|
Thank you for this answer, Chris.
It would explained it, but… there is no such file. And what if such file is irrelevant?
From the other hand, the problem has gone when after another change. In addition to removal of this tag, I changed subtopic from "General" to "Delegate". I don't know the ultimate reason for fixing those tags, but how that could be explained? The thing is: next article is going to be still "General" 
Thank you.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
I've obviously not had enough coffee. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
modified 13-Feb-17 17:00pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh Really?[^]
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
I need more coffee. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Seeing the wave of blind approvals and articles / blogs getting through moderation with problems in format and other issues...
Would it be a possibility to give no reputation points for the "approve" click?
I know that "friendly" votes will still remain, but I really think that the number of people approving items will reduce as soon as they realize that they don't get their points anymore.
Maybe that way the articles would remind a bit longer in moderation and have enouogh time to be actually corrected before they get published.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I definitely agree. Publishing badly formatted, non-finished articles is not helping anyone.
Personally I'd also remove the rep points from all reporting actions whether it's approval, format issues etc. Otherwise it could happen that the same people now approving the articles would start to report them, just for points.
|
|
|
|
|
Mika Wendelius wrote: Otherwise it could happen that the same people now approving the articles would start to report them, just for points.
a tiny clean up of the lists would not damage... but I see your point and I find it not a bad idea.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
should allow multiple answers. Even the question is asking in plural.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with this.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, dammit. I'm sick as a dog and barely thinking properly.
I'm going to nuke and rerun it.
Sorry about that.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Ah, dammit. I'm sick as a dog and barely thinking properly.
I hope is not bad and you recover soon
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
When pasting an url as http: all is ok, it automatically transformed to a link, as usual.
When pasting an url as https: nothing happen, it is like pasting normal text.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, I found the problem... I just disabled the ads. block on c.p site, and, works well!
|
|
|
|
|
ad blocker was on my browser from many months, but it never caused problem like this, i doubt there is something other going on which is causing the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
I am facing today a weird issue, when i try to update my article and the page opens in edit mode, i can modify title, tags, section etc, but the article content box displays empty and is not editable, is it known problem which is currently being addressed?
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please provide a link to your article?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Are you using uBlock (or another ad/script blocker)? I had to disable it for the site. This is what it was blocking @Chris-Maunder
Picture[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, Is there any interest among Code Project folk for new topic on simulation / emulation / gaming programming languages such as CACI's 'Simscript' or Improbable's 'SpatialOS'?
Sorry, I'm new to Code Project so may just have missed seeing the appropriate place .. 
These languages have some programming constructs all of their own (such as event-driven triggers), as well as the usual sort of object-based classes etc.
The two I've mentioned have some similarities with the issues you have to deal with when building an operating system (conditional interrupts, resource-aware calls etc).
Ciao!
|
|
|
|
|
I changed my visible name (nickname), but I saw that didn't change in all pages. I can see the old nickname in my last Tip/Trick.
Is it normal? Is it take more than 10 minutes to do effective?
|
|
|
|
|
The old names remain on old postings.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know if I'm mistaken, but it looks like you are changing my blog posts ("technical blog") to regular codeproject articles.
Please stop do that.
When I write blog posts they are typically smaller and not as carefully crafted as regular articles (which takes more time to write). When you change my blog posts to articles you also increase the expectation the user has. So if they want to read a complete article and get a blog post rewrapped as an article is more likely that they will get disappointed.
I would rather that you removed my blog posts instead of converting them.
modified 12-Feb-17 2:47am.
|
|
|
|
|
Technical blogs are meant to be held to the same standard as a tip or article. If your blog posts are not ready to be posted as an article then either you can simply not mark them as consumable or we can disable your feed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
On the other hand... it happens sometimes that when a blog post gets edited, it is changed to article.
Trying to change it back to blog is not possible because the option is not even in the dropdown possibilities for "type"
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I've fixed the only entry I found of yours that was an article that should have been a blog entry. If you catch any others, please let me know.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
