|
Without having admin privileges on a box, you can't. You will only be able to identify the applications that are registered, or that you can search in public folders for. There will be many directories that you won't be able to access.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Not possible.
You can get a list of applications currently in memory using the Task Manager. You can see applications running under other contexts using the SysInternals Process Explorer.
You can't magically know what unloaded code will use as a runtime without actually examining it. That's like shaking a box at Christmas and trying to figure out exactly which GI Joe action figure grandma got you.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
- Benjamin Disraeli
|
|
|
|
|
There are third party utilities that you can use to inventory your system, but as others have pointed out there are limitations. And this is the type of thing you'll want to buy instead of trying to write yourself.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello...I am doing my project on Speech to text conversion.Can i do it by .Net .Can someone guide me how to begin it.What i need to learn for this.
|
|
|
|
|
Why don't you Google for ".net speech to text" and start reading?
|
|
|
|
|
Member 12967384 wrote: Can someone guide me how to begin it.What i need to learn for this.
There's an article here on this site, named "C# Speech to Text" that could be interesting. The subject is also documented on MSDN, along with the classes and namespaces you need.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Member 12967384 wrote: What i need to learn for this
.Net of course.
How to do some research like feeding ".net speech to text" into a search engine of your choice.
Selecting an API that fullfills your requirements.
Reading the API documentation and tutorials.
Becoming familiar with the API (e.g. by using example code).
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am writing an application for Windows Service, I want to run this Service for every 1 minutes, the Windows Service does call some database objects and performs operations, this is fine up to here. But my question is what if the first cycle of Windows Service didn't complete its operations and if second cycle starts, doesn't this interference can cause Service to fail.
Similar type of question I have for the Windows Scheduler too, what if the first cycle of Windows Schedule hasn't completed yet and as per timing if 2nd Scheduler cycle tries to run the same application, isn't it going to interfere and created Problems.
Any help a code snippet, a link or a suggestion is going to help me a lot, thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Abdul Aleem
"There is already enough hatred in the world lets spread love, compassion and affection."
|
|
|
|
|
Why not just code the service to do its own timing internally? That way you can prevent a new cycle from starting if a previous one has not completed.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much
Thanks,
Abdul Aleem
"There is already enough hatred in the world lets spread love, compassion and affection."
|
|
|
|
|
The Windows task scheduler has an option to not start a new instance if the task is already running.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much.
Thanks,
Abdul Aleem
"There is already enough hatred in the world lets spread love, compassion and affection."
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Richard,
Can you please give me the name of the option if you don't mind?
Thanks,
Abdul Aleem
"There is already enough hatred in the world lets spread love, compassion and affection."
|
|
|
|
|
It's at the bottom of the "settings" page:
Screen-shot[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
That could be answered in a few minutes by testing it. Create a task that writes somewhere for one minute. Start them from your service or the Task-scheduler, with an interval of 10 seconds.
So, unless you do something that locks (writing to files and the like) it should not fail.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much
Thanks,
Abdul Aleem
"There is already enough hatred in the world lets spread love, compassion and affection."
|
|
|
|
|
If you can add the request to in-memory .net queue it should solve your problem. Keep a thread which will monitor and trigger job from the queue. This way you can decide on a number of threads which can run parallelly (one or multiple).
Ashwin Shetty
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have a Console application which has to be repeatedly executed with some intervals. For that what I have done is, in main I have called the method that performs the action after that I put the Main into sleeping for a minute or so and then reexecuted it.
Here is my Code:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
ApplicationOrNamespaceName = typeof(Watcher).Namespace.ToString();
ClassName = "Watcher";
while (true)
{
RecordFile();
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(1000 * 60 * WatcherDB.GetCycleTimeForLoopingTheApplicationForEnvironment());
}
}
My question is, is it suggestible? OK? can this code bad for performance? or if you have any better approaches for performance please help me, any advice, link or code snippet is appreciated. Here I didn't use Windows Service or Scheduled Task because if the application is running and if Windows Service tries to access it again, then its a problem, maybe not true, but that's what I have thought. But any suggestions also fine my friends.
Thanks in advance my friends.
Thanks,
Abdul Aleem
"There is already enough hatred in the world lets spread love, compassion and affection."
|
|
|
|
|
You're getting down-voted because you're not thinking.
You put the thread to sleep! What is there to discuss in the way of "performance". It's not doing anything!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes it goes to sleep for 1 minute and reactivates, basically I have to run that ReadFiles() function for every 1 minute, but I want to wait until that function completes, wait for 1 minutes then call that function again.
Here this is serving my purpose but want to check if that's a good practice or will I have any issues going further.
About down votes my friend, its their way of saying things, if somebody asks me a question, I wouldn't put down vote for it, but that's my way of understanding things. I am asking because as I said serving the purpose is not the only aim I have if I can do something better, I wanted to know.
Thanks for saying me this my friend.
Thanks,
Abdul Aleem
"There is already enough hatred in the world lets spread love, compassion and affection."
|
|
|
|
|
Your question has nothing to do with the .NET framework.
Your question has nothing to do with threads. Your program has one thread and you are forcing it to do nothing which is no way performant.
indian143 wrote: Windows Service or Scheduled Task
Which indicates that you have no idea what a Windows Service or Scheduled Task is for. This is exactly what those projects are for.
Speed of sound - 1100 ft/sec
Speed of light - 186,000 mi/sec
Speed of stupid - instantaneous.
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, all you are doing here is putting the main thread to sleep. As designs go, that tends to be really poor.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I am putting it into sleep for 1 minute, then it activates again, I know about windows service and task schedulers, but every time putting them on the server involves deployment. This is just copy the files and right click and run as administrator.
My worry Pete does it (Thread sleeping) take lot of resources, but actually its serving my purpose, only question I have is if it takes lot of resources then I will go for the Windows Service or Task Scheduler.
Thanks,
Abdul Aleem
"There is already enough hatred in the world lets spread love, compassion and affection."
modified 17-Jan-17 2:57am.
|
|
|
|
|
Putting a thread to sleep doesn't take much in the way of resources - what it does do though is make the thread unresponsive to external stimulation. For a minute, it's unavailable to do anything. There are many suitable constructs you could use that would simplify the task, for instance you could use a Timer. As I work very heavily in RX, I would use RX to manage this but that's just me.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Pete, yeah sure I will definitely research about it, can you give me whats full-form of RX? My application is just working fine client is happy too, just its my curiosity to learn and implement good stuff init.
Again thanks for sharing me this information.
Thanks,
Abdul Aleem
"There is already enough hatred in the world lets spread love, compassion and affection."
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
