|
It looks like Microsoft needs more time to test its Recall security changes. Just in case you don't recall it, they do
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tech giant OpenAI just unveiled a revolutionary feature for its flagship GPT-4o models. This includes the ability to fine-tune them, giving developers the chance to curate customized versions. Now it can hallucinate just for you
|
|
|
|
|
Will they work as a kender [^] insult generator?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
An IDE built on top of a canvas, Haystack takes care of the tedious and confusing parts of coding for you For all your needle hunting needs
|
|
|
|
|
MSTest ships with a set of analyzers that inspect your test code and point out common mistakes and pitfalls. That's who will test the tests
|
|
|
|
|
"Who knows how much farther we'll go on..." -Billy Joel, For the Longest Time
We should test the tester tests too,
what more tests could we do?
Let's just write all of the tests this time.
|
|
|
|
|
Windows 11 (and any older version of Windows) doesn’t allow more than one camera app to access the webcam hardware unless you use a third-party app that creates a virtual camera setup. So you can attend multiple video chats at the same time?
I know I'm an old fuddie, but I fail to see any use case here.
|
|
|
|
|
It means that spyware* can now view your camera when you're on a call.
*Windows
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
We’ve made improvements across our toolchain, Unreal Engine support, Build Insights, CMake debugger, and more. Even more pluses
|
|
|
|
|
Another Visual Studio update almost always comes with a new set bugs. This one is no exception. They have broken Find In Files this time.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, plenty of people out there have been watching the ongoing storm of excitement, overpromising, and disaster with a look of disgust. Welcome to the club
|
|
|
|
|
I'm just waiting for the lawsuits when people realize we never got past ML, it's just the money started drying up so they gave it a snazzy new name.
They're doing it again with AGI.
|
|
|
|
|
Article wrote: and disaster with a look of disgust. Disgust? I would say more like "amusement"
Sadly I forgot to buy more popcorn
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
A Texas judge has put the rule on hold, saying it would ‘cause irreparable harm.’ So get back to not being competitive
Just how does Europe survive without those "oh so helpful and necessary" non-competes? (as I've heard they're not used there)
edit: derp. Removed the 'not' as my brain can't handle too many negatives in a sentence.
edit-edit: Back we go. See above.
modified 21-Aug-24 14:34pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You mean, get back to being non-competitive, because the rule against the agreements has been blocked.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
See? I told you I get confused by too many negatives. Changing it back.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
The ruling is correct. Now if the Dept of Labor had done this the ruling would have gone the other way as this is in their Congressionally mandated function. The problem is that it was the wrong department banning non-compete clauses.
|
|
|
|
|
Understandable. I couldn’t understand why the FTC did it in the first place.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe the ATF has an opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
My brain read noncompetent agreement, it's the government I don't see the difference?
A home without books is a body without soul. Marcus Tullius Cicero
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.4.0 (Many new features) JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: EventAggregator
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Just how does Europe survive without those "oh so helpful and necessary" non-competes?
In Italy we have them. They are regulated but we have them. Main regulation points:
* They must be compensated beyond the normal pay;
* They are null if the compensation is lower than 15% of yearly wage;
* They must be constrained both in duration and geographical area and cannot exceed 5 years anyway;
* The compensation must reflect the heaviness of constraints (the wider / longer, the more they have to be compensated. No 15% for a worldwide ban for 5 years);
* They apply only to direct competitors. If someone moves from automotive firmware to aerospace firmware there is no sanction;
* The sanction to the employee is fixed at 2 times the cumulative amount received during the employment time.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
In security circles, Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures security bulletins can be downright scary. In Linux, however, it's just business as usual. They have more eyes than that
|
|
|
|
|
Given how the headline started, I'm extremely disappointed that it wasn't 42 per week.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: They have more eyes than that The rest do not publish the report, they exploit it
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|