|
Sounds like somebody is trying to hack some software  , but you can set permissions on registry keys.
|
|
|
|
|
The only way to do that would be to setup permissions on that key preventing the user from reading it.
You can NOT prevent WinLogon from reading it's values. Why? Because even Windows has to login to itself! Various accounts, including Local System and service accounts, need access to WinLogon to execute.
I cannot think of a single reason why you would want to do this.
|
|
|
|
|
I will give you a single reason 
I want to write a remote desktop application with the ability to stop the legal banner from popping up therefore not requiring user action before the login/password/domain are sent, because that hoses the entire process since that window handle cannot be identified (because the contents are encrypted) I cannot close that legal banner pop up window ... however if I can stop it from opening then the result is the same.
|
|
|
|
|
You might want to check with your legal department first. You might not get away with circumventing that little screen, as annoying as it is.
|
|
|
|
|
If I can figure out how to do it, I will then ask ... no point in asking ahead of time if I can't do it.
Any idea how to do the block?
|
|
|
|
|
That's ass end backwards. Is there any reason to waste time researching how to do this if your legal department tells you that you can't do it? You're just costing your company money here.
|
|
|
|
|
If you have another way to do this, I am all ears
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, you just have to add Deny permissions to the SYSTEM account to key immediately above what you want to block.
I'd open regedit first, try setting this by hand yourself, and then see what happens. You may not be able to reverse what you've done. That being the case, I highly suggest trying this on a virtual machine or a machine you don't care about rebuilding.
Since WinLogon is also responsbile for loading the User Profile, you may get the ability to skip the legal screen, but lose the ability to completely login to the machine. You may also never get a shell, and you may lose all network connectivity to off-machine resources, such as network shares, ..., among other things...
Do you still think this is a good idea?? I know I wouldn't consider it a supportable solution in an Enterprise environment, or any other environment for that matter.
|
|
|
|
|
Since RDP encrypts the window and no one seems to have cracked that, I'm not sure if there is another solution besides this one?
I'd much rather go the route of decrypting the window contents, looking for the legal banner window handle to appear and sending an enter key to that the moment it appears, but I'm not even sure that is possible.
I'm all ears if anyone has any other ideas ...
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, I told you how to test this little theory out by hand. What's the point in trying to type in a bunch of code if the entire concepts won't work from the start. I can see a bunch of reasons why it won't, but I'm not going to test this for you. That's what you're getting paid to do.
|
|
|
|
|
I will be testing it that way, I'm just throwing it out there that if someone has a better idea on how to do this, I'm open to that.
When I'm done testing I will report back on how it worked.
|
|
|
|
|
This did work manually ... I'm having a very difficult time finding information on how to do this programatically though.
I haven't found any code examples that do this remotely, and that specify as to which group is the permission change is being done to.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok I finally got this to work programatically, it was quite a pain ... at least for me.
If you remove query access and then put it back, it works. It's quite simple I think.
|
|
|
|
|
dunno, but is regedt32.exe not ok?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello To All,
Please Help Me To Solve My Problem.
I am developing an Window Application. I just want to know that, what code should I write so that when user press the Update Version Button On Form, the Software Should get updated with new version Online. My Appliccation is Online.
Please Help Me.
Thanks & regards
Sanket Patil
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing more than a rewrite of Click Once
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
Hello
I am doing face detection in live camera, first I detect skin and then I copy that skin area from the original image and re-size to he 50(width) and 70(height), because my template is 50(width) by 70(height) size.
when I start so some frames are checked properly but after some moment (or some time at the first frame) the following exception is generated.
"Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt."
the above error is generated on below line in the code.
stor = ((rowTamplate[(h * pixelSize)] + rowTamplate[(h * pixelSize) + 1] + rowTamplate[(h * pixelSize) + 2]) / 3) - ((rowBitmap[(h * pixelSize)] + rowBitmap[(h * pixelSize) + 1] + rowBitmap[(h * pixelSize) + 2]) / 3);
I thought alot to understand this problem but I failed.
the actual code is here.
BitmapData templateData = template.LockBits(new Rectangle(0, 0, 50, 70), System.Drawing.Imaging.ImageLockMode.WriteOnly, template.PixelFormat)
bitmap = ImageResizer.ResizeImage(bitmap, 50, 70);
BitmapData bitmapData = bitmap.LockBits(new Rectangle(0, 0, 50, 70), System.Drawing.Imaging.ImageLockMode.WriteOnly, bitmap.PixelFormat);
double stor = 0;
for (int w = 0; w < 70; w++)
{
Byte* rowTamplate = (byte*)templateData.Scan0 + (w * templateData.Stride);
Byte* rowBitmap = (byte*)bitmapData.Scan0 + (w * bitmapData.Stride);
for (int h = 0; h < 50; h++)
{
stor = 0;
stor = ((rowTamplate[(h * pixelSize)] + rowTamplate[(h * pixelSize) + 1] + rowTamplate[(h * pixelSize) + 2]) / 3) - ((rowBitmap[(h * pixelSize)] + rowBitmap[(h * pixelSize) + 1] + rowBitmap[(h * pixelSize) + 2]) / 3);
if (stor < 0)
{
stor *= -1;
}
PixelsCounter += (int)stor;
stor = 0;
}
}
thanks
modified on Tuesday, December 28, 2010 9:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|
I suggest you read the forum guidelines, and use PRE tags. I don't read unformatted code.
|
|
|
|
|
sir I used pre tages please now check. and let me tell you sir every time when exception is generated I check the different run time values, the exception is raised every time when the value of w which is in upper loop reaches to 67.if i keep the upper loop lower than 67 so then every thing is ok. but i don't understand that what is the reason.
|
|
|
|
|
When you apply a filter to an image, you have to make sure that every pixel exists.
So this pseudo-code will fail:
for (x=0; x < imgWid; x++) {
for (y=0; y < imgHei; y++) {
calculate output pixel using pixel(x,y) as well as pixel(x+filterWid-1, y+filterHei-1);
}
}
For any filter size larger than one, the rightmost or bottommost pixels will fail as either x+filterWid-1 or y+filterHei-1 or both will lie outside the input image.
It is like moving a 2*2 block inside a 4*4 box; there aren't 4*4 positions, there are only 3*3.
A possible approach would be:
for (x=0; x < imgWid-filWid+1; x++) {
for (y=0; y < imgHei-filHei+1; y++) {
calculate output pixel using pixel(x,y) as well as pixel(x+filterWid-1, y+filterHei-1);
}
}
as now none of the indices will be outside the input image.
This really means the output image would be slightly smaller than the input image. Most image processing software will try and keep the output image the same size; they do this by cheating somehow, most often by adding a few imaginary rows and columns of pixels, either by using a dummy color (white or black), by replicating the top and bottom rows and left and right columns, or by mirroring the image.
So if your filter is 3*3, add an imaginary row above and below, and a column left and right.
|
|
|
|
|
Does Native C# can do all what WMI can do special for Remote PC??
umm i heart that and i heart also it will be faster so is it true ??
thanks all
bye
|
|
|
|
|
You might want to give an example of what you're talking about. I don't have a any idea of what you're trying to do.
And what's with the "I heart this and that" garbage??
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: what's with the "I heart this and that"
I think OP means "I heard ... "
Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
