|
When pasting CP QA links, the title is not inserted anymore.
Example: [^].
It seems that only QA links are affected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cofirmed:
- Pasting a link to a QA question produces:
<a href="http://www.codeproject.com/Questions/1143578/Regular-expressions-to-match-month-and-year"></a>[<a href="http://www.codeproject.com/Questions/1143578/Regular-expressions-to-match-month-and-year" target="_blank" title="New Window">^</a>] - Pasting a link to a forum message produces:
<a href="http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5315655/Link-title-not-inserted-when-pasting-CP-QA-links.aspx">Bugs and Suggestions</a>[<a href="http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5315655/Link-title-not-inserted-when-pasting-CP-QA-links.aspx" target="_blank" title="New Window">^</a>]
Firefox 49.0.1; Windows 10 v1607.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Strange. It used to be like that for me, but recently (this week?) has gone back to posting the web page's title rather than the URL. In fact the link posted by Jochen shows that the pastings are now working. What do you see in that QA?
|
|
|
|
|
Most links are working. It just seems to be links to QA questions where the title doesn't get inserted.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Still cannot see an example in the link Jochen pointed to.
|
|
|
|
|
The example isn't in the link he pointed to - it IS the link. 
Copy a link to a message, or a page on an external site, and paste it into a message. The page title is usually inserted as the link text. (If not, the URL is inserted as the link text.)
Copy a link to any QA question and paste it into a message. The link text is not inserted.
That's the bug.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. Oh, and sorry for being even dimmer than usual.
|
|
|
|
|
No need to apologise. It took me a while to work out what he meant too. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
This question [^] was in the "1 QA needs attention" List as it would have been spam. I have let it through because it has no spam (bad question of course, but no spam). What I don't understand... the question (now in v2 by me), the comments and the answers are from 2015... how did it land in the spam filter?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it got sent there as the OP tried to update it.
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't my "approval" be v3 instead of v2?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Click the v2 to get the revisions and you'll see that Richard is quite right.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: 3 No 20-Oct-16 2:20 Pending Member 11970769
Updates in content. Changes: 70
2 - publicly available Yes 20-Sep-15 9:51 Available 0x01AA
1 No 19-Sep-15 6:27 Closed Member 11970769
It shows pending although I let it through. In the question itself I appear as editor and the v2 as index.
Am I really so affected by blank nights (recent father) that I am missing everything? I start to think on not posting anything else for a while 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Your quote came out right this time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your update is v4 (klick the "show minor revisions" button)
Why it says v2 instead of v4 in the question is beyond me though.
Congrats by the way! 
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: (klick the "show minor revisions" button)
Ok... I do need another coffee
Jörgen Andersson wrote: Why it says v2 instead of v4 in the question is beyond me though.
That is what confused me and why the "publicy available" stuck in v2, instead of coming to mine.
Jörgen Andersson wrote: Congrats by the way!
Thanks a lot 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It would be better to have a small button to mark the notification as read directly from hover popup on red notification indicator.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH A#@RFJ\c^JPL>;"[, /|+&WLEZGc
AFXc!L<br />
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_ADEPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[MUKs$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Explaining a minor improvement in an article I found something a bit weird, not sure if it is designed to do that but...
writing
<blockquote class="quote"><div class="op">Quote:</div>Following are the commands to install dotnet from the article in the link above for Ubuntu 16.04:
sudo sh -c 'echo "deb [arch=amd64] https://apt-mo.trafficmanager.net/repos/dotnet-release/ xenial main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/dotnetdev.list'
</blockquote>
gives:
Quote: Following are the commands to install dotnet from the article in the link above for Ubuntu 16.04:
sudo sh -c 'echo "deb [arch=amd64] https://apt-mo.trafficmanager.net/repos/dotnet-release/ xenial main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/dotnetdev.list'
But writing:
<blockquote class="quote"><div class="op">Quote:</div>Following are the commands to install dotnet from the article in the link above for Ubuntu 16.04:
<pre>
sudo sh -c 'echo "deb [arch=amd64] https://apt-mo.trafficmanager.net/repos/dotnet-release/ xenial main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/dotnetdev.list'</blockquote></pre>
gives:
Quote: Following are the commands to install dotnet from the article in the link above for Ubuntu 16.04:
sudo sh -c 'echo "deb [arch=amd64] https://apt-mo.trafficmanager.net/repos/dotnet-release/ xenial main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/dotnetdev.list'</blockquote>
which messes with the format of the rest of the message.
By the way... I didn't add the < pre > < /pre > tags of the second "writing" withing the quote (i see them in the preview but not in my own message input box)
This is the paste with encoded HTML for that bit of text:
<pre lang="text"><blockquote class="quote"><div class="op">Quote:</div>Following are the commands to install dotnet from the article in the link above for Ubuntu 16.04:
sudo sh -c 'echo "deb [arch=amd64] https://apt-mo.trafficmanager.net/repos/dotnet-release/ xenial main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/dotnetdev.list'</blockquote></pre>
Note the missing opening "pre" before the command. That comes alone when indenting the line a bit with empty spaces.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I have used the same clipboard for the 4 first pastes, only used encode-html option and additionally the code widget with language text or the paste as is option
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
In case 2 you closed the tags out of order, having: <blockquote>...<pre>...</blockquote>...</pre>
instead of
<blockquote>...<pre>...</pre></blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
You don't get it... I didn't do anything
It comes automatically
Copy the content of the first snippet and do it yourself, one time as it is the second one just delete the carriage return before </blockquote>
You are protector, just click "edit" my message and see the content carefully. I didn't write the "pre's" I just selected the "snippet" and used the widget to give "language text" but the two "pre's" envolving the bash command are not in my message, they appear on their own
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 19-Oct-16 12:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Still not sure what you did. Iposted all the 'raw' text, and accepted as Quoted block. Then selected the bash script and select code - text, and got the result below, which is correct.
Quote: Following are the commands to install dotnet from the article in the link above for Ubuntu 16.04:
sudo sh -c 'echo "deb [arch=amd64] https://apt-mo.trafficmanager.net/repos/dotnet-release/ xenial main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/dotnetdev.list'
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
