15,891,905 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View Python questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by SubbZer (Top 11 by date)
SubbZer
19-Jul-19 5:26am
View
Yes it is. But we dont want to change anything. We want to tell our customers how they can protect there users. And if the bad guy logs in and do some critical stuff its ok, as long as we can secure that not the correct user form this company did this..
We currently try do develop an custom login form, copying the very first login request for a new user and always send this request to the server.. so from now on the users have to login 1 time with the real login form to get the encrypted password and from this point on they have to login with our form and with the enrypted password in the password field.
I think with this way we can ensure always the same userid in the html request and we can deny any from other pcs.
SubbZer
19-Jul-19 5:26am
View
Deleted
Yes it is. But we dont want to change anything. We want to tell our customers how they can protect there users. And if the bad guy logs in and do some critical stuff its ok, as long as we can secure that not the correct user form this company did this..
We currently try do develop an custom login form, copying the very first login request for a new user and always send this request to the server.. so from now on the users have to login 1 time with the real login form to get the encrypted password and from this point on they have to login with our form and with the enrypted password in the password field.
I think with this way we can ensure always the same userid in the html request and we can deny any from other pcs.
SubbZer
19-Jul-19 5:07am
View
ok thanks, i understand. But if we ask the user to login 10 times, we have 10 different types of password data and all of them are usable anytime.
Maybe i am wrong but if i use the same enrypting everytime i must always have the same result?
I dont understand how the server can know about all of these datastrings without any token or constant enrypting method.
My problem is that i have to help our customers, if there would be the same datastring anytime i could filter the requests from other pc then the owner ones. But if the owner always generates a new one and none of these will expire it gets hard for me to help..
Software owner is contacted but will need for sure few weeks..
SubbZer
8-Apr-15 8:21am
View
I found a project on myCSharp.de which also contains the source code.
The program reads the html/tcp traffic on your networkcard using WinPcap.
Link: http://www.mycsharp.de/wbb2/thread.php?threadid=74918&hilight=httpsaver
Note: The program doesnt work on my PC but it contains the html translation and the capture events which should work.
I have done some troubleshooting and i found some tcp packets which always contains a null reference.
This ones are outgoing packets, so i asked myself, does WinPcap get the outgoing packages before they get payloaded in tcp format or somthing else?
The incomming http packages are certainly in tcp format, but which format has the outgoing packet?
SubbZer
23-Feb-15 5:25am
View
Thank you, this will help me a lot! I have never read a styling guide before, just learning by doing and asking.
SubbZer
22-Feb-15 16:08pm
View
It affect all child controls, i only want to make the header-text bold, not the buttontext (listboxitem,label..) in this tab.
SubbZer
22-Feb-15 13:37pm
View
Ok, i give you some code, all child elements are effected by FontWeight="Bold".
Now i hope you also can help me.
SubbZer
22-Feb-15 8:57am
View
Deleted
I right-clicked the standard TabControl and edited the actual pattern instead of an copy, dont ask my why, first steps with blend.
SubbZer
22-Feb-15 8:53am
View
Thats the clue, i doesnt change any code.
I worked with Blend, just for creating my own TabControl.
There have to be a clickable option/resource where i can "easily" change the standard value.. any idea?
*I right-clicked the standard TabControl and edited the actual pattern instead of an copy, dont ask my why, first steps with blend.
**OK, i'm sure that i must had changed any code, so the correct question maybe is: where can i change an attribute that affect ALL controls?
SubbZer
22-Jul-13 16:12pm
View
Thanks! This was the answer what i was searching for.
I think this would work. Thank you
SubbZer
22-Jul-13 14:59pm
View
1st: fexibility sounds good!
2nd: thats exactly what i want - "the user should be able to select multiple functions and have them inserted at the current cursor position"
thats what my private void Calc_PreviewKeyDown(object sender, KeyEventArgs)-event does, the user can choose the function and the code insered them at the current position
however, it makes the program much slower.. (many declarations of keys what should'nt be pressed..)
ONE of the next problems is that i also can write normal text in the textbox wich also should be observed because the text can contain the shortcut names, then it should'nt be selectable
Show More