|
When you view an article published in CodeProject and want to see the profile of the author, you click on his name beneath the Article caption. But this is navigating to the list of articles published by him and again, I have to scroll down in the page to view his Online Profile.
The specified link itself can be made to hyperlink to his Online Profile. Isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
This is by design
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
But then, a direct link to UserProfile page can also be facilitated. Isn't it? That would enhance the user experience greatly. 
|
|
|
|
|
Can we have an XNA category added? I am planning on submitting some XNA articles. They would apply to both C#, Windows and XBox-360.
If there is one already (and I am just missing it) let me know!
Thanks,
Bob Bradley
|
|
|
|
|
|
While I agree that articles specific to the XBox-360 platform might come under hardware, I think that XNA still deserves its own category. XNA is a set of software tools that make developing games and multimedia applications a lot easier. XNA is build on top of the .NET 2.0 Framework, but it includes its own environment and additional libraries. Currently only C# is officialy supported by XNA, but technically any .NET language should be able to work under it. The neat part is that programs written to XNA can be compiled to run under both Windows and XBox-360.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks! That sounds great!
|
|
|
|
|
In 'Suggestions and Bug Reports' problems, since it encompasses both suggestions and bug reports, along with the routine links, I think there should be some way the user should be able to indicate the following:
1) User-Friendliness
2) Cosmetic
3) ShowStopper
4) Casual Bug
5) Irritant Bug
1) and 2) applies for Suggestions
3), 4) and 5) applies for Bugs.
|
|
|
|
|
More clutter for a very debatable improvement. No.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
And interestingly, I found my original message in 'Suggestions' forum voted low (4 votes). It was just my opinion/feedback anyway. 
|
|
|
|
|
You're asking a lot of users who can't even post in the correct forum...
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: You're asking a lot of users who can't even post in the correct forum...
True. We have a significant amount of users who just loiter around the forums, littering any of the forum which they can victimize at thier own whims and fancies. 
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I'm allways wondering why answers are downvoted.
Therefore I placed a suggestion[^]some day ago.
But now it came to my mind, that maybe some of these votes were not on purpose.
So I looked at the short description : "Rate this message: 1 2 3 4 5 (out of 5)", and I remembered as I started posting on this forum it took me a little while to understand this.
For people who's english is not that good, "(out of 5)" is not very easy to understand.
There would be the possibility to give examples like: "(1..poor, 5..excellent)".
Or, like nearly all other forums, give symbolic help.
Five stars or Five Bobs (CP alien)!
There was an additional confusion for me, cause in our school system a "1" is excellent and "5" is poor.
All the best,
Martin
|
|
|
|
|
True. Instead of cryptic notations which might turn ambiguous in different cultures and also for different people, we can try to be as clear.
Another example I like to quote is US Traffic Signals.
1) One of the most common traffic signals found in British Indian systems are 'No Entry'. But in US, they always have it like 'Do not Enter' and even within the roads, on both the sides 'Wrong Way' signal flanks the road.
2) We have cryptic 'Zebra-Crossings' but I felt that in US, the pedestrian crossing has a distinct White light (WALK) signal and Red light (STOP) signal showing a man.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like, there was again a missunderstanding, in which meaning so ever!
Got my '5' to bring it back in shap.
Wow, looks like it was a platinum member! (2.3 from 2 votes)
And it again shows for me the need of (not anonym) voting statements.
All the best,
Martin
|
|
|
|
|
The addition of a "thumbs up / thumbs down" icon was suggested earlier and will be added.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Very Good!
All the best,
Martin
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: "thumbs up / thumbs down" icon
A picture is worth thousand words and I am sure this would be a good value-addition.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris,
Using the icons takes language out of the equation. That should work well (unless of course we are in ancient Rome where 'thumbs down' was a good thing).
Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
"You can't vote for messages posted using your IP address" might not be applicable in many places in India.
Reasons:
There are even some cable ISPs who mask many providers behind a single IP address.
Suggested Workaround:
A combination of cookie + logged on user account + session + time stamp can be used to fix this bug.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes you are correct. In my office we have a shared internet connection. Single line is shared on all systems. So outgoing IP will be same for all systems. CP's restriction allows any one in the whole company to vote. Other's can't vote for the same message 
|
|
|
|
|
I think the current approach would be using REMOTE_ADDR. I would suggest HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR give the IP address of the actual web browser system behind the proxy/firewall. Isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
It's not a bug, it's by design.
cookie == session, and a cookie is deletable which completely defeats the purpose. New accounts can also be created which again defeats the purpose.
Having some people miss out on being able to vote is better than allowing many others to unfairly cast multiple votes.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: cookie == session, and a cookie is deletable which completely defeats the purpose. New accounts can also be created which again defeats the purpose.
I agree that each of the parameters has loopholes.
Chris Maunder wrote: Having some people miss out on being able to vote is better than allowing many others to unfairly cast multiple votes.
  Looks bad though. But I understand that at least the integrity of the system is maintained. It was always involves a tradeoff in a way or another though. 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
