|
The article is gone: and so is your account.
As I said: we do not appreciate plagiarism. The rule is simple: you steal, your account is forfeit. The accounts of plagiarists are not reactivated. You have been here more than long enough to know and understand this.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
How can I tell you that its not a copy man. Just look at the content and references, they more than enough. And if its a copy instead of banning account you guys should help author to make it correct or to provide references link. Or you should just close article permanently not the account. And if you have banned the account please close my old article related to kafka also as it is still available. Because i need a place where moderators will help not blame. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
We tried that.
We warned people.
We let them come back when they said "I'm sorry, I didn't know, I won't do it again".
And guess what?
They did it again. And generally, they just tried to be "cleverer" and hide it. But we're pretty damn good at spotting plagiarism now - we've had a lot of practice - and there isn't a lot that gets past us. And what does, is generally spotted even after publication.
So the rules changed: no second chances. You knew what you were doing: we know what you did. Your account is gone.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please tell me from where I copied. Is there a match. Cat spells cat always. I cant change. So build of hadoop will also have same steps. How can I change it. All images used are snapshot of my own pc. Text is written by me except of 5 wiki lines. That too link is in references. What should I have been changed. Tell me.
|
|
|
|
|
You are running away from your responsibility by banning account instead of helping people to make it correct. Coz yeah... Click deactivate button... Less effort... Easy.... Right??
|
|
|
|
|
No, not at all.
It's harder to stop people plagiarising than it is to help them. Mostly because very few of them see that they have done anything wrong and that's a really, really difficult thing to teach people. It's called "ethics" or "morals" and the world's religions have been trying to instil a sense of them for thousands of years. Unsuccessfully, I should add.
But pointing out the stolen parts and saying "remove those" or "change these" to avoid the actual author noticing and being (rightfully) upset is trivial!
When you copy someone else's words and say "I wrote this" that's theft. No arguments are really possible - someone put a lot of effort into getting the words right and all the thief did was highlight it, copy it, paste it into a new document and "tweek" it. And moderators are authors; we all know how much work it is to write the words an article demands. Personally, I can write the code for an article in an afternoon, maybe less. But the word will take me a month, on and off - maybe a 1:30 work ratio. That's a big investment in time and effort, and that costs money - I could spend my time getting paid for a month's work at my normal hourly rate instead!
So when somebody thinks the equivalent of "sod it, I can't be bothered - I'll use what he wrote instead" we think "**** you, sunshine, and the horse you rode in on".
End of conversation.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the lecture, It seems like you are a social writer more than a technical. Also it seems like here we have no sense of differentiating a original article with a copy paste one, also I think here people does not believe in improving things & for your information mine is not a copy paste because I have spent around 50 hrs or about 8-10 days before writing it here.
I tested it again & again, tested my steps about 5 time on different machines, prepared a video, edited it.
I can not change steps involved in building hadoop but I can write a improved article, & that's what I did But here I ended with this blame.
Better you check references by your own, if you know what references mean.
And if possible please do not write 100 words about this world what you just did instead write how we can make it better.
Real End Of Conversation.
|
|
|
|
|
I've found at least two sentences which you copied from other people's work (after which I stopped looking for more). While two sentences aren't many it already refutes your statement of original authorship, destroys your reputation and makes me expect that there's more copy&paste.
From Hadoop2OnWindows - Hadoop Wiki[^]:
Quote: Hadoop version 2.2 onwards includes native support for Windows. The official Apache Hadoop releases do not include Windows binaries (yet, as of January 2014).
Your introduction:
Quote: Hadoop version 2.2 onwards includes native support for Windows, but the official Apache Hadoop releases do not include Windows binaries
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Ya and if you know what references mean then may be you should have not written that.
Everyone uses wiki descriptions also its not sufficient for blocking any article.
You can find such sentences in almost every article. Try on one of your.
Isn't your quote "If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson" seems copied and just by writing "Lyall Watson" you mean you have all access.
|
|
|
|
|
There is a Plagiarism FAQ on the article submission page. It is in bold to attract your attention to it. I have also emailed it to you. Pointing a finger at someone else doesn't mean you didn't plagiarize and the people in this forum put a lot of time and effort looking for plagiarism so please don't belittle their efforts.
We have explained our position on this matter. It is not a debate. Please look at the FAQ we provided you, try to learn from your mistake, and cease this back and forth. If you choose to continue arguing about this rather than letting it go and learning from it, then we simply want different things for this community and you will be removed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can I know what he wrote? Have defended him in the past and agree he was doing well this time.
|
|
|
|
|
I've slept since then! 
Something about homosexuality and Islam...I don't bother to try and remember his twaddle 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
احمد ابراهيم - Professional Profile - CodeProject[^]
Translated:
Ahmed Ibrahim
The company houses for home services water leakage detection spray pesticides in Riyadh Riyadh, moving furniture, Riyadh Riyadh furniture storage warehouses cleaning company in Riyadh water leakage detection anti-insect Riyadh transfer baggage storage furniture company in Riyadh, Riyadh Dammam water leaks detection removal company in Riyadh Riyadh homes restoration company
modified 24-Apr-16 1:12am.
|
|
|
|
|
| .
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
He's started on "Dragons" game hacks now...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
... Farmdale now!
|
|
|
|
|
10th kick applied.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final kick applied ![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
You always obtain more by being rather polite and armed than polite only.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
