|
Kent Sharkey wrote: I’m a little surprised that there hasn’t been an oops moment yet, People usually are afraid / cautious with new things. There must already have been some, but still small enough to not do it to the mainstream.
It has been over a year and the chat bots are really making advances, but they still are only helpers. As a tool to increase productivity, yeah, I can buy that, anything more than that, specially creativity, different perspective adoption to solve problems... definitively not for a while.
But we already know there are enough managers out there that will buy it and fire most of their IT / dev people, because AI can do it better and faster. When that happens, it will last not so long until the big OOOPS comes.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: As a tool to increase productivity, yeah, I can buy that, anything more than that, specially creativity, different perspective adoption to solve problems... definitively not for a while.
Thus far, I've found them useful/helpful on coding and other technical tasks - sometimes even when they are wrong.
E.g., a while back I fired a math question at one of the AIs, from a course I'd been taking because I didn't fully understand it. The AI explained it a bit better but actually got its calculation wrong! But I was able to see from its correct explanation why it had got its answer wrong. I then told it so and it corrected itself.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin McFarlane wrote: But I was able to see from its correct explanation why it had got its answer wrong. I then told it so and it corrected itself. If I had done the very same question a while later... would I had got the right answer?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
In theory you should! But I bet you wouldn't necessarily.
I find it odd, though, that when it gets it wrong you can sometimes just say you got this bit wrong and it will apologise and do it correctly! But then you wonder why it couldn't have self-checked somehow?
I guess that since it doesn't know that it's wrong the first time, it can't do anything until something tells it that it's wrong. Then I assume it must dig up some alternative algorithm.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin McFarlane wrote: a while back I fired a math question at one of the AIs, from a course I'd been taking because I didn't fully understand it. The AI explained it a bit better but actually got its calculation wrong! But I was able to see from its correct explanation why it had got its answer wrong. I then told it so and it corrected itself. Not too long ago I asked ChatGPT what the black marks on Japanese woman's foreheads meant in the older culture. It answered with the word for the Japanese tradition of blackening the teeth, which was also prevalent back then. So I googled, and found the right tradition, and said "don't you mean X?" and it gave me a breakdown between the words for both traditions, and hoped that it clarified the situation!
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft is also improving its widgets section in Windows 11 with the option to disable the feed of news. And now it's complete
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: with the option to disable the feed of news. endly something useful
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Light can be reflected not only in space but also in time—and researchers exploring such “time reflections” are finding a wealth of delightfully odd and useful effects First, you need a DeLorean
Well, maybe not 'need', but if you're going to do it, you might as well do it in style
|
|
|
|
|
I see it coming... after the lotery numbers are known, a lot of people with mirrors looking for the correct sunshine...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I can travel backwards in time, but somehow I always end up with a hangover...
|
|
|
|
|
Funny thing - getting the hangover before your night out.
|
|
|
|
|
Gotta stop driving the damn DeLorean!
|
|
|
|
|
Were you driving before getting drunk? How you dare?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I only drink re-annual wine - I get drunk before the grape vines are even planted!
The Oh-God of wine must really hate me...
(With apologies to Terry Pratchett)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
There was once a lady named Brite
Who could travel faster than light
She went off one day
In a relative way
And came back the previous night.
|
|
|
|
|
At Open Source Summit Japan, Linux and Git creator Linus Torvalds talked about Rust in Linux, Linux maintainer fatigue, and AI's future role in Linux and open-source development. Are we going to get The Year of AI on Linux?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Are we going to get The Year of AI on Linux? Will it make all the phones ring at once?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The present article delves into .NET Native AOT, uncovering how it works, its benefits, and the various scenarios where it finds application. Write once, run in one place
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: .NET Native Ahead-of-Time (AOT) compilation stands as a cutting-edge advancement within the .NET platform. With AOT the C# code is compiled to native code on the developer machine. This contrasts with the traditional method where code is compiled to native code during runtime. This article was written as though the audience was born yesterday. That's not a cutting-edge advancement. It's the way software had been produced for decades prior to the .NET Framework.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: That's not a cutting-edge advancement. It's the way software had been produced for decades prior to the .NET Framework. Which makes it cutting-edge for .NET!
|
|
|
|
|
I guess in a way that's sorta true.
But I also had a thought about the audience. If the reader is a twenty-something, then .NET might be all they know.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Everything old is new again.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft has added another feature to its long list of deprecated Windows features. If I knew that Vista had speech recognition, I wouldn't have yelled at it so much
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: I wouldn't have yelled at it so much Liar...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The rapid disruption of smaller galaxies suggests they lack a bit of dark matter. They taste better if you dunk them
|
|
|
|