru clad in a white toga and ghandi level of sereneness to fix this goddamn clusterfuck.", BruceN[ ^]
|
|
|
|