Comments by RuthWa - CodeProject

RuthWa 7-Mar-24 5:35am View

Okay. Thank you for the clarification an for the answer.

RuthWa 7-Mar-24 2:24am View

I understand the "services.RegisterSingleton<IDog, Dog>();" line. But on the other side it is not clear for me what the line "services.RegisterSingleton<Dog>();" is supposed to do. Why can't we just use Dog class without registering it?

RuthWa 6-Mar-24 14:47pm View

I know that files must be structured according to content logic. I'm talking about the case where further grouping is not possible. And even in that case, I still feel bad when I see different or even chaotic order of files.

But anyway, thanks for the answer. I appreciate it.

RuthWa 6-Mar-24 14:37pm View

I thought it is necessary to use interfaces for "Tight Coupling between classes" avoiding. Especially since I encountered many articles which state how decoupling is vital.

At least, I can see now the approach "ICat -> Cat; IDog -> Dog" is disputed. As an inexperienced beginner before, I asked myself, why do I really need the Interfaces here. Now I came to the same point.

RuthWa 12-Feb-24 18:50pm View

Perhaps I nitpicked to those rules a little bit and overrated their importance as extremely vital. Thanks. I'll reconsider my approach to using rules.

RuthWa 12-Feb-24 18:12pm View

Okay. I made this code myself. The thing is, I find default implementations very useful. So I don't understand why lots of people hate this feature, especially if there are no alternatives to add some additional functionalities to any class, even if it is derived from another one. Actually, those alternatives exist, but no one that doesn't break rules such as DRY principle or CA1040 which says "Avoid empty interfaces".

"So the empty interface with an extension method would be the likely solution." - Maybe, but it is a violation of CA1040 rule.

Anyway, thanks for the answer.

RuthWa 6-Oct-22 20:10pm View

Thanks a lot. I didn't know that unlike multiple classes I really can use multiple interfaces as constraint.

RuthWa 6-Oct-22 4:27am View

The thing is i don't like the fact the negation consists in a single thin stick with a dot (i.e. one character named 'exclamation mark'). For me it is difficult to notice, especially when it stands right before 'I' character which has similar form. So it doesn't matter in what direction to read either right to left or left to right or whatever. This way doesn't help me with both code reading and code looking.

RuthWa 5-Oct-21 7:11am View

That's incredible. Thanks a lot!

RuthWa 4-Oct-21 22:02pm View

Cool, I've never seen that before. But is it right? Can you shortly explain what is it? Does it allowed to use such thing not only for nullable boolean, but both "bool" and "bool?" ?

It is probably the best answer.

RuthWa 4-Oct-21 21:31pm View

Maybe it is acceptable, but
https://rules.sonarsource.com/csharp/RSPEC-1125

So yes, the second option would be appreciated.

RuthWa 4-Oct-21 21:28pm View

I agree, it does (at least for me). But most of people will not, because https://rules.sonarsource.com/csharp/RSPEC-1125.

RuthWa 12-Jan-20 20:48pm View

Interesting solution. It will help. Thank you for answer!

Comments by RuthWa (Top 13 by date)