|
Microsoft, to give them their due, have a few "rings" of users:
- Insiders
- Limited-release Home users
- Home users
- Limited-release Pro users
- Pro users
- Enterprise users
CrowdStrike just released their stuff to everyone, without a limited release of any sort. When things went belly up, they had no mitigation plan other than "disable our service". This is not what I expect from purveyors of a critical service.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: This is not what I expect from purveyors of a critical service. Nor what I expect, but let see how severe will be the punishment.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I expect that many large, deep-pocketed organizations will be suing CrowdStrike for damages. This could easily force them into bankruptcy. While the cases are proceeding, it will affect the share price, thereby punishing the shareholders (including the CEO and other officers).It will also make any potential purchasers of the company think twice, so bailing out will become more difficult.
On the consumer level, the best punishment would be organizations migrating to other security providers.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
But the rock still has to be sent back to Earth for extensive testing. "Are physical forces alone at work there, or has evolution begotten something more complex, something not unakin to what we know on Earth as life?"
|
|
|
|
|
Article wrote: But the rock still has to be sent back to Earth for extensive testing. hehehe[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The service is a temporary prototype limited to 10,000 testers for now. Find all the stuff it can imagine
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Find all the stuff it can imagine regurgitate FTFY
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Following licensing changes, 86% of users head for the door. Coincidence? Amazing what happens when you try to squeeze your customers dry
|
|
|
|
|
Where's Captain Obvious when you need him?
Obviously unavailable.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
Article wrote: 86% of users head for the door I am gladly surprised.
Looking at other news and how the world goes today, I would have expected less common sense
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I’m going to tease apart the difference between clean code, as described in Uncle Bob’s book, and clean code, a generic term of praise used in engineering contexts for decades. Sanitized code?
|
|
|
|
|
Clean code is for me only relevant for us, the people.
Doing benchmarks to test performance of "clean" code is not correct, that is efficience not cleanliness
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The achievement is noteworthy because AI systems don't usually fare well with complex math challenges. It did so well because of all the extra toes it added to itself
|
|
|
|
|
Article wrote: AI systems don't usually fare well with complex math challenges. I do not think the maths are the problem, but the description of the exercise.
A good spec is 25% (or more) of the work.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
OpenAI might need another round of funding to remain afloat. Are they using their AI to do their finances?
|
|
|
|
|
Because people read the Shock study above about how well AI is improving everyone's productivity?
Kent, don't you wish you could group these stories better.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
MarkTJohnson wrote: Kent, don't you wish you could group these stories better. I do indeed. Maybe I'll ask Chris for an early present this year.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Are they using their AI to do their finances? We should try to let AI run some companies, it can't be that worse
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Rust’s new LazyCell and LazyLock types delay the initialization of their data until first access. Ranged patterns also get attention in the latest update to the language. I'm part of Rust now?
|
|
|
|
|
Hard work pays off tomorrow.
Laziness pays off today.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
By combining the power of generative AI and large language models (LLMs) with the search results page, Bing’s generative search creates a bespoke and dynamic response to a user’s query. "Bespoke and dynamic response"?!?!?! Can I get "accurate" instead?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Can I get "accurate" instead? No. No you can't.
|
|
|
|
|
On Bing? No.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
I'd go for accurate and fast. For speed - I can read faster than Bing can apparently type. For accuracy - on the day of the New Hampshire primary I was looking for a site that would report on the results as each township reported in. At the time only Dixville Notch had reported (7 votes) and all had gone to Nikki Haley, yet Bing told me Donald Trump had won all the Republican votes in New Hampshire. So much for accuracy in results.
|
|
|
|
|
obermd wrote: So much for accuracy in results. Well, they accurately depicted the hopes of someone...
|
|
|
|