|
As usual these things tend to catch you at the end when you outsource incompetency...
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
It seems that a big oversight (?) in Windows Explorer is that a lot of folder properties are not available as fields. I'd like to be able to have such properties be able to be displayed (in the Details View mode). It seems that the apps out there like FreeCommander offer the same properties (big help!). Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commander. The one and unique. All derived PutANameHereCommander are only mere clones.
|
|
|
|
|
right-click on the column header display in the details view in Windows Explorer and choose the fields you want to display.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
File Count and Total Size. Coolness! +5
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
File Count and Total Size don't work for me. Total Size displays the total drive space used and File Count is just empty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Never ceases to amaze me how many people seem never to explore right click, or even the application menus.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't want to have to right-click on every folder and write down the value in a spreadsheet. I'd like for the window to just show it.
|
|
|
|
|
swampwiz wrote: I don't want to have to right-click on every folder and write down the value in a spreadsheet. Then you need to explore the column properties as someone suggest above, or write your own Explorer extension or stand alone application.
|
|
|
|
|
This is why I have asked if anyone knew a good freeware app to do this. Of course, I could roll my own in WinForms, but what would be the point if an app that does it is COTS?
|
|
|
|
|
Well I was just offering an alternative suggestion. It's up to you which you choose.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
|
|
|
|
|
Andy Lanng wrote: It should be whome, right? No, because "whome" is not a word.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
My education is older that I am
Ok then; whome = whom
I guess I should've guessed that replies to my pedantic message would be pedantic
|
|
|
|
|
Andy Lanng wrote: I guess I should've guessed that replies to my pedantic message would be pedantic Sorry, couldn't resist.
As others have remarked, I think "For those who code" is correct.
If the slogan was written for consumers of code (e.g. end users), then the phrase "For whom the code is written" would be preferred over "For who the code is written".
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Have you really got two 'n's in your name?
|
|
|
|
|
Ravi Bhavnani wrote: No, because "whome" is not a word. Maybe we are just ignorant and it's a word tht we don't know the meaning of. Yet.
Perhaps it's something to eat. Pass me the whomes, please.
I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, whome are you referring to?
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't the W silent? Whomer Simpson?
|
|
|
|
|
It is correct.
Whome is not a word.
Whom is, but is only used in restricted circumstances - either when the he/him rule applies, or when you are doing a Homer Simpson impression to attempt to sneak into a fancy strip club.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You mean 'latter'?
Pedantry rules OK...
|
|
|
|
|
|