|
It's fast and it's correct.
Thanks Chris & team
Nick
----------------------------------
Be excellent to each other
|
|
|
|
|
Thank Elina for that one.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much Elina
Nick
----------------------------------
Be excellent to each other
|
|
|
|
|
My pleasure
Sincerely,
Elina
Life is great!!!
Enjoy every moment of it!
|
|
|
|
|
Absolute star.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks - all fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Is it me or is the response time to posting messages and switching forums very sporadic at the moment?
|
|
|
|
|
I've checked all the servers and nothing overly terrible is happening at the moment.
Is it just slow responses, or timeout errors?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris,
It's very strange it seems to be taking an age to respond, but never actually times out - I get tired of waiting and stop it. But then I switch elsewhere and it seems fine for a while. I am not getting this with other sites I visit, including another one in Canada so it seems to be CP only.
Richard
|
|
|
|
|
Curiouser and curiouser ...
The problem still seems to be occurring; I am using Firefox 3.5.4 on Windows 7. I was previously on Windows 7 RC with FF 3.5.x (not sure what x ws). However, when I switch rendering to IE Tab within FireFox it seems to work fine, so it definitely looks like a FireFox problem.
|
|
|
|
|
... is all clumped together now. Is this by design or a bug?
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Oh..so that has changed. I came home from office and logged in. I felt something is different than what I saw in office. Then thought may be I am wrong.
It's not necessary to be so stupid, either, but people manage it. - Christian Graus, 2009 AD
|
|
|
|
|
If it's by design, can I vote that it's changed back. I think it makes navigating around a little more difficult.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I quite like it. All it needs now is the ability to hide or reorder the items and I'm set.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry guys - not sure what happened but will get it sorted.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Without a box around it, there's nothing to indicate that it isn't static text until you over your mouse over it on he setting page.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
I'll add some text to make it clearer.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
A thought has occurred to me whilst perusing The Lounge.
<Eeyore Mode>
It has probably been suggested before, I never have any original ideas.
Almost certainly no one will agree with me either, nobody ever likes my ideas.
</Eeyore Mode>
Anyway, here goes. In The Lounge, and The Lounge only, is there any value in making a 1 vote a 1 vote regardless of the status of the voter, and obviously a 5 vote a 5 vote.
With the Reputation Scheme being a distinct possibility, a poster only has to upset a higher ranking member for it to take a disproportionate number of high votes to get a real picture of how a post is really perceived. On the same basis it might be a case for a simple 'Good Post/Bad Post' mechanism.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Minute wrote: With the Reputation Scheme being a distinct possibility, a poster only has to upset a higher ranking member for it to take a disproportionate number of high votes to get a real picture of how a post is really perceived. On the same basis it might be a case for a simple 'Good Post/Bad Post' mechanism
The current system already weights votes disproportionally. A Gold member has way, way more voting weight than a bronze member.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
That is what I mean. For The Lounge it seems to me that a members status should not alter the weight of the vote cast. A 1 should be a 1 and a 5 should be a 5, no weighting.
Only in The Lounge though.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
Would it be possible to implement the same functionality for article voting to the forum responses. i.e explain why a 1 or bad question vote was given. The goal would be to possibly stop the petty down votes or at least identify patterns. People are less likely to give "because I don't like you" votes when they actually have to explain it and be identified.
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
Only if the removal threshhold is significantly lowered and all My Vote to Remove messages are deleted with the original.
I really don't want to see the below vomited all over the lounge whenever our most obnoxious soapbox troll crawls out from under his rock.
Random Subject - The Troll (message contents: something offensive)
My Vote to Remove - Regular member 1 (message contents: keep it in the soapbox)
My Vote to Remove - Regular member 2 (message contents: you're an idiot)
My Vote to Remove - Regular member 3 (message contents: go away!!)
My Vote to Remove - Regular member 4 (message contents: SOAPBOX!!!!!)
My Vote to Remove - Regular member 5 (message contents: TROLL!!!!)
My Vote to Remove - Regular member 6 (message contents: Enough already)
The latest nation. Procrastination.
|
|
|
|
|
I have to agree with Dan.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|