|
It is something I asked for too in an other discussion with Sean...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
It appears that mathematical expressions formatted using MathJax are not being displayed properly. Instead, they are being displayed as written.
For the following in an article, I should see a nice r = A + B in italics:
$\begin{aligned} r = A + B \theta \end{aligned}$
Instead I see exactly the line above.
Having CodeProject support MathJax was discussed in the Article FAQ discussion forum, in a posting entitled "What is he preferred way to format mathematical expressions?" posted 17-Dec-13.
I use MathJax in my article "The Spiral TrackBar Control" and just noticed that the nice mathematical formatting was all gone.
Thanks,
Graham
|
|
|
|
|
Mathjax was only included for articles and Quick Answers.
I'll add support to the discussion boards.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
Thanks for the prompt reply - but I was referring to an article "The Spiral TrackBar Control". I viewed the article in both IE (version 11) and Firefox (version 50), and in both there was no formatting.
I'm not sure if it is site issue, or an issue with the browsers on my PC.
But anyways, having it enabled in the discussion forums would be great!
Thanks
Graham
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
You're trying to load the Mathjax script from an HTTP URL. That won't work on an HTTPS site.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Yep - all fixed.
You know that bit of code that should absolutely, positively, can't help it but work? Yeah - the exact code that fails in production. Even though It Worked On My Machine.
Yeah - I had one of those moments.
All...fixed. Possibly.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hello there,
[Related Article]
I have already rated above article but when I reload that page it again shows blank star on top right corner.
BTW, It does not allow to rate that article again but I think it should show my ratings in top right corner rather than blank star.
modified 17-Dec-16 0:43am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member 11916694 wrote: BTW, It does not allow to rate that article again
Yes it does. You can change your rating for an article at any time.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
We have "show me what I voted" on our TODO.
(It's a tradeoff of performance vs convenience)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to use ™ in a Q&A answer to get the superscripted TM symbol, and while the preview shows it correctly, the resulting answer shows some weird characters. Interestingly, it shows up fine in the forums.
™
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming it's this answer[^], the ™ shows up fine for me. (Firefox 50.0.2 | Windows 10)
However, the source shows the character, not the HTML entity. Maybe there's an encoding issue on the page?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I'm using IE 11 right now. I can only tell you what I see.
This is one of the reasons I absolutely hate web dev...
The answer to most problems boils down to how you're holding your head, and whether or not there's a freakin unicorn in the vicinity (and what color it it)...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
In IE11 on my machine it's working fine
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A week's work and I now know more about HTML parsing than I wanted to. Even though 2 months back I thought I knew all I would ever need or want to know.
Long story short: The HTML specs say empty (or moolean) attributes like "nowrap" in <TD nowrap> can have ="" appended to them. Some read the specs to say "they must" have ="" appended. To me it seems either is OK, both are valid.
Our HTML sanitiser uses AngleSharp which errs on the side of perfect formatting. I love it. However, it means that if the input HTML isn't perfect then it gets a little weird. So the solution has been to ensure that AngleSharp only sees well-formed (or at least, not-obviously-broken) HTML, so I wrote a quick and dirty pre-processor to get things sorted before they went to AngleSharp and it's all better.
Hopefully.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, constantly. Just like the rest of the industry...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: empty (or moolean) attributes
The cows are taking over!
Boolean attributes can also have the same value as the attribute name:
If the attribute is present, its value must either be the empty string or a value that is an ASCII case-insensitive match for the attribute's canonical name, with no leading or trailing whitespace.
So <td nowrap> , <td nowrap=""> and <td nowrap="nowrap"> all mean the same thing.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|