Click here to Skip to main content
15,905,915 members

Comments by lily96 (Top 4 by date)

lily96 6-Apr-18 11:33am View    
I didn't analysis the results after i asked before for the same issue . I see that the wrong in the source code not time after i read your comment , and because i didn't write the codes by my self i found it difficult for me as a student to read and understand the codes of the algorithm as it is new for me that why i asked for reading the codes.

Thank you for your time and attention, you gave me ideas to search for,and i will update my question.

lily96 5-Apr-18 4:03am View    
I have tried in revers it gives me a good result it decrease,but i can not accept it because i think the source code does not accept the key in length 256-bit as if i rerun the system for each key the result will be in order for(128,192,256) is (51 ms ,39 ms ,50 ms )! .. could you please check the coeds whether encrypts text with key 256-bit or not? .. I hope you understand what i meant
lily96 4-Apr-18 6:37am View    
i have updated my question by posting the method I'm trying to call
lily96 29-Mar-18 13:44pm View    
Thank you sir!.. it works :))))))