|
Article wrote: amid all the AI hype has Microsoft deprioritized the thing many of us depend on every day?
Seeing how many news of things getting broke, non asked features that biggest part won't ever use and (intentionally?) complicating easy things...
I am not sure where to classify that quote: Bad or Good news?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
No. They are totally focused on Windows Cloud.
|
|
|
|
|
I disagree with the article. Most of the examples he cited were problems caused by non-Microsoft applications behaving badly during installation, run-time, or both.
How the ![Elephant | [mastadon]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/elephant.gif) is Microsoft responsible for fixing that?
(I'm completely ignoring the fact the moron has a 256GB C: drive)
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft need to step up and refuse to certify for Windows any hardware where the installers don't properly clean up older version. Oracle got into huge problems with Java because they weren't cleaning up older versions during upgrades. All vendors should be given the short notice that failure to clean up when they upgrade will result in their product installers being blocked by default on Windows.
This goes for applications as well. Office used to be a huge abuser of disk space but at least now cleans up after itself. Chrome doesn't. I've seen 500 GB hard drives fill up with Chrome generated temp files.
|
|
|
|
|
New AI Services policies also prohibit any reverse engineering and data collection of its products "The Great Eye is ever watchful."
|
|
|
|
|
may? Ha
and even being enterprise, they save a lot of data that are more than questionable
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: New AI Services policies also prohibit any reverse engineering and data collection of its products
Well that's not one-sided! Pretty soon the CEO's in charge of that crap will be happy to put 'Arbeit macht frei' on their doors. I know that is a long stretch, but they take everything we do regardless of whether we give them permission or not, and use it to cut jobs while automating more and more.  
|
|
|
|
|
Absolutely right!
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Redis is continuing that spirit with all the innovation we put into Redis 7.2. Now even more redisish!
Bonus marks if you can figure out just what Redis does only by reading this article. (he eventually does get to it)
|
|
|
|
|
Where is that Google AI for the TL;DR; when one needs it?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Biomechanical models that learn like humans could help robots and avatars Does this mean it's going to start leaking fluids everywhere?
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, as long as it does not start dropping solids everywhere, I am fine. If it starts dropping solids, then I will need to find a way off this rock.
Game over, man!!
|
|
|
|
|
We’re interested in how “developer enablement” tools of all sorts are changing the workplace. developer++
|
|
|
|
|
Researchers discovered 120,000 infected systems that contained credentials for cybercrime forums. Many of the computers belong to hackers, the researchers say. Who will hack the hackers?
Apparently these guys
"Analyzing the data, threat researchers found that the passwords used for logging into hacking forums were generally stronger than those for government websites." <-- I'd hope so, but I imagine that's a low bar to get over
|
|
|
|
|
Endly a good use for security researches... Yohoo ![Jig | [Dance]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/jig.gif) ![Badger | [badger,badger,badger,badger...]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/badger.gif)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: According to Hudson Rock, most of the infections were from just three info-stealers, which also happen to be popular choices with many hackers: RedLine, Raccoon, and Azorult.
Almost like having that software on your system will cause it to steal your information! Who would have thunk?
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
The experimental feature is a lot like Microsoft's Copilot. tl;dr
|
|
|
|
|
Blinkist for webs?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
While neuroscience as a field has exploded over the last 20 to 30 years, almost none of these more recent breakthroughs are evident in today’s A.I. systems. But we'll lose the chrome plating and whitewalls
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Imagine what A.I. could do if it incorporates the latest breakthroughs
Not sure if I would like to know that...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Here we see the dissonance between language models and artificial intelligence. ChatGPT is NOT A.I..
|
|
|
|
|
86% of Americans believe AI could accidentally cause a catastrophic event. That should kill it!
|
|
|
|
|
could?
...
accidentally?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
This could inadvertently lead to regulating software development more generally.
How do you know any given software is not driven by AI in whole or part?
We're more than willing to twist facts when it comes to achieving our desires and the majority don't know the facts about this stuff anyway.
What even constitutes AI? I think there's definitely rogue AI behind a bunch of DRM like printers requiring branded ink cartridges. Don't like the app? Kill it by association. The gig economy got you down? They're all probably using AI somewhere... or will be, but it doesn't matter, just say they are!
|
|
|
|
|
AMD's new survey of 2,500 global IT leaders reveals most regard AI tools positively, even though over half haven't personally used them yet. After all, it should only increase bugs 48% or so
"Even though over half haven't personally used them yet." <-- but let's jump on that bandwagon!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
