15,996,613 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View .NET questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by CalicoSkies (Top 6 by date)
CalicoSkies
17-Dec-20 15:54pm
View
The map library uses screen tiles that are 256x256 in size, but the actual image files we want to display will be about 25 megapixels. We were planning to slice our images into smaller pieces for more efficient zooming (i.e., not loading all the pieces at the same time, ideally).
256x256 wasn't a size chosen by us - It just happens that the map library we're using uses screen tiles that are that size.
I've looked into DeepZoom. It seems the original DeepZoom was written for Silverlight, which is no longer supported. I've seen the article on the modern DeepZoom that you point to, and it's written in JavaScript - I'm not sure how easily that would be integrated into a C#/WPF project.
CalicoSkies
16-Dec-20 11:58am
View
Of course efficiency is a concern.. We will probably be working with individual image tiles that are about 25 megapixels each, so we wouldn't want them all loaded into memory at the same time. And something that costs money might not be a deal breaker. Also as far as overly complicated, what I was saying was it seems like using a map viewer is more complicated than necessary when I just want to use a set of local image tiles. I don't really need map stuff like latitude & longitude navigation, map markers, etc..
CalicoSkies
20-Oct-20 15:39pm
View
The way this is implemented currently seems a little convoluted. For instance, th ePinnedObject class has some stuff in it that I wouldn't think would be totally necessary. I was hoping for something more straightforward.
Also, as developers, don't we always strive to find the 'best' solution? Not just something that "works" and leave it at that? ;)
CalicoSkies
1-Nov-11 19:53pm
View
Thanks. I downloaded the code from that page, but it has compile & link issues.. I got it to compile by adding a type declaration to a loop variable, but now it has a linker error - It gives an "unresolved external symbol" error for CFileVersionInfo::vftable. How were you able to get this to compile & link?
CalicoSkies
1-Nov-11 19:44pm
View
1. I'm not sure what you mean by "image".
2. I want to get the version of the application from its own resources.. What filename would I pass to this function?
CalicoSkies
1-Nov-11 19:43pm
View
Deleted
Thanks. I downloaded the code from that page, but it doesn't compile (using Visual Studio 2010). :(
Show More