|
Check this post[^]  ans tell me what you think about it ...
~RaGE();
|
|
|
|
|
I checked this post and followed some of the previous and following posts. I think it is a good idea to have the requester be able to indicate whether or not the question has been adequately answered, but I think there is one flaw in the process. The flaw is that the requester must go back and indicate that the question has been answered. If he fails to do this, then even answered questions will still be viewed by others as not having been answered. As we read through those, we all will get frustrated, the system will be broken, and no one will use it.
If, as I suggested, we can see posts that have no response, then there is a 100% probability that the question has not been answered. Unfortunately, the flaw here is that even if a response is made, the question may still not be answered. As I indicated, those people who post responses that say "I do not know" need to learn some serious multi-user bulletin-board request/response etiquette.
Interesting problem, though, with no clear easy solution.
Dave
"You can say that again." -- Dept. of Redundancy Dept.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently when somebody replies to your posting and you have the email notifications on, you get an email with the reply and with a link which contains the message. In this email notification the email address of the person who posted the message is exposed. I would assume that it should be kept private!
Regards,
Victor
phpWebNotes is a page annotation system modelled after php.net.
http://webnotes.sourceforge.net/demo.php[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Suggestion for the link / link[^] tool:
After converting the selection to a link, make the "inner part" selected - so we can just start typing "Clickety". Like this:
If I could find a souvenir / just to prove the world was here [sighist]
|
|
|
|
|
I saw lot of CPians suggested their suggestions.
I wonder anybody keep track of them? 
or
Are they just ignored? 
or
Is any surprise  element included?
Is there a list which we can see? (Ex: Feasible/Not Feasible, Coming Soon....)
Kant
Sonork-100.28114
Don't ![Beer | [beer]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif) and Drive.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris does keep a list, but it's a long list and he's a very busy man. He also likes to suprise us with new functionality and also not make promises he won't be able to keep to.
Michael
Fat bottomed girls
You make the rockin' world go round -- Queen
|
|
|
|
|
Every suggestion made here or emailed to me is considered. Those that I think will benifit CodeProject are scored according to certain criteria (value to members, cost to implement etc) and are then given a ranking. There are currently 131 items on the list.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think Chris posted a trick answer Nish
First he said yes or aye
and then
Chris Maunder wrote:
There are currently 131 items on the list.
So he said Aye Queue 131 or IQ 131 which isn't bad for a math guy. 
Regardz
Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
You are the intrepid one, always willing to leap into the fray! A serious character flaw, I might add, but entertaining.
Said by Roger Wright about me.
|
|
|
|
|
I've noticed a trend for CPians to be wishing to have local meetings, ( beers with other Geeks ).
As a suggestion could a facility be set up on CP as to where && when each meeting will be.
That way a CPian can initiate a meeting and it won't add to the clutter of the Lounge and need repeating every 12 hrs.
Regardz
Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
You are the intrepid one, always willing to leap into the fray! A serious character flaw, I might add, but entertaining.
Said by Roger Wright about me.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll second this suggestion - it sounds like a good idea.
How about a "Meetings" page, with upcoming events displayed on the front page?
---
|
|
|
|
|
Shog9 wrote:
with upcoming events displayed on the front page?
That sounds like a good idea.
Regardz
Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
You are the intrepid one, always willing to leap into the fray! A serious character flaw, I might add, but entertaining.
Said by Roger Wright about me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I will leave it to the Site Builders to decide how it should be done. But I think it is a good idea.
Regards,
Victor.
phpWebNotes is a page annotation system modelled after php.net.
http://webnotes.sourceforge.net/demo.php[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I've seen lots of other sites have calendar pages that let people add events on to them (guess you just need a messageboard per day, which automatically get purged after the date has passed)
--
Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some people are just hunting for new forums to increase their post count 
Kannan
|
|
|
|
|
Less a question then a fact. CP has normaly no border around the pages but the message bord pages have a 3px white border (I didnt notice this until recently). Looks ugly. (and yes, I am using IE6 - not a 'unsupported' html-visualizer-thingy)
I don't think this is a serious possesion, and the evil most likely comes from your hand. Colin J Davies, The Lounge
|
|
|
|
|
Rickard Andersson@Suza Computing
C# and C++ programmer from SWEDEN!
UIN: 50302279
E-Mail: nikado@pc.nu
Speciality: I love C#, ASP.NET and C++!
|
|
|
|
|
I've seen a few threads as of late complaining about the quality of newer articles. I'll agree that, by numbers alone, there are a lot more stinkers around than there used to be. I think that this means it is time to get rid of the '10 latest articles' section and replace it with a '10 latest good articles' section. The signal-to-noise ratio has gotten such that this is simply a necessity.
This will require that a new group of CP volunteers will have to be created for the sole purpose of reviewing articles and deciding which ones get front page billing. We already have volunteer editors and site maintainers, and I am confident that some of the high calibre, well-known CP members can do an excellent job with this.
When an article was positioned for possible review (ie it is added or updated significantly), the reveiwing team would look it over, rate it internally, and decide whether or not to give it front billing. In addition, the reviewers would comment on why something was good or bad, which would make the ratings actually useful.
I like this system much more than the current '10 latest articles' system because some filtering is performed, and I like it better than the 'Top 3 rated articles' because it will be more than 3 articles, and the ratings will come from a panel of known and well respected CP members (instead of random anonymouse twerps).
What are your thoughts?
--
Russell Morris
"Have you gone mad Frink? Put down that science pole!"
|
|
|
|
|
Russell Morris wrote:
What are your thoughts?
I think a more distributed (i.e. not hand picked reviewers) system needs implementing.
CP has this amazingly unique system which allows anyone to post any article and have it viewable to 100,000 members, and millions of others.
The editors already "filter" in a way by editing and promoting to categorised status only those articles they deem worthy. That works fine and does not go against CP's open system because it is not rating, it is editing. Sure it is a tacit nod of approval, but still not a direct rating.
But to appoint a "rating and review board" seems to me so against the whole power of 100,000 members and millions of visitors. We need to harness them more effectively. Out of 100,000 you will get trends and worthy articles will rise through good ratings.
I agree though that the Latest 10 list needs to be suplemented with a longer Latest Top 10 list. We must not remove the Latest 10 though because for ratings to work you need people to read and rate the articles. i.e. be informed that there is a new article.
It is a tough one to crack. No other site has managed it. Though /. and K5 have reasonably well working systems IMO, not perfect, but good enough to work from.
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
Everybody just wants to be naked and famous, Paul.
|
|
|
|
|
I like this idea.
Instead of replacing the top 10 latest with the top 10 greatest, we need to see both.
I don't think we need a panel of experts to rate the articles though. Just let CP's rating system work.
Jason Henderson
start page ; articles
henderson is coming
henderson is an opponent's worst nightmare
* googlism *
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I think something like this is order.
Regardz
Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
You are the intrepid one, always willing to leap into the fray! A serious character flaw, I might add, but entertaining.
Said by Roger Wright about me.
|
|
|
|
|
Would it be too stressful for the server to replace < & > with < & > in posts and articles for code inside <pre> & <code> elements?
It would make life a lot easier for people who write the code and for those who're trying read other peoples code who hasn't used < and >.
--
Only in a world this sh*tty could you even try to say these were innocent people and keep a straight face.
|
|
|
|
|
If you're at it, disable smileys inside
tags as well...
<hr color="maroon"><small>If I could find a souvenir / just to prove the world was here [<a href="http://www.cherea.de/sighist.html" target="_blank">sighist</a>]</small>
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
