|
It's probably less that AI will take over development in the near-ish future, but more that it could iterate much more quickly and for longer periods where the advantage for machines lies.
They'll make a lot of the same sort of stupid blunders we all make, but will be able to try a different approach much more quickly than we can type, and won't have to take time away for that pesky eating and sleeping.
Is Skynet online yet?
|
|
|
|
|
We can always learn how to write requirements.
The machines need some kind of input. Even in the Matrix, it was "yes, we accept this reality." And when they decide to go off and explore the universe, they'll have no reason to concern themselves with this little ball of mud any longer - particularly as it's coated with light silicates. They might leave the depleted carcass to us.
|
|
|
|
|
AI is a pipe-dream - nothing more. A computer is a mechanism, and so is a computer program: it's a software mechanism. So is an internal combustion engine.
Functional, strong AI in a computer system is as likely as your car's internal combustion engine, together (presumably) with its engine management system, evolving into Optimus Prime. Isn't going to happen.
I think what does happen all the time is that people have no idea how a computer works, and so they choose to believe that it's somehow an intelligent, thinking system -- which is the same as believing that your car knows where to go when you start it up.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll start worrying about that around the time natural language recognition is a fully solved problem. Should be any day now, given that we've been "5 years away" since like 1960.
|
|
|
|
|
I would certainly dismiss you immediately for poor grammar and poor thinking.
|
|
|
|
|
why? You always you can to continue programming.For example IA programming or for the improvement and maintenance of IA. But if you're a bad programmer will always could get other jobs to do, to be able to survive. That term "the machines remove our work" is only for failed people that the best thing to do is receive orders, they have no initiative and motivation for start up thing, want everything done.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 11375116 wrote: think computers can write programs in the future.
Nope.
Member 11375116 wrote: artificial intelligence will be better than a lot of programmers
Nope.
|
|
|
|
|
Internet Explorer has been terminated with extreme prejudice on my work machine. I am now basking in the fluorescent transcendence that is Chrome.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Is that the Gary Wheeler of 2010?
I'm actually back to firefox. Too often Chrome failed to show a page correctly for me.
|
|
|
|
|
FF is still a greedy pig - it does like to hog it's memory rather too much for me. I'm back to Chrome again.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
? I found Chrome way more greedy than FF, plus the mangled layouts of many pages.
Geek code v 3.12 {
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
}
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
|
|
|
|
|
I don't get that problem - it's probably a reflection of the different way we use our browsers.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
yeah - porn is so much easier to render ...
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
Main problem I experience is still being single-process, one plugin can bring down the entire session.
Memory wise, my perception is that chrome got worse and ff got better, to the point where I don't care about the difference.
Plus, I moved from google to duckduckgo as main search engine and I thought that would be a little pointless if I continued to use chrome.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. I've used Firefox here at work and at home on occasion, and just prefer Chrome.
Our corporate IT Gestapo insists that the corporate intranet sites only work properly with IE. I did a quick test, and the intranet sites I use (bug tracking and HR) all work just fine with Chrome. The thing that finally triggered IE's demise was the most recent group policy push, which triggers security message boxes from IE for almost every navigation. In some cases I was getting message boxes for just scrolling the damned page.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Did they investigate to see if the security alerts are actually an issue?
|
|
|
|
|
Professional rough loses point, bronze component close by a positive hydrogen nucleus leads to deferral. (15)
Sorry for being so late with this. Suddenly, and when I least expected it, work started interfering with my usual CP activities. I hope this will stay an exception to the rule.
Cheers and have fun!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
modified 22-Jul-15 7:32am.
|
|
|
|
|
Something says that I will have to answer this later.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Something says that I will have to answer this later.
I first thought of replying later, but then again I've already had enough of this for today.
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, I wonder if I should just declare you the winner and be done with it, but then again I'd rather wait a bit longer.
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
modified 22-Jul-15 7:45am.
|
|
|
|
|
I was going to reply earlier, but decided to put it off a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought I might answer it tomorrow - if I can be bothered.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Why do it tomorrow? I'm sure it can wait until the day after.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't want to commit myself that far ahead...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Are you going to post the solution?
Cheers!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|