|
God I feel like an idiot! Now that I have that said I am now getting this error:
<br />
--------------------Configuration: fun - Win32 Debug--------------------<br />
Compiling...<br />
fun.cpp<br />
c:\documents and settings\np0383\my documents\c++\fun.cpp(2) : fatal error C1021: invalid preprocessor command 'pramga'<br />
Error executing cl.exe.<br />
<br />
fun.exe - 1 error(s), 0 warning(s)<br />
Nick Parker
|
|
|
|
|
sorry.. that's "pragma", not "pramga" 
-c
Conservative:
Faith is the quality that enables you to eat blackberry jam
on a picnic without looking to see whether the seeds move.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok Chris, your the man, that did it, really...THANKS!
Could possibly explain to me (or point me to a link that explains) what #pragma does, what its for and why the hell does MVC++ puke without it in there. On a side note it still threw all those warnings with the #pragma in, however it compiled? Thanks again.
Nick Parker
|
|
|
|
|
#pragma can do a lot of things. in this case, we're just telling the compiler to suppress those particular warnings. but, you'll find, as you use more STL, that even the mighty pragma can't turn off all warnings in all situations - the STL headers will enable warnings on their own, and the warnings will show up regardless of what you say.
pragma can also force compliations errors or warnings, it can cause automagic linking to static libs, and much more.
most of the STL warnings are harmless. i treat that pragma as simply part of using STL
-c
Conservative:
Faith is the quality that enables you to eat blackberry jam
on a picnic without looking to see whether the seeds move.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the tip, I really appreciate it, I am out looking for more information on #pragma now.
Nick Parker
|
|
|
|
|
try adding this:
#include <string>
-c
Conservative:
Faith is the quality that enables you to eat blackberry jam
on a picnic without looking to see whether the seeds move.
|
|
|
|
|
You should not call destructor explicitly.
vList.~vector();
Calling destructor explicitly is very advanced C++ when someone is managing the memory itself (STL does it at a couple of places). In particular, this should not be done if the object is one the stack (the destructor will be called twice, once manually and one automatically which can cause memory corruption and a bunch of problems).
The only time, destructor are called explicitly is when memory is allocated explicitly and placement new is used to construct the object at that location.
Philippe Mori
|
|
|
|
|
If I want to have a db that will not allow any duplicates in a certain field what do I do? In code if someone tries to put in data thats duplicate for that particular field, how will the entry be prevented? Does Access have an inbuilt feature for this? Thanks,
ns
|
|
|
|
|
Most databases will not let you have duplicates for keys. And the corresponding ADO, OLEDB, ODBC driver will throw an exception when the happens. You just need to trap the exception, decipher it and then let the user know. And yes, Access will throw an exception if you try to enter a duplicate for a primary key. At least it did in Access 2.0. ( Am I ancient or what? )
|
|
|
|
|
Okay. Thanks. A dumb question. How do you trap an exception?
Thanks,
ns
|
|
|
|
|
Read up on exception handling. Look at some of the ADO samples on this site you will find several try and catch statements. Something like:
try{
Your insert and other database code
}
catch( dbexception ) {
Handle it here
}
|
|
|
|
|
When you define the field, set a unique index on it. It will not allow duplicates. That is done in the lower left corner of the table definition screen.
|
|
|
|
|
Dear freinds,
hi!!
i have a some problem plz any one can help me........
actually i am working on a apllication which draw a curves on the basis of input data(x & Y coordinates) on graph sheet like a excel.This application is developed in VC++ using MFC.
To make a this application a more generalized i want add functionality that- end user will write a simple console 'c' program to calculate two arrays of x & y coordinates & include some file say plot.h & then pass this array by calling some function say plot(x,y).
then finally result will display on our interface instead of default output window.
so , I want to know that is it possible the output is redirected on our interface.
plz. help me.
thanks!
ashutosh agrawal
mail me at:
ashutosh_agrawal78@rediffmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
Does anyone know if it is possible to create multiple timers using CreateWaitableTimer and then (in another thread) in a loop use to WaitForMultipleObjects to wait on when the timer handles get a signal
I got this too work for a single timer object but when I try it with more than one, WaitForMultipleObjects returns immediately and return 0, which (according to the MSDN docs) is not a return code that is described.
If any one knows of a better way than CreateWaitableTimer that would be cool too (SetTimer is not an option). I guess I could use the multimedia timer but I would like to get things to work with CreateWaitableTimer if possible
Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
Jim Crafton wrote:
Does anyone know if it is possible to create multiple timers using CreateWaitableTimer and then (in another thread) in a loop use to WaitForMultipleObjects to wait on when the timer handles get a signal
Yes, it is possible and should work without any problem.
I suppose your problem is somwhere else. Maybe you could post some code.
BTW: 0 is the value of WAIT_OBJECT_0 and therefore well defined. It just tells you, that the very first object from your object handle array was signaled.
--
Daniel Lohmann
http://www.losoft.de
(Hey, this page is worth looking! You can find some free and handy NT tools there  )
|
|
|
|
|
Here is the scenario. I develop scientific software for a group solidly rooted in Linux. All of the IDE's for Linux pale in comparison to VC++ (which I have used for a while). I have two machines on my desk. One is a MS2K box, the other a Redhat 7.2 box. I would like to devleop and debug on the Win2K using VC++, but the code is running on the Redhat box. Both boxes can communicate to each other (I have used cygwin to transfer files before)via the LAN they are on.
I want to set up a process to automate the communication so that I am debugging the software running on the Linux system. There must be a way to terminal the VC++ into the Linux box to do this since they can see each other, but I know not how.
Does anyone know how I can do this or am I chasing a dream....
Contact me directly at rwhite@lanl.gov
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there,
I have created a multiple thread using a same thread in a class ( based on article from Derek Lakin on threading ). But I cannot share a member variable in that class between the two threads ( memory violation error ). Is there any way to get around this? I have no idea at all. 
Thx a lot
|
|
|
|
|
Is the access violation error resulting from two or more threads accessing the same area of the access memory location? You could use thread synchronization such as a CRITICAL_SECTION or a mutex.
Kuphryn
|
|
|
|
|
Use a global variable, not a member of the class.
|
|
|
|
|
I have some code where i try to display a dialog box where a user can choose a specific format. I've filled all the parts of the struct that needs to be filled accoring to the MSDN, but still i get an unhandled exception when running the function. Here's my code:
ACMFORMATCHOOSE acmChoose;
WAVEFORMATEX fmtChoose = { 0 };
acmChoose.pwfx = &fmtChoose;
acmChoose.cbwfx = sizeof(fmtChoose);
acmChoose.cbStruct = sizeof(acmChoose);
acmChoose.hwndOwner = ghWnd;
acmFormatChoose(&acmChoose);
Where ghWnd is a valid handle to my main window.
Anyone know what could be wrong?
Thankyou all, all input is appreciated.
-Rune Svendsen
|
|
|
|
|
I have know idea what is wrong with your code. If you handle the exception, you will find out what the problem is. Add try/catch to your code to catch the exception.
Something like this:
try {
ACMFORMATCHOOSE acmChoose;
WAVEFORMATEX fmtChoose = { 0 };
acmChoose.pwfx = &fmtChoose;
acmChoose.cbwfx = sizeof(fmtChoose);
acmChoose.cbStruct = sizeof(acmChoose);
acmChoose.hwndOwner = ghWnd;acmFormatChoose(&acmChoose);
}
catch (CExcpetion *e) {
handle the excption here ...
This is a general exception. You can catch specific derivitives with things like
catch (CFileException ...
catch (CMemoryException...
These are classes derived from CExcpetion. Your code can have multiple catch clauses for a try clause.
The first catch that qualifies will get the exception.
try {
...
}
catch (CMemoryException *e)
{
...
}
catch (CExceptin *e)
{
...
}
catch (CFileException *e)
{
... This will neverget executed, even if a file exceptionis thrown.The more general CException handler above will get it instead. Be careful of the order. Exceptin handling is a fairly deep topic and a fundamental of windows programming. I'd suggest you research windows exception handling in MSDN or other sources.
|
|
|
|
|
1) What is the debugger telling you in detail about the execption? (Exception type like "Microsoft C++ exception" or "Access violation" or something like that.)
2) If you choose Cancel to debug your app, where exactly the program is halted? This is the point in code which throws the exception.
3) If the above does not give you any helpful information, it might also be a worthwhile option to single-step your code in the debugger to see where exactly the exception occurs.
--
Daniel Lohmann
http://www.losoft.de
(Hey, this page is worth looking! You can find some free and handy NT tools there )
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, Hello,
i have a problem with the doc/view architecture. i am very new to this:
the problem:
i derive a class from "cview" and want to add event when the right mouse button is clicked on the view. on this event, i want to close (destroy) the window.
i tried several comands to close the window. but none of them worked. all i got was memory problems!
who can help me
thanx in advance
kevin
|
|
|
|
|
do this from your view:
GetParentFrame()->PostMessage(WM_CLOSE);
(note that in an SDI app, this will close the whole app)
-c
Conservative:
One who admires radicals centuries after they're dead.
-- Leo C. Rosten
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to associate a file type with a document, but to have no visible view, or even no view at all?
I want the file type to be handled by my app, but not to open up a child window. I only want to process it in OnOpenDocument.
thanks,
Jake
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
