|
ARGH.
This is why developers re-invent the wheel. Everytime they use someone else's wheel they have a bumpy ride.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Gee, what could possibly go wrong with other peoples wheels...
Multi-angle-wheel bicycle appears in Qingdao -- china.org.cn[^]
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
A user has posted a message to the Lounge which got wrongly caught in the moderation queue. I suspect he tried to post the message again, it showed up twice. I let both messages pass, and deleted one of them manually. But now both posts are gone.
Below is the link to one of the messages which I tried to reply noticing the member that he shouldn't repeat posting if the message doesn't show up instantly.
New Discussion[^]
Hope you can find something from the bare bits of info I'm able to provide.
Could also be that another protector has noticed the double posting and removed the other post.
Edit: Now it shows up as deleted (it's the one I deleted manually, the one I wanted to remain there is nowhere to be seen): The Lounge[^]
@cp-andy : Did you delete your other message?
|
|
|
|
|
No I haven't deleted. I think if it's caught in moderation queue then proper message should be displayed instead of 'Message removed'
I will post again.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
There's a request in for this already[^].
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
The funny thing about it is that it showed message removed after it was accepted, and then re-appeared in the moderation queue. And that was before you re-posted it.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah. Caching problem between servers?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
But why would it say "message removed"?
If it was a caching issue, it's either there or not, but "message removed" sounds like Schrödinger's message to me.
|
|
|
|
|
"Message removed" is a placeholder for any message which is in moderation. Once it's let through, it changes to the actual subject line.
See here: Bugs and Suggestions[^]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, got it. Then it's showing up and magical reappearing in the queue again could've been a caching issue.
|
|
|
|
|
There is a major bug in the system. I am unable to post a message in lounge section. After submit, 'Message removed' text is shown.
Can you fix this asap please.
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
Andy, please see my post above. I reported the case here[^]
I've explained there what could've happened from my POV.
|
|
|
|
|
Your 3rd message was caught in the spam filter as well - I've let it through and it is now available to the public.
|
|
|
|
|
Every now and then a new article is submitted to a contest that has finished a long time ago. Shouldn't this be prevented? Updates of course should be allowed but why allow completely new articles?
For example Azure Environment Config. using ARM and PowerShell
|
|
|
|
|
Good catch. The way is now shut.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
I have the setting unchecked, but I am seeing popups.
|
|
|
|
|
Woops. We need to remove that setting.
It's on by default from now on.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Grrr...
|
|
|
|
|
Adding insult to injury, my normal solution for dealing with unwanted crap on a webpage (like cancerous popovers) won't easily work to kill it.
The fact that the stupid popup is above the user name but goes away the moment you mouse off the name means I can't select it (by mousing over) to create a rule for my AdWebsiteMisfeature Blocker.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
OK, fair enough.
However.
The popups won't appear until you hover over an author's name for a second. I've tried to make it polite.
The reason I want the popups is because I want to make it, by default, easy for everyone to see who they are talking to. I get that it could be annoying if you hover your mouse over a name on the right hand side of a forum. However, I want to make it simple for those interacting in the forums to "see" who they are talking to. Anonymity or treating others in a forum like they aren't actually real people is the bane of the online experience.
I'm open to suggestions.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
But I don't care. Others are welcome to the feature, I want it off for me. That used to be the case.
|
|
|
|
|
You can now turn it off
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
What was wrong with the old on by default but we can turn it off if we don't want it.
Please don't make me have to start up browser debugging rules to figure out how to identify the offending div to make an adblock rule the hard way.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: What was wrong with the old on by default but we can turn it off if we don't want it.
I don't want another Microsoft Word where there are a million options and no one knows what they do.
Regardless, I'll schedule for the checkbox to be added back. However, I am curious as to how it's actually triggered given the pause-wait that's needed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|