|
We updated one of our servers, which runs a service to sync files between our web servers.
The service was failing to run after the upgrade, but I've corrected the issue.
Your article download files appear to be ok now.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your prompt answer Matthew. I know how pleasant these weekend happenings are 
Mircea
|
|
|
|
|
I'd be really surprised if this issue has not been brought up a dozen times already - but as it prevails, I repeat it:
Maybe it has to do with Corona, or Christmas vacation: The last few weeks it has been even more prominent that some threads are kept alive for a week, maybe two weeks, maybe more, by new comments and follow-ups.
So there is this orange bullet marking updated forums. But where are the updates? The other day, I found the first update after flipping through eleven 50-entry pages with no marks: I found it among entries 551-600. The following day, the first new entry was among entries 501-550.
Usually, I flip through no more than ten pages, but every now and then I decide: I will find that new entry! Finding these page 11 and 12 entries were a result of such determination 
But: You do know of the new entries. You know to put that orange bullet flagging the forum, in the left hand column. So, now that you know of the new entries, why couldn't you also indicate in which pages they were found, e.g. by displaying the page numbers underlined, or in some other color?
That "Latest post" frame is of course OK, but it is too limited (and for some reason, it isn't always there). A page flag, "This page has new entries", would be far more flexible/helpful.
|
|
|
|
|
trønderen wrote: This page has new entries
I like it.
I'll have to see what sort of load it puts on the system to find the page where the new post is. What we currently do is update the "last updated" property of the forum itself and so, when listing forums, we can give a yes/no on new posts. Querying for new posts since you last visited is an expensive operation (when multiplied across all viewers) which is the only way we could, prior to displaying a page, get an idea of where the new post is.
Another option is "New topics" vs "New replies". A reply could be to a post 5 years ago. A new post will always be at the top of the first page.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Or use the search page. For example, the new Lounge Messages Search
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Type an asterisk in the search bar above the forum posts and press enter. Newly added replies will magically appear.
|
|
|
|
|
Cool. thanks
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I received an email notification about a reply to one of my messages in the Lounge forum. However, there is no trace of the reply in that forum. I see no reason for the message to be censored in any way.
I'd like to make the replier aware of this, and acknowledge his comment. If there is an option for sending personal messages to the replier, it must be well hidden. I was unable to find it.
This may be by design, to protect members from being flushed by mail - spam, hate mail, or whatever. But when a reply isn't displayed in the forum, there ought to be some way to notify the replier.
(I was considering that maybe the reply to the forum was just a little delayed, but the the email notification is now 21 hours old. I received an email notification of another reply 11 hours ago, and that replay has been available in the Lounge for some hours already. So I don't think it can be ascribed to me being impatient!)
|
|
|
|
|
Could you provide the link to the message reply that was in included in the email please.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Gee ... it helps complaining! Now, after 21 hours, the reply is displayed (with a trailer: "modified 39 secs ago.")
If you want to investigate why it wasn't displayed for 21 hours, the link to the (now displayed) reply is
The Lounge[^]
I cannot see any difference between the comment in the email notification and the one now visible. So I have no clue why it was invisible for 21 hours.
|
|
|
|
|
It looks like it got flagged as SPAM, which it is not.
I have restored it and am looking at the referenced site. what memories.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
... on this weeks survey !?
Exception up = new Exception("Something is really wrong.");
throw up;
|
|
|
|
|
You're going to have to give them more than that, you know!
What post? When? Did it appear? If so, when did it disappear?
You know the drill for debugging!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I was in the middle of those "Message Closed".
Exception up = new Exception("Something is really wrong.");
throw up;
|
|
|
|
|
Ah.
That may have been me getting carried away, I'm not sure. When was it deleted? I've haven't deleted any for ... oooh, 8 or so hours, at a guess?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Probably the same time.
Exception up = new Exception("Something is really wrong.");
throw up;
|
|
|
|
|
|
On your articles please ensure the "Email Alerts" box has alerts set:
This should happen automatically, but we've seen it occasionally fail.
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov wrote: do we have an option to keep all e-mail subscriptions but direct all post notifications only to the site notification, without sending e-mail
No, not yet I'm afraid.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
Oh... well, I found this set of article notification options very reasonable.
Thank you!
However, now I'll need to repeat setting them for different articles separately, but this is not a big deal.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Synchronization with Visual C++ and the Windows API now shows an artful rendering of Bob, and Do not try and find the page. That’s impossible. Instead only try to realise the truth
I guess the truth is that a bit of divine intervention, or possibly some help from Bob, is required to get it back online …
Best regards
Espen Harlinn
Espen Harlinn
Senior Architect - Ulriken Consulting AS
The competent programmer is fully aware of the strictly limited size of his own skull; therefore he approaches the programming task in full humility, and among other things he avoids clever tricks like the plague.Edsger W.Dijkstra
|
|
|
|
|
We had a SQL update that took the database down for a short period this morning. This is probably what caused the issue.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Right, it is back again 
Espen Harlinn
Senior Architect - Ulriken Consulting AS
The competent programmer is fully aware of the strictly limited size of his own skull; therefore he approaches the programming task in full humility, and among other things he avoids clever tricks like the plague.Edsger W.Dijkstra
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure why it happens, but it happens pretty often the last time...
Last example: This message in the S&A Forum (around an hour ago)
Spam article: Why use Python for AI and Machine Learning (3RI Technologies) - gone[^]
@GregUtas reported spam. The link he posted to the article, ended pointing to a draft. This draft appears as " - CodeProject" in the browser tab, but the link itself get the correct label "Why use Python for AI and Machine Learning"
I go to report the article but there is no red flag because it is only a draft, ok... no problem (not the first time).
I go to "revisions" (there is only one only revision as "pending" but not draft). I click on the "1" (Revision number) and open it in a new tab, it gets a new link to a full version of the article with red flag and the correct label in the browser tab.
Then I go to the forum, I paste the link... and the link gets the label " - CodeProject"...
Previously 2 reports by @Sandeep-Mewara in a row on Jan 11th
Spammer in article moderate (NulavanceNewZealand, Nulavance NZ...) - Another[^]
and
Spammer in article moderate (AglowMoversAndPackers, Packers and movers in...)[^]
I would say that it has happened 5 or 6 times in the last two / three weeks and it happens time and again.
It is confusing and a bit annoying,
and a luck for some spammers, because without posting the "new" link, then the pending article remains active until you delete it manually.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 13-Jan-21 10:01am.
|
|
|
|
|
As I understand the issue:
- Spammer posted and article and it was made pending
- a report was made in the S&A forum about the article with a link to the pending article
- clicking on the link takes you to the pending article which does not have a flag for reporting
- there was a version 1 that you could go to that would allow reporting.
So I think we need to make sure that pending articles can be reported. Probably a simple correction.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Not exactly...
The article must have been in moderation, if not... the reporter would have not seen it. (Which for me is the status "pending")
The article gets reported with the link from the moderation queue and gets the correct label in the report message in S&A forum.
I come an hour later and want to report the article, the already posted link, brings me to a draft where there is no text at all, only the legend "this is an auto-saved draft, you can see...". This draft has the correct label (a.k.a. Article name) in the browser tab. This draft has no red flag.
I go to "versions", there is only one item "1" in the history list (I am protector and I can usually see other copies like "working status" and I would say even drafts in the revision history, need to check for sure)
Once I have clicked in "1" from the history list, I land into the full version of the spam article (supposedly the same that was before in moderation and got reported in the first instance). I copy its link.
I paste the copied link in the S&A forum, so the article can be nuked by the rest of the "squad".
The link gets the "- CodeProject" label from the script, without any title.
IMO, there are several issues at once.
1) The originally posted link from the first report, that ends landing in an auto-saved draft and without proper "article name" in browser tab.
2a) The draft without red-flag (easy to solve, as you say)
2b) The empty versions list (no draft or anything else but the "1" version in moderation)
3) The "no name" clickety when pasting the new link
Next time it happens I will take several screenshots, I think they are needed
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
