|
If someone doesn't mind to get contacted through privatelly, then you should see:
in all his / her forum messages.
When you write an email using that option, the other person will get the message with the email address you used to register here in CP. If he / she wants to answer back using the email... voilà. You have successfully started a private email conversation 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, it's only available for Protectors.
Look in your homepage, the "Privileges" tab; near the bottom is the "Have the ability to send direct emails to members in the forums" option.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
If a user has this checked in his own settings, the "email" link appears right to the "reply" link... doesn't it?
I have received emails from people that were not protectors or with very very low reputation.
I can't check because I have no other account and if I log off, then I see nothing, not even the reply. Only the "sign in // view thread" options
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it changed in the last couple of years.
It's quite likely it was being abused - you know what kind of people we get here sometimes.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: I think it changed in the last couple of years.
Didn't notice it.
OriginalGriff wrote: It's quite likely it was being abused - you know what kind of people we get here sometimes.
Yeah I know, those kind of emails were the one or two messages from people with very low reputation I got
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it did not changed basically.
Before a longer time, it was enabled by the default.
What then changed before some years (1, 2, 3?) was, that value was set back to disabled and one has to enable that option expliciltely.
modified 27-Feb-23 14:16pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 22-Feb-23 10:06am.
|
|
|
|
|
I have been holding off asking this question for quite some time...'
Is there any reason why Code Project is not being fed into daily.dev | Where developers grow together[^] news feed?
This would be great exposure for the website and content authors.
Graeme
"I fear not the man who has practiced ten thousand kicks one time, but I fear the man that has practiced one kick ten thousand times!" - Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
I honestly don't know
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Are you thinking about doing it?
Graeme
"I fear not the man who has practiced ten thousand kicks one time, but I fear the man that has practiced one kick ten thousand times!" - Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
For all 100 articles the number of views = 0
1.
Popularity: 16.38
Rating: 4.85/5
Votes: 2,378
Views: 0
2.
Popularity: 13.91
Rating: 4.94/5
Votes: 650
Views: 0
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed. Will deploy shortly
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you. 
|
|
|
|
|
It seems that Top Rank Articles doesn't list any of the top one. By example, my Chess Program in C# was rated third or four in the list and is not anymore in the top 100. Is it a bug or did the algorithm has been changed?
Jacques Fournier
Consyst SQL Inc.
www.consyst-sql.com
|
|
|
|
|
We have a bug. If you check the "include updated articles" then your article appears as #2.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I cannot find any "include updated articles" in the page. Also, the "Order by" combo box doesn't do anything.
Jacques Fournier
Consyst SQL Inc.
www.consyst-sql.com
|
|
|
|
|
Just wanted to let you know that I'm experiencing issues with the Top Ranked Articles page as well.
For me, every way of filtering or ordering on that page is broken.
It just doesn't change anything.
I can't find an option to include updated articles either.
|
|
|
|
|
Missed that one. We'll get this fixed soon.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to import another article from github repo and half of my images are broken.
curry-console[^]
Gives me a headache trying to fix the broken links from an automated import tool. Is this a test?
.'\ /`.
.'.-.`-'.-.`.
..._: .-. .-. :_...
.' '-.(o ) (o ).-' `.
: _ _ _`~(_)~`_ _ _ :
: /: ' .-=_ _=-. ` ;\ :
: :|-.._ ' ` _..-|: :
: `:| |`:-:-.-:-:'| |:' :
`. `.| | | | | | |.' .'
`. `-:_| | |_:-' .'
`-._ ```` _.-'
``-------'</p
|
|
|
|
|
I will try and schedule time this week to get this fixed. My apologies. We've been crazy busy the last couple of weeks.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I've made a fix to GitHub import that should help. It'll go live next deploy
I've added a Github Markdown Formatter tool which allows you to paste in the Markdown from your README file and view it transformed, cleaned and rendered so you can debug before making updates.
cheers
Chris Maunder
modified 21-Feb-23 22:11pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Chris, I will test it out on next article update and tell you the results.
.'\ /`.
.'.-.`-'.-.`.
..._: .-. .-. :_...
.' '-.(o ) (o ).-' `.
: _ _ _`~(_)~`_ _ _ :
: /: ' .-=_ _=-. ` ;\ :
: :|-.._ ' ` _..-|: :
: `:| |`:-:-.-:-:'| |:' :
`. `.| | | | | | |.' .'
`. `-:_| | |_:-' .'
`-._ ```` _.-'
``-------'</p
|
|
|
|
|
The QA page shows the time a question was posted, and the tags associated with it, but no indication about which member asked the question. I can think of arguments both for and against adding the member name (and maybe a link with hover) to the main page. It might be argued that not knowing who posted the question might mean more people will look at it. On the other hand, knowing who asked the question might help those who are likely to respond to given question to decide if it's something they want to do.
Keep Calm and Carry On
|
|
|
|
|
k5054 wrote: knowing who asked the question might help those who are likely to respond to given question to decide if it's something they want to do.
Why? I can't think of a single reason that knowing the OP name would persuade me to look at a question. I can think of reasons why knowing a name might dissuade some people from looking - but most of those are probably based on assumptions about race and / or gender from the given name, which I don't think we really want here.
So why add it? When do you think it will encourage people to give help they otherwise might not?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
