Re: passing boolean as argument - C / C++ / MFC Discussion Boards

coda_x25-Sep-03 0:32

25-Sep-03 0:32

okie i did what u suggested as follows:

deleteID.Format("ID = %s", m_str_deleteID);
AfxMessageBox(deleteID);

then i run and my message box read "ID=" instead of "ID=xxx"....so wat is wrong with my code?

Adding Text With Superscript to Dialog Title Bar

Doug Knudson24-Sep-03 1:40

Doug Knudson

24-Sep-03 1:40

Hi,

My current task is to find a way to add superscripted text to the title bar of a CDialog based window, as in "MyWindow^superscript". My first thought was that there must be some control characters to embed in a CString that when sent to CWnd::SetWindowText(superscriptedText)would cause the text to be rendered. No luck on this front. Undaunted, I thought about making the superscripted text a graphic and drawing it in the Title Bar. I haven't been able to find any guidance on this approach for a CDialog derived class. Any help greatly appreciated!

I'm working in Visual C++ Version 6.

Thanks,
Doug

Doug Knudson

Re: Adding Text With Superscript to Dialog Title Bar

Roger Allen24-Sep-03 2:15

Roger Allen

24-Sep-03 2:15

This is the article you probably want http://www.codeproject.com/gdi/customcaption.asp?target=lorde[^]

Roger Allen
Sonork 100.10016

Were you different as a kid? Did you ever say "Ooohhh, shiny red" even once? - Paul Watson 11-February-2003

Converting app to Unicode

markhatsell24-Sep-03 1:07

markhatsell

24-Sep-03 1:07

Hello

I was just wondering if anyone knows of a tool that aids converting a Visual Studio C++ app from MBCS to Unicode. I have this huge task ahead of me and any helpful utilities would be very useful. What I bascially want is something that scans through all my files and converts all instances of char to TCHAR, string functions such as strcpy to their TCHAR eqivalent and converts literal string such as "Hello" to _T("Hello") plus hopefully deals with some of the more subtle conversion issues.

Does anyone know of such a tool?

Thanks
Mark

Re: Converting app to Unicode

Ravi Bhavnani24-Sep-03 4:34

Ravi Bhavnani

24-Sep-03 4:34

This would definitely be a tool worth writing!

/ravi

Let's put "civil" back in "civilization"
Home | Articles | Freeware | Music
ravib@ravib.com

MSComm, MFC, and Win98 compatibility problem

caykahve23-Sep-03 23:42

caykahve

23-Sep-03 23:42

Hi
I use Visual Studio 6 and have made a dialog based MFC application that uses the registered Activex component called "MS communications control version 6" (MSCOMM32.OCX) . My program does serial communication via an RS232 interface. I tested it under XP and WinNT 4: It works when I add MSCOMM32.OCX to the system32 folder. It did not work under Win98 2nd Edition. The dialog box didn't even show up. When I installed Visual studio, it showed up and worked but when I closed the application, windows couldn't be shut down (fatal error). I want it to work without installing visual studio. Does anybody have an idea how I can make it work?

Thanks

passing boolean as argument

PaulUK0123-Sep-03 23:38

PaulUK01

23-Sep-03 23:38

Hi. I have a boolean member variable assigned to a check box, but when I pass theis variable to a function I get the follwoing warning:

Warning C4800: 'int' : forcing value to bool 'true' or 'false' (performance warning)

Declaring a local boolean and passing that works fine, just not the member variable from the check box. So, is a member variable of type 'BOOL', as assigned by Class Wizard, a true boolean?

CODE:

func(bool a); //definition

func(m_boolPar1); //call to func - doesn't work

bool b;
func(b); //works fine

Thanks in advance. Frustrated & bemused!!

Re: passing boolean as argument

jhwurmbach23-Sep-03 23:58

jhwurmbach

23-Sep-03 23:58

You probably are passing your
func (bool a);
a BOOL - a MS typedef for int.

Change this

BOOL b = TRUE;
func (b);

BOOL b = TRUE;
func (b!=FALSE);

This way, you use the !=-operator to produce a bool from your BOOL. You test for != FALSE instead of == TRUE, because TRUE used to be defined as 1, but you want any non-null to be treated as TRUE.

When MS designed MFC, there was no real C++ standard, and certainly no Microsoft-compiler capable of understanding it.
A few ugly things from this times are still around: BOOL instead of bool, CArray instead of std::vector, lacking constness from many functions.

Who is 'General Failure'? And why is he reading my harddisk?!?

Re: passing boolean as argument

PaulUK0124-Sep-03 0:49

PaulUK01

24-Sep-03 0:49

Thanks for your reply, but I actually want to pass my member variable 'm_boolPar1' to func at many points throughout my program (it is a very big real time application to drive some test equipment).

In your example, wouldn't passing 'b' (or 'm_boolPar1') to func as...

func(b!=FALSE) // or func(m_boolPar1!=FALSE)

...mean that func always recieves a parameter with the same value, ie TRUE???

What I want to do is to pass the member variable 'm_boolPar1'(i.e. a BOOL - can't redefine this as 'bool' since this is not an option in the Class Wizard) to func.

I have also tried casting m_boolPar1 to bool...

bool b;
b=(bool)m_boolPar1

...but this also causes compiler problems.

Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Re: passing boolean as argument

jhwurmbach24-Sep-03 1:14

jhwurmbach

24-Sep-03 1:14

PaulUK01 wrote:
Wouldn't passing func(m_boolPar1!=FALSE) mean that func always recieves a parameter with the same value, ie TRUE???

The operator!= returns a C++ bool. If both of its parameter are not equal, it is supposed to return true.
In the call of func(m_boolPar1!=FALSE), the expression (m_boolPar1!=FALSE) evaluates to true if m_boolPar1 is not equal to FALSE (which happens to be #defined to be 0).
This bool will then be used as a parameter for the call to func().

So func() will be called with the desired bool value instead of a typedefed int.

Who is 'General Failure'? And why is he reading my harddisk?!?

Re: passing boolean as argument

PaulUK0124-Sep-03 2:02

PaulUK01

24-Sep-03 2:02

Ah, I see. I was forgetting my fundamentals of C !!! This works a treat now, even though the code does becomes slightly less readable.

Thanks again.

Re: passing boolean as argument

Ryan_Roberts24-Sep-03 0:03

Ryan_Roberts

24-Sep-03 0:03

Nope, its an integer. A hangover from before bool was implemented as a built in type in MSVC.

You can #pragma the warning out if its getting a bit noisy.

Ryan

Re: passing boolean as argument

Joaquín M López Muñoz24-Sep-03 0:04

Joaquín M López Muñoz

24-Sep-03 0:04

This is related to the old topic of what is the relationship between bool and BOOL. bool is a true C++ type, which can only take the values true and false, and usually occupies one byte of memory (this is so at least in your compiler). BOOL, on the other hand, is just a typedef alias of int. In most situations, you can use these two types interchangeably. Here, however, the compiler is telling you that, in order to feed a real bool to func when passed m_boolPar1 (which is a BOOL), it'll have to some intermediate conversion (basically, converting from an int to a byte), which may affect performance if this is called very often. I'm sure this is not your case, so you can shut your compiler up with:

func((bool)m_boolPar1);

Good luck.

Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

Re: passing boolean as argument

PaulUK0124-Sep-03 0:54

PaulUK01

24-Sep-03 0:54

Hi - thanks for your reply.

When I cast from BOOL to bool as suggested, the compiler gives the follwoing warning:

warning C4800: 'int' : forcing value to bool 'true' or 'false' (performance warning)

I think I'll just have to redisgn, replacing the the function to take integers instead of booleans. I cannot redefine my member variable as a 'bool' - Class Wizard doesn't have this option.

This is bad design practice as my design does use true booleans, but I don't see how I can assign a true boolean to a member variable.

Thanks again

Paul

CPropertyPage OnOk?

murali_utr23-Sep-03 23:15

murali_utr

23-Sep-03 23:15

hi,
i have some validation on onok of the page. the validation is not satisfied means i don't want to close the dialog. what's the solution.

thanks in advance

Re: CPropertyPage OnOk?

Roland Bär23-Sep-03 23:34

Roland Bär

23-Sep-03 23:34

in the overwritten function you should not call CPropertyPage::OnOK() if you are not satisfied with the Values.

the better way is to overwrite the Function OnApply(), because this is called when OK or when Apply is clicked.

Greets
Roland

Fit into the A4 Paper

sdfdsfa23-Sep-03 22:46

sdfdsfa

23-Sep-03 22:46

I am trying to adjust the printed image size fit into
the paper size which is about A4.

I have tried to change those parameters for GetDeviceCaps functions. seemingly, I can't get the right size.
Does anyone have solution to this?

if( pInfo )
{
CClientDC dc( this );
pDC->SetMapMode(MM_ANISOTROPIC);

CSize sz( dc.GetDeviceCaps(LOGPIXELSX), dc.GetDeviceCaps(LOGPIXELSY) );
pDC->SetWindowExt( sz );
sz = CSize( pDC->GetDeviceCaps(LOGPIXELSX),pDC->GetDeviceCaps(LOGPIXELSY) );
pDC->SetViewportExt( sz );
}

shi

a challenge

harshsingh23-Sep-03 21:48

harshsingh

23-Sep-03 21:48

I have an application...when someone calls me(via a modem) I need to initialize the device on his side, so is it possible in some way to know that the call has been made to me....so that I can automate the process and without any manual interaction on my side I can acivate my friend's device.....actually I want that if the application is running and I am not there he should not face any problems
Smile | :)

Maverick

Re: a challenge

Michael P Butler23-Sep-03 21:54

Michael P Butler

23-Sep-03 21:54

harshsingh wrote:
I need to initialize the device on his side

What do you mean by this? Initialize which device?

Your question is confused. Can you explain step-by-step what you want to achive and in which area you are struggling with the code.

Michael

'Curiosity's always been my downfall' - The Doctor: The Caves of Androzani

Re: a challenge

harshsingh24-Sep-03 3:22

harshsingh

24-Sep-03 3:22

Sorry for the confusion......
suppose you have a device and you are at a remote location, where you have a modem and a phone line with you.....and suppose that you want to connect to your PC at your home and so you send a request(your PC is on) so is it possible somehow,that by using the APIs provided in VC++ we can program our system(PC) in such a way that whenever it gets a request it automatically programs the device(which is presently at the remote location).

I guess I make sense now

regards
Harsh

about overload : operate new

1.5kg23-Sep-03 21:43

1.5kg

23-Sep-03 21:43

I want to get this code:

// -->
class A
{
public:
A(int a) { m_a = a; }
public:
int m_a;
};

FILE *fp = fopen("C:\\test.txt", "wt");

A* obj = new (fp) A(10);

fclose(fp);

// <--

When this code run over, the C:\test.txt file will be written in 10. Just as A(10).
In other words, the operate new Function can save A(10) before A construct function implement.
I can't solve it!

My project have the same codes, but I have no sourcecode. I want to know how to do?

I need your help~~~~ Thanks a lot~~~

Re: about overload : operate new

Joaquín M López Muñoz23-Sep-03 23:55

Joaquín M López Muñoz

23-Sep-03 23:55

What is the intention of your program? If you want to write the integer 10 to a file, then your attempt is way off target. In the expression

A* obj = new (fp) A(10);

you are (mistankely) using the so-called placement new, which has nothing to do with writing to a file.

Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

Re: about overload : operate new

1.5kg24-Sep-03 16:56

1.5kg

24-Sep-03 16:56

I know i should overload this operater new, such as:
void* operater new(size_t n, FILE *fp)
{
// some code
}

Now I want to get this object A(10) in the operater new function, so i can save this object's value.

But as you know, the construct function always be implemented after operate new funtction, How do I now?

My English is poor, please never mind Smile | :)

Re: about overload : operate new

Joaquín M López Muñoz24-Sep-03 20:04

Joaquín M López Muñoz

24-Sep-03 20:04

OK, now I see what you are trying to do. I am afraid your idea is not realizable in C++. Overloads of new cannot have access to the object being constructed because construction takes place later. The sequence of operations performed by the compiler is

Call the operator new (the default or a user-defined version) passing the size of the object to be constructed.
new allocates the memory as it sees fit and returns a void *.
The compiler uses this pointer to lay out the object, calling then its constructor.

So, by the time your overloaded new is called, the object does not even exist. I don't think you can workaround this.

Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

Device input/output range...

Manikandan23-Sep-03 21:13

Manikandan

23-Sep-03 21:13

Hi,

anybody know how to get the input/output range programmatically by passing the device name ???

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.