|
 , BTW is there a planned release date for this big re-write or is it a Microsoft-like release schedule? 
|
|
|
|
|
Internally, yes, but externally no. There's just no point in putting anymore pressure on the team than is necessary. It's taken so long to be able to get in the position where we have the luxury to concentrate solely on the rewrite that getting it done ASAP has become stressful in it's own right. We'd rather make sure we get it right and wait a few more weeks than rush something out.
I'd say it will be done Q2 2007 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I'd say it will be done Q2 2007
![Jig | [Dance]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/jig.gif) Just in time for my four weeks in hospitalised isolation, I'll have plenty of time to find bugs then 
|
|
|
|
|
Notice the date on which he announced the release date
|
|
|
|
|
Dammit, forgot about that, I only realised it was April 1st a few hours ago 
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, just search. Any chance we could have an option to search only on topmost posts? On occasion, I need to find a person's post that I know was top-level. Going through the list is usually tedious.
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't there already a Posts only selection under Search for?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I suggest this[^] section (C# Windows Forms) be retired as it doesn't seem to contain any articles.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a way to find these subcategories aside from changing the URL?
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: Is there a way to find these subcategories aside from changing the URL?
Yes[^].
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I need to get out of the lounge and soapbox more. 
|
|
|
|
|
I would say that this message 'Are you sure you want to navigate away from this page' should be a DIV popup instead of JavaScript. That way, CP can include a checkbox 'Don't show this warning in future'. These settings can later be revisited from User Profile settings.
|
|
|
|
|
Browsers don't all like that.
Brad
Australian
- Bradml on "MVP Status"
If this was posted in a programming board please rate my answer
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: I would say that this message 'Are you sure you want to navigate away from this page' should be a DIV popup instead of JavaScript. That way, CP can include a checkbox 'Don't show this warning in future'.
As Brad indicated, that's just not an option. Too many pop-up / malware pages abused the unload event for it to be any more powerful than a simple, one-time-only "are you sure" message.
Of course, Chris could conceivably "autosave" the post you were writing, allowing editing to be resumed if unintentionally interrupted...
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
|
|
|
|
|
Shog9 wrote: Chris could conceivably "autosave" the post you were writing, allowing editing to be resumed if unintentionally interrupted
Perhaps something similar to GMail. From compose window, you can click 'Discard' and then resume back by clicking 'Undo discard'. 
|
|
|
|
|
Would it be possible to not remove the javascript events (onclick, onload etc) if the tag begins with < or are in the PRE tags?
Brad
Australian
- unknown PHP Developer on "Job Prospect"
Requirement: * Experience working with XML, XSL, XPath
Comment: and other things starting with X.
|
|
|
|
|
I've had a go at making it more intelligent. Your suggestion of inserting a comment inside the <onX tag didn't work because a comment inside a tag screws things up. Thank Bob for ö.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Seams when you search for "HTTP" (in Visual C++ forum) you get a lot of hits. Maybe the search isn't working with this keyword?
|
|
|
|
|
I suggest those two links be combined into one "Inappropriate" link at the bottom of messages.
Having two is just bad UI design and there are a lot of cases where it's just not clear cut which it is.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. I've found myself wondering which one to choose.
|
|
|
|
|
If both links contribute towards getting the message removed, then I agree, we only need one.
|
|
|
|
|
The degree of reporting matters, I guess. Abuse might be intense and not tolerable. Spam, we got used to it and so Filter-And-Ignore. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was either a mistake eg, they clicked the submit button twice. Or because they didn't get enough people answering the question or the answer they got wasn't clear.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
Chris must have added it while I wasn't looking. Yay Chris. 