15,891,253 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View Python questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by Prafulla Hunde (Top 3 by date)
Prafulla Hunde
3-Jun-15 14:26pm
View
Reason for my vote of 5 \n Great !
Prafulla Hunde
25-Mar-11 17:11pm
View
I agree that the public interface has to be tested. But if one public method depends on n numbers of private methods to accomplish the task , then skipping them is also not a good idea.The one of the advantage of unit tests is to quickly figure out the failure when code is updated. If public method fails by updating any of private method it will take more time to figure out which one is causing problem. But if private methods are also have tests for them the fix may be quicker.
Prafulla Hunde
25-Mar-11 17:00pm
View
Readability may not be so bad if the partial class definition is in separate file.Something like what visual studio does by making Form.Designer.cs to put all auto generated code. Also a separate inner test class can be used to put all testing code.
And all the code in the separate partial class file is compiled conditionally so it does not exist in release dlls.