Comments by Nightpoison

Nightpoison 28-May-20 8:05am View

Ok, that makes sense. I've updated my code and I'm now seeing the correct characters when I use '1', '2', etc. Now that I see that I'm able to pull out the original data, 0xBF, etc and display that using %x. I'm set. Thank you for your insight and help.

Nightpoison 27-May-20 13:43pm View

@karsenk

Hey, thanks for the tip. while this fixed the looping issue, I'm still not getting anything readable on the C side. I changed up the python script to do everything outside of sendall, but what I receive on the other end it garbled up.

Nightpoison 19-Nov-19 8:40am View

Richard, thank you for that clarification. That makes sense to me.

Nightpoison 12-Nov-19 8:12am View

from my understand lamdas are that efficient of a tool. While I never mentioned efficiency as a prereq, I should have. But you did answer my question.

I personally haven't spent much time looking at lambda functions.

Nightpoison 12-Nov-19 7:52am View

Hi, Thanks for the quick post. I appreciate Question,isn't this more or less the same thing as my for loop. I"m not 100% on python and what occurs in the background. but with the exception of calling the sum function, this still contains a for loop. Is it anymore efficient?

Nightpoison 17-Oct-19 13:48pm View

OriginalGriff haha you beat me to it. I just updated my original post and said the same thing, I think...more or less.

Nightpoison 17-Oct-19 13:34pm View

CPallini I think I just figured it out. Its a pointer issue. The index's of my images array each have a unique address. I just printed them out. However, when I print the first address of the next level images[i][0] all addresses are the same.

Nightpoison 17-Oct-19 13:30pm View

@CPallini yea sorry about that. I just changed it to C. habbit. I didn't want to load all the code as there is a lot more. verify_bmp can be ignored in regards to testing. The code in its original format works just fine, meaning if I want to open an image process it then open the next image and process it works great. I'm attempting to open all images first, then process each one in sequence.

Comments by Nightpoison (Top 8 by date)