|
The absolute easiest thing to do is take your screenshot and just upload it. We take your uploads and automatically resize them (and also creative smaller images for responsive layouts like mobile devices) without you needing to do anything. A large image will be shown smaller, with a link that, when clicked, will show the original image full sized.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I just realized how this article[^] points to the other articles of the serie with the listbox on the upper right corner.
(Sorry I can't post the screenshot from here)
I don't know if the author did it or is a new feature of CP. But anyways I find it pretty cool. 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Glad you like it. It's a new Reading List feature we're rolling out. For now it's internal only but if things go well we'll open it up to authors (for their own series) and then anyone (to make your own reading lists)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
When a question has been edited the original poster's name, and the latest editor's names are showing as in the following image. The links remain correct and get back to the proper home pages.
[edit]
Strangely, some of them seem to be correcting themselves. Possible cache issue?
[/edit]
modified 4-Jun-20 7:41am.
|
|
|
|
|
Something similar on the article approval queue just now:
The article has the correct name:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
This should indicate that the Member's account was closed or otherwise made inactive.
That this is happening for active members tells me that we might have a problem.
I'll look into it.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Not just in QA:
The "Unknown Author" in that list are still alive as well.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
On submission, my articles keep getting tagged with
XML, Objective-C, Text, Markdown, yaml even though I clear them and don't ask for tags to be auto-filled. Something must be looking at the code .zip file and deciding that .md, .txt, and .vcxproj files call for these tags to be added. Not all the articles get all of these tags; some get a subset or none at all.
I would strongly suggest that, unless an article has provided no tags at all, its tags be left alone.
|
|
|
|
|
The first image (about halfway through) in this article[^] spills over the right margin, but all the others are OK. I thought I hadn't set its width properly, but it's the same as all the others. Then I figured maybe it was Firefox, but it's the same in Edge. And a preview of the article displays correctly!
|
|
|
|
|
All the images look correct (plenty of space to the right) to me on Chrome 83.0.4103.61.
|
|
|
|
|
That's curious, so I looked at the HTML source. The first image is called out very differently and has a width of 700 instead of the 600 that was set for it.
|
|
|
|
|
My mistake, I read your original question as "spills over the page". It is, as you say, 700 rather than 600 wide.
|
|
|
|
|
It seemed to have some margins on it? I think I fixed it.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I'm fairly certain it was the same as all the others: width=600, left margin=50, which centers it. It has a width of 700 and no margin now, so at least it doesn't go past the right margin. All the other ones were OK, but the HTML source for the first image was different in the preview and published versions. I guess we can wait and see what happens the next time the article is revised.
|
|
|
|
|
1. In the lounge, the top left "recent things" box is often "empty", as in it shows the "Loading" spinner for a few seconds, then says "No .... found".
2. In the forums, there is a \uFFFD replacement character in the bottom right corner, after "1 2 3 4 5 ... Next". I guess there's a speck of dirt in the source somewhere, upsetting UTF encoding.
Neither of these is a show-stopper, but if you're poking round...
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
It is currently 20:57 EDT and the home page is telling me that "1 item needs approval", namely this article[^]. If I click on its Revisions, it shows that it has been publicly available since 16:46 EDT. These mismatches started occurring recently, but this is the first time that I've seen one persist for this long.
EDIT: It's not a case of the article having been revised and resubmitted, because I noticed this when I approved it but received no reputation points.
modified 2-Jun-20 21:08pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I've been trying to catch one of these, but haven't been successful.
I'll keep trying, but if you see another, please tell me about it.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
OK, will do. I don't recall seeing one since.
|
|
|
|
|
Great. Chris was doing some work in that area, so he may temporarily over improved something 
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
The older you get the kinder your euphemisms
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
When you report an item, then the user is listed in the "approved by" list, although the user didn't click in "approve" but in something else.
I saw it first with @0x01AA and then it happened the same to me.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 2-Jun-20 15:11pm.
|
|
|
|
|
As I understand it, there is one list for all reports, positive or negative. I've seen examples of both appearing on the same list.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
The list in the top right as a popup (what now only shows the very last report and is already listed in the original bug report) usually shows everything, you are right.
I mean the list on the left, "the approved by" that usually displays only the approvals. And our report should not be there.
I think it is related, hence the "addition to bug" in my subject. But it might be a different issue.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 2-Jun-20 15:11pm.
|
|
|
|
|
It looks like Chris has applied the proper incantations and burnt the required herbs.
I think it is working correctly now.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
