Comments by skv_lviv - CodeProject

skv_lviv 17-Oct-12 9:07am View

unfortunately, no.
Since I needed to get number from 1 to 10 I've replaced number picker with styled radio group. Of course it works, but it doesn't looks like standard control and user has to make additional click, so it isn't nice solution and it isn't what I wanted.
It looks that the only option is to write custom control...

skv_lviv 22-Jun-12 6:44am View

Well, thanks, however I saw that article and currently I'm interested in having something like that for 2.3.3 (or for 2.3.3 and below) and standard look for above versions.
Maybe something between that one and the one in 4.0.3 will be developed in the future, but currently I just want to make standard control look in a way it is supposed to be. Do you know whether this is possible?

skv_lviv 17-Jul-11 22:08pm View

Thanks.
However I don't see those replies, it looks like they are not available anymore. Will have to wait until there will be update in the original question or some new comment.

skv_lviv 16-Jul-11 2:59am View

Cool!!! :)

skv_lviv 16-Jul-11 2:25am View

You're welcome

skv_lviv 15-Jul-11 7:45am View

Imagine another situation - you have lost connection for 1 hour, and something important arrived during this period?
So probably you should at least have not 5 minutes, but since the last time you successfully connected, or something like this

skv_lviv 15-Jul-11 7:01am View

Have you tried to go to original post (which is stated at the start of that article) and download sources from it (http://blogs.msdn.com/cfs-file.ashx/__key/communityserver-components-postattachments/00-10-11-98-72/DatePickerTemp.zip)?

skv_lviv 15-Jul-11 6:11am View

Generally, I agree with what Dave Kreskowiak wrote. And, yes, this isn't accurate number, and it shouldn't be treated like something accurate, even MSDN says "Retrieves the number of bytes currently THOUGHT to be allocated". However who said that this number cannot be used as some indicator? If this number grows significantly when it is not supposed to do, this means that you have memory leak without using other more accurate methods. When this number is stable, you may expect that your application works fine and may try to use other methods to additionally verify this.

skv_lviv 15-Jul-11 5:24am View

Well, it is your right to put any mark you wish (even if I don't agree with it :) )
However, your assumption that I failed to see compilation problems, isn't correct. I just didn't think that this is important thing to mention here and just a simple misprint while entering simplified code and may be ignored like some irrelevant to the question.

Yes, was wrong regarding static methods.

skv_lviv 15-Jul-11 0:44am View

You're welcome

skv_lviv 15-Jul-11 0:23am View

You have different types for IndexId column, which isn't quite good. The best thing is to change type of dtUploadedIDs.IndexID to int in the database.
However if this isn't possible, then you have two choices.

1) convert ids from allUploaded to int, this will look like
var allUploaded = dtUploadedIDs.Select().Select( p => Convert.ToInt32( p[ 0 ] ) );

or

2) You may convert dtTable.IndexID to string:
var ToUpload = dtTable.Select().Where( o => !allUploaded.Contains( o[ 0 ].ToString() );

skv_lviv 17-Jun-11 0:51am View

Response.Write is not necessary for substring :)

Comments by skv_lviv (Top 12 by date)