|
Kent Sharkey wrote: But tests on prod?!? What's the difference with test on customers or on users?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
True, but we should act better than Microsoft, shouldn’t we?
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
If it only were MS
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe wonky... Kind of depends on some kind of risk assessment matrix.
We run some postmen against at least one API as a part of the deployment pipe and it happens in every environ. If they don't pass, rolling the deploy back immediately is two clicks.
At the same time, the ingress point is the same, but the traffic is being routed to two sets of servers. The load balancer will know if one doesn't respond and send the request to the other.
To the user, this should be nearly/totally invisible, even if we broke it.
|
|
|
|
|
Remember, everyone has a test system. Lucky developers also have a production system.
|
|
|
|
|
.NET Generic Math makes it possible to perform mathematical operations generically, meaning you don’t need to know the exact type you’re working with Something from something leaves something
|
|
|
|
|
Article wrote: meaning you don’t need to know the exact type you’re working with This is going to be fun when people start using mixed types...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
This just in: Microsoft finally discovers abstraction.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft recently launched Trusted Signing in Public Preview, a fully managed end-to-end signing solution for developers backed by a Microsoft-managed certification authority. Sign on the dotted app
|
|
|
|
|
Only some days behind the "we will increase security"?
Why do I expect you reporting this topic again in a couple of weeks and not exactly for the positive effect it might have?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
A Johns Hopkins-led team found that chatbots reinforce our biases, providing insight into how AI could widen the public divide on controversial issues At least that's what it told me
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, so Facebook and other social media are AI now. Got it.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, you have been on FB or Xitter lately? They do seem pretty infested with chatbots.
But I think this study is more the chatgpts of the interwebs
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Chatbots tell people what they want to hear I already have some colleagues at work for that...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Siri and Alexa never managed to be useful assistants. But Google and others are convinced the next generation of bots is really going to work. It's going to kill Gemini before Gemini kills Assistant
Which means they should have a new AI next week to kill this
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: It's going to kill Gemini before Gemini kills Assistant Kind of rings a bell[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Free for personal use, but businesses will have to fork over $120 per year. The first hit is (virtually) free
|
|
|
|
|
I suppose they market share got reduced after the try of making everyone pay for it.
What's worse than customers running away?
That they not come back .i..
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
As AI becomes more prevalent, the complexities that come with deploying all of that really becomes harder, becomes greater, and we wanted to help solve that challenge Try it before they cancel it
|
|
|
|
|
|
You are the urban spaceman, baby!
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Meh. It's just code. I guess the real point is that the size of the display they use for presentations keeps getting bigger and bigger. The bigger, the more important? (And I'm specifically omitting the obvious comment about size.)
|
|
|
|
|
We spotted a session listing titled “Use AI for “real things” in your Windows Apps” on the official sessions page. This developer-focused session will contain back-to-back demos on how to use AI for real-world applications in Windows apps. "I don't know what's real anymore"
|
|
|
|
|
'Ads are the bedrock of reality' - somebody somewhere
|
|
|
|
|
Google's Gemini AI often just feels like a chatbot built into a text-input field, but you can really start to do special things when you give it access to a ton of data. Gemini in Gmail will soon be able to search through your entire backlog of emails and show a summary in a sidebar. It looks like you're writing an email. Would you like advertisements for that?
|
|
|
|