15,612,595 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View Python questions
View Javascript questions
View C++ questions
View Java questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by dandy72 (Top 6 by date)
dandy72
13-Dec-20 13:02pm
View
Yeah, things only start behaving differently after the 17th time, duh!
dandy72
26-Feb-18 12:31pm
View
Thanks. I *had* been looking for that, but when there's a single response, it's not obvious the button is a follow-up for *that*. It's more obvious once there's more than one solution posted, and there's one such button for each.
dandy72
3-Jul-17 8:09am
View
Nah, it's all good. As I wrote, it turns out all I needed was a trivial example to get the ball rolling, and yours did exactly that.
As it stands, the code is now written and looks *great* (at least I think so) - but what I still need to test is what happens when working with negative coordinates, which I know needs to be considered. Right now something would probably crash, or at least render, very badly.
dandy72
1-Jul-17 13:17pm
View
Just found a bit of time to try it out...
While I recognize the humor, this has been more helpful than you'd probably think. It's still
exactly
what I needed to get started.
dandy72
26-Jun-17 12:32pm
View
That should go a long way to get me started, thanks for that. I read the Petzold books decades ago and remember the chapters on this sort of thing, and it turns out custom drawing with the GDI primitives is something I was fortunate enough (?) to avoid for this long. I just need to sit down one evening and figure out the math. That's what I was trying to avoid--maybe, just maybe, someone's already done this and published what probably amounts to one function. It can't be hard, you just have to work through it once. It's not a homework :-) it's just not a priority enough for me to try from scratch without asking first.
I appreciate the response, it'll definitely be useful. Once I find the time to work it out, I'll be happy to share the results here.
dandy72
25-Jan-12 18:17pm
View
Deleted
Where's yours?
Show More