15,912,504 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View Python questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by hammerstein05 (Top 5 by date)
hammerstein05
19-Aug-10 8:35am
View
Deleted
Reason for my vote of 5
Excellent!
hammerstein05
6-Jul-10 17:36pm
View
Reason for my vote of 5
This is what a question should look like!
hammerstein05
30-Jun-10 11:14am
View
Agreed. I was trying to do the "pointing the poster in the right direction" thing rather than hand holding all the way through.
hammerstein05
24-Jun-10 16:40pm
View
You think the OP is asking if you can make the drop down list show when focused? Rather than populate when focused?
hammerstein05
22-Jun-10 15:44pm
View
"Then you end up doing a global search for the inherited class. This annoys me."
I agree that it's frustrating, but loose coupling means you don't really bind it to a solid implementation until you need, right? It would be helpful if "Go To Definition" popped up a list of classes that implement this interface.