|
Not sure if the preview's yours or built in, but it ain't working consistently for me. It freezes every other time almost.
"I know which side I want to win regardless of how many wrongs they have to commit to achieve it." - Stan Shannon
Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
|
|
|
|
|
Should be working now. Well, maybe. Assuming it was my problem, that is...
But who is the king of all of these folks?
|
|
|
|
|
...presumably it isn't "sticky" though, and that's why we can reply. I suppose we shouldn't filter out Admin threads with replies...
But who is the king of all of these folks?
|
|
|
|
|
Shog9 wrote: I suppose we shouldn't filter out Admin threads with replies
Why not? Admin messages always come from Chris...
|
|
|
|
|
...should now work.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, goody...
FWIW, i'm impressed by how well email notifications have been working for direct replies. I use GMail IMAP, and usually get notified of a new reply within seconds of it being posted. Pretty slick...
But who is the king of all of these folks?
|
|
|
|
|
Speaking of gmail and IMAP.. does the IMAP setup work better than POP? My girlfriend's POP-setup is behaving weird, as old messages aren't removed from the gmail server as instructed. Might be a bug in Thundbird - I haven't bothered to check it out yet.
--
Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
|
|
|
|
|
POP works well enough, but you need to pay attention to how you have it configured in GMail - there are (if i recall) three different options for what to do with messages once they've been downloaded.
IMAP adds a lot - first off, you can delete messages locally and they get deleted on the server. You can manage folders, read/unread states, and use multiple clients without confusing everything. Also, it's faster (usually).
But who is the king of all of these folks?
|
|
|
|
|
I've been using Gmail's IMAP feature and I like it a lot better than the POP service they offer. Much snappier.
|
|
|
|
|
So I implemented a nice little "Show the CPhog users" feature. As with all the rest of my features, there's no functionality to turn it off and I don't care if you dislike it.
|
|
|
|
|
Ha! Nice.
I've been using a little bookmarklet to highlight CPhog posts... the little greaseBob is much better.
|
|
|
|
|
How can we see that?
"I know which side I want to win regardless of how many wrongs they have to commit to achieve it." - Stan Shannon
Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
|
|
|
|
|
|
D'oh. I thought that that was a new icon for some people. Didn't move the mouse over it to see.
Very nice.
"I know which side I want to win regardless of how many wrongs they have to commit to achieve it." - Stan Shannon
Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: Very nice.
Yeah...it's pretty slick isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Dunn, second thread from bottom, has two posts in a row with and without the icon.
"I know which side I want to win regardless of how many wrongs they have to commit to achieve it." - Stan Shannon
Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
|
|
|
|
|
On occasion, while we're doing development, we cause things to break for some people. I'm sure Mike had a good reason for not using CPhog to post that particular post.
|
|
|
|
|
Ahhh, I thought it detects CPhog Users not CPhog Posts. Therefore, the tooltip is incorrect.
There are II kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who understand Roman numerals. Web - Blog - RSS - Math
|
|
|
|
|
Does this give all CPhog users or only CPhog trunk users? Should you now differentiate between trunks and non-trunks?
"I know which side I want to win regardless of how many wrongs they have to commit to achieve it." - Stan Shannon
Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: Does this give all CPhog users or only CPhog trunk users?
Only trunk users see it for right now. But everybody who uses any version of CPhog will show up with the icon next to their name. And no...I'm not going to differentiate between trunk and non-trunk.
|
|
|
|
|
Gonna toss this out the door later today if no-one objects, just to get something out.
Pretty much the same as 1.9, except for the changes needed to support CodeProject 2. There are a few speed tweaks (using jQuery during load-time to search through nearly every element in the document is best avoided) and a few minor style changes, but for the most part this should look and act roughly the same.
Known migration issues:
- Signature capture not working properly.
- Misc. stability issues (not sure whether these are CPhog, CP, or both).
Oh, and please reply if you're notified of this - the forum was just reborn, let's make sure it's fully alive...
Userscript location:
http://svn.gixug.com/cphog/trunk/cphog.user.js [^]
|
|
|
|
|
So why didn't you change this to CPhog 2.0?
"I know which side I want to win regardless of how many wrongs they have to commit to achieve it." - Stan Shannon
Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
|
|
|
|
|
Fear of the dreaded "second-system syndrome"!
---- ...the wind blows over it and it is gone, and its place remembers it no more...
|
|
|
|
|
If you scroll down, you'll notice that there's a little link at the bottom of the rest of the content in the nav bar that says "Swap Sides!"
Go ahead and flip it back to the left if you like it that way and it should remember your pref for the rest of eternity. If it works pretty well for you guys, then we can release this small update for the users...and they have Have It Their Way.
|
|
|
|
|
I think that's what you guys call it. Clicking on a poster's name in a forum doesn't show that person's profile now.
|
|
|
|