|
Seeing as how it seems like it's part of the pre-install fluff, they might actually make that difficult.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
I would not expect anything else. If it was easy, why would they do it?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
After the Boeing Starliner spacecraft’s thruster, valve, and helium issues, it will return to Earth without the two astronauts onboard. Better late than never
Good job, Boeing. Episode too many to count
|
|
|
|
|
Several months more than expected, the astronauts will need a big recovery when they land...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I was kinda hoping that first they would send all of Boeing's upper management up to get them first, in a quick Boeing built custom craft designed for the job. But they should probably do it synchronously, to improve the odds of getting the astronauts back.
|
|
|
|
|
The last number I heard was 1 in 780 for a failure of the Starliner, so I guess they decided not to risk it (or that denominator got smaller). This gives them until February to figure out a solution so that the Boeing suits work with the SpaceX vehicle[^].
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like a bunch of blind people trying to lead an elephant.
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect SpaceX will be making suits for them. NASA already has their size information as well as their backup suits (at least two flight suits are made for each astronaut in case one fails safety checks).
|
|
|
|
|
David O'Neil wrote: I was kinda hoping that first they would send all of Boeing's upper management on a one-way ticket to the Moon
FTFY
How dare those corporate bastards risk people's lives merely so their bonus isn't cut for the year?
David A. Stewart – One Way Ticket to the Moon Lyrics | Genius Lyrics
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
NASA should return the Starliner to Boeing
... under RMA, or not
... directly to the CEO suite
They should also send Boeing an invoice for all of the extra costs of supporting the astronauts and returning them via alternate methods.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: They should also send Boeing managers an invoice for all of the extra costs of supporting the astronauts and returning them via alternate methods. FTFY
as long as the company pays, they won't give a rat crap. They only care when they own pocket is in risk.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Starliner's costs have been coming out of Boeing's pockets for over three years now. Starliner was a fixed cost contract so once the NASA (government) money was spent Boeing had to pay for everything. Boeing's filings with the SEC indicate they've spent close to a billion dollars of their own money on Starliner.
|
|
|
|
|
Still company money, not managers private money
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm hoping Starliner burns up on reentry.
- Boeing only has 6 Atlas rockets set aside for future Starliner missions
- Boeing doesn't have any backup capsules.
A destroyed Starliner will effectively end Boeing's participation in the Commercial Crew program. A successful return would potentially put future astronauts at risk with this capsule.
This makes me wonder if Artemis, also built by Boeing, will be truly reusable. We already know the Artemis (SLS) heat shield barely survived reentry and NASA and Boeing are relooking at the heat shield design and materials.
|
|
|
|
|
A newly discovered bug causes iPhones and iPads to briefly crash. All you need to trigger the bug are just four characters. You're typing them wrong
|
|
|
|
|
|
.i..
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It's not a bug, it's an undocumented feature - "How to restart your iPhone user interface."
|
|
|
|
|
Work could lead to new "smart" materials that can learn and adapt to their environment. Coming soon: lipids that play DOOM
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft has confirmed that the venerable Windows Control panel will finally be put out to pasture in favor of a shiny new Settings app. Did they just change the title bar finally?
It's only been trying since Win8
Also: "That will get them to upgrade!"
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Also: "That will get them to upgrade!" Are you sure?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't worry - they will stick to items from comctrl32 ver 5.82, so people don't go into too much shock.
|
|
|
|
|
MSVC Code Analysis is a static analysis tool that checks your code for errors, potential improvements, and adherence to coding best practices when using the Microsoft Visual C++ (MSVC) compiler. It's OK with non-critical bugs?
|
|
|
|
|
The .NET team has been working on a new experiment called async2, which is a new implementation of the async/await pattern that is designed to be more efficient and more flexible than the current implementation. Don't let me interrupt you while you await this
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder how much of that has to do with interactions with test frameworks/suites.
Ran into something odd this week where the fix was the classic wait
await Task.Delay(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1)); Since it is only in a test, not so bad. There was a time it would've bugged me enough to figure out where things were going south with threading.
However much I do love some black boxes - that's a chief feature of a good one... You never notice it is one because you never need to look so far inside anyway.
If Redmond is still not so sure it's all it could be, I'd be inclined to agree.
|
|
|
|