|
Hi All,
This one is not of much consequence (unless of course you are charged with the backup and disaster recovery plan at CodeProject).
I like to keep my articles tidy (including what is stored on the back end). It would be nice to be able to delete unused items.
Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
Added to TODO
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Was just browsing through the Links section at the very bottom of the General DotNet Articles Page (http://www.codeproject.com/dotnet/) and a lot of them point to "Page Not Found" or something similar.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems no one is checking them. There should be a utility that does it automatically.
|
|
|
|
|
An article is rendered 404 when it is moved from /useritems/ to an appropriate category and/or a similar move. At the same time, even the 404 page would be able to suggest you the location.
I think, the move operation has the issue of giving rise to 404s.
|
|
|
|
|
Once I voted 4 to an article which had already one with a 5. The average should have been 4.5 but it was 4.33 actually. Yet the number of votes was 2 (normal).
Is there an explanation ? Do I need glasses ?
|
|
|
|
|
Votes are weighted according to the voters member status. Platinum members have more weight applied to their votes than do gold, for instance.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's OK. With the votes both of those articles are getting, they won't be around long. 
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Friends,
Like others, Unix Group should also be there.
What u all say, Plz Comment ur views.
Thanks 
pooja
|
|
|
|
|
bpoojas wrote: What u all say, Plz Comment ur views.
First, please learn to write properly.
u --> you
plz --> please
ur --> your or you're
bpoojas wrote: Like others, Unix Group should also be there.
There are already many unix discussion groups on the internet. Why not use one of them.
Also, please look at the top of the page on the left. Where it says "You're Visual Studio and .NET Resource" - That gives you a hint about what this website concentrates on.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Sorry 4 using short cuts, but i think all were clear to you...
still uf you need to waste time in looking for errors in language here, then must say, programmers dont count Cosmetic errors, they are taken care of my admin/designer people. I mistakenly was discussing in similar manner.
Once again, i apologise for using Short Message Service language here in message board.
Thanks & Regards
pooja
|
|
|
|
|
bpoojas wrote: Sorry 4 using short cuts, but i think all were clear to you...
It is simply unprofessional. I don't want to spend extra time having to translate some "short cuts". I'd rather read well formed sentences. And the English language already has recognisable and gramatically correct ways of writing shortcuts. They are called contractions and come with an apostrophe.
|
|
|
|
|
bpoojas wrote: Sorry 4 using short cuts,
bpoojas wrote: still uf you need to waste time in looking for errors in language here, then must say, programmers dont count Cosmetic errors
 It has NOTHING to do with looking for errors. Using SMS speak makes your posts harder to read! Especially for people who don't speak English as their primary language.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: Using SMS speak makes your posts harder to read
Even those days have become bygone. With powerful dictionaries in the mobile, text messages do now can be well-formed valid English sentences without any obscurity or ambiguity of any kind. I don't think any providers in the word nowdays restrict the length of SMS too.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, the world needs yet another *nix discussion board. It's as if the other 25,000,000 boards out there haven't already discussed everything about *nix again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again ... continue until you puke.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, the world needs yet another *nix MS discussion board. It's as if the other 25,000,000 boards out there haven't already discussed everything about *nix MS again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again ... continue until you puke.
Trinity: Neo... nobody has ever done this before.
Neo: That's why it's going to work.
|
|
|
|
|
That would be funny if this was a Unix board, but since it's not... 
|
|
|
|
|
More people are confused about running *nix than almost any other OS I have ever seen. Linux has over 1,000 distributions and all are installed and configured differently. AND because almost all are not commercial, they have little to no support, so the little support you do get comes from inexperienced people that understand it just enough to barely set it up themselves. I have seen more people have Linux nightmares than anyone will ever see happen to Windows users. I may be a little bias, but this is the truth.
I know I am going to be slammed for this post but any Linux user than slams me for this is, for one, on the wrong forum  , two, most likely using a commercial distribution, or three, one of the people who can barely set it up themselves.
Good Day!
The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo
|
|
|
|
|
Well the people who can barley set them selves up are less experienced users who shouldn't be using Linux. Linux is more for power users, not the everyday user.
Trinity: Neo... nobody has ever done this before.
Neo: That's why it's going to work.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again
|
|
|
|
|
At least with respect to Web Development overlap, you can use 'Web Development' forum. PHP, Perl etc. are occasionally addressed here.
|
|
|
|
|
there's a malformed HREF in the link to the message in question. ex.:
Do not hit 'reply' to this email</i></b><i>: To reply, click <a target=_blankhref="http://www.codeproject.com/lounge.asp?msg=xxxxxxx#xxxxxxxxxxx">here</a>.</i></p>
there needs to be a space between the 'target=_blank' and the 'href='
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
