|
|
Thanks.
Here is my reply to Chris without the three attachments:
Hi Chris,
I received 3 messages from Code Project this morning. All three are attached.
First, the problem of not getting a message is obviously solved.
The Test Message is the first message in a thread. I received one message.
The Selling Digital Downloads is not the first message of a thread. I received two almost identical messages. The only difference is the first line.
Member 12234973 has posted a reply to your message at "[Article]: Google Play In-App Billing Demo App":
Member 12234973 has posted a reply to a message at "[Article]: Google Play In-App Billing Demo App":
Have fun debugging.
Uzi
|
|
|
|
|
My LinkedIn profile url is Ravi Bhavnani | LinkedIn[^]. When I enter this in my Settings | Professional Profile, it's saved as https//wwwlinkedincom/in/ravib .
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Try setting it to just ravib instead of the full URL.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I aready tried that. That causes the generated url to be https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=ravib which is invalid. The correct url is https://www.linkedin.com/in/ravib .
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
LinkedIn changed the format from https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=164916608 to https://www.linkedin.com/in/kornfeldpetereliyahu
If you have your old number somewhere it will still work as LinkedIn will do the redirecting...but for the new form Chris should do some update on CodeProject's side...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please try now?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
A-OK. Thanks, CM!
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
It seems, that in the past few weeks/months we had few incidents where articles were approved which were of low quality or plain wrong.
Can you look at who is approving things, please. - Article Writing Discussion Boards - CodeProject[^]
Another thread- The Lounge - CodeProject[^]
I looked who have the privilege to approve and disapprove and it seems anybody who has Gold status on following Author, Authority, Debator, Organiser can do it.
I feel that Gold status with Organiser as a stand alone criteria is not good, because any member can achieve this status in max 2 weeks by reporting a spam member/post and this creates a high probability of "new" moderator to approve Low quality articles.
So I would suggest the privilege should be Gold (Organizer) + Silver ( Author/Authority /Debator) or any other Secondary criteria.
Based on the number of spam we get, anyone can actually report 25 members each day for 2 weeks and get Gold status as an organizer and start approving the article.
Just my 2 cents.
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
Authority is even easier to get as organizer.
I am not critizicing your idea. I like it an I agree. The problem is... how to do it correctly?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I have said in my post
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately our system doesn't allow us to say "Gold X and Silver Y". It works on ORs only. Having said that, an organiser is specifically the member type that should be able to approve / disapprove, and we should be able to have an organiser who isn't also an author or question-answerer.
I think the solution here is one of education.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
How about reducing the points to 2 or 1 for reporting the spam?
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
Good idea!
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Add this [^] to list.!
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
Reported and closed.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have tried to upload the profile image for code project profile, but it is not able to upload. It is showing following page.
https://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/Modify.aspx
with following error on page.
Something bad happened
We're not sure what, but we have a few guesses.
Problem: Illegal characters in path.
Ticket: 0
Server: Web01
Please suggest what can i do to upload my profile image.
Regards,
Mukesh
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is not any delete link for deleting the gravatar and save it. Please let me know the steps how to do that.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Check "remove my picture" and save.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I have done it, thanks
|
|
|
|
|
I no longer see the queue.
I distinctly remember that I used to see this queue on the front-page (I even helped out from time to time).
Did something change? Or was the fact that I saw the queue the bug?
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
The queue is actually empty. So it will not be shown on the main page. Wait a while and you might see it again.
But there seem to be some members around at the moment that approve everything as soon as something new pops up.
|
|
|
|
|
Jochen Arndt wrote: The queue is actually empty. So it will not be shown on the main page. Wait a while and you might see it again.
Could be but it's been like that for a few days now.
I'll keep an eye on it for the time being, see if it returns or not.
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
9 items in the queue at the moment...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|