|
Hi developers and hamsters! 
It is possible to click reply on a removed message (yes quite handy to see what the message was about). But if you try to write and submit a reply you'll get the following cryptic message, perhaps a different message or disabling the edit field and preview/submit buttons would be more user friendly?
Items that need attention:
* This message is unavailable
Cheers, M
|
|
|
|
|
I'll update the wording
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I was browsing recent questions, and came across this. It says it's locked by CG, and the lock will expire in -7 minutes (it was -5 a couple of minutes ago!) I don't know who, if anyone, is editing it, but the question body is definitely screwed up. [I was going to attach the frame source here, but it's wayyyyy too big.] With any luck you'll get to see it before the whole thing explodes in a puff of hamster vapour.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks OK now.
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I'm actually looking at it in another tab. All fixed now, but it was a mess. The negative lock time was what I was really reporting. 
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994.
|
|
|
|
|
I've seen that a couple of times, but have never had the same circumstances to get it - so I never reported it. Annoying though!
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
Cool! I'll add that to the bug list.
|
|
|
|
|
He'll probably blame it on one of his many corporate enemies.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't you shoot them all yet?
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't shot anyone since 1978.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
A suggestions for you...
It seems pretty common that people ask questions about articles in the quick answers forum, which is useless because they should be posting at the bottom of the article (example: here). Perhaps when somebody clicks "Ask a Question" in the Q&A menu from an article, they should be directed to a page that says:
"You Shall Not Pass" Message: Do you want to ask a question about the article you were just looking at? If so, then please go back to the article by clicking this link. Otherwise, proceed to the general purpose forum, Quick Answers, by clicking the appropriate button below.
[Ask A Technical Question in Quick Answers] [Ask a Question About The Article]
Either that, or have the "Ask a Question" link navigate to the messages at the bottom of the article (or navigate directly to the page that allows the user to create a new post at the bottom of the article).
|
|
|
|
|
The Quick Answers drop-menu, when viewed from an article, has a menu item at the very top saying "Ask a question on this Article". Clicking it takes you to the discussion board for that article.
People don't read.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The menu system seems to be going a bit bonkers at the moment (won't open in IE and won't close and has no style in Firefox), but I think I understand what you are saying.
By giving them both options, you are giving them the opportunity to skip over "Ask a Question on this Article" and they go straight to "Ask a Question". By providing a page with descriptive buttons that they actually have to read, that slows them down a bit and makes them think.
An alternative would be to have the menu say "Ask a Question" (that option would not do anything when clicked) then have a submenu that says "Ask a Question About This Article" (takes the user to the bottom of the article) and "Ask a Question About Something Else" (takes the user to QA). That saves you from having to write an entirely new page, and it still makes the user think about which option they click. Having it as a submenu also makes it immediately clear that there are multiple ways to ask a question.
|
|
|
|
|
I hesitate to make things more complicated and slow for 99% of users because of the remaining 1% who will never do what you would like them to do anyway.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Fair enough. It's easy enough to just delete their question from QA and direct them to the right location.
|
|
|
|
|
you have an entire reputation system available, so you know who the experienced users are; they indeed should not be punished for the mistakes committed by some of the newbies. The latter however could be better served by a slower approach, with more instructions, formatted such that they are likely to be noticed and read.
So my suggestion is adapt the user interface to the user level: e.g. give all sub-silver accounts (*) the verbose treatment. This is likely to help the newcomers (the site is complex and overwhelming at first), and it will save all of us from some of the annoying misbehavior by a few.
Yes I'm aware it would cause a (or one more) bifurcation in the site's behavior, making it slightly more difficult to test and to explain.
(*) or sub-bronze (ignoring Participation) or whatever threshold seems right;
and obviously when not logged in, everyone is sub-bronze.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: People don't read.
Amen! Teach Us Brother!
|
|
|
|
|
I am getting an UNSAFE script warning in firefox 3.6.8 on Windows 7 64 whenever I go to any article page. What is causing this?
|
|
|
|
|
Probably a flash ad.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I have adblock plus installed. these are the items blocked.
###ctl00_BottomAd
###ctl00_LeftHandAd
###ctl00_TopAd
###ctl00_TowerAd
##.container-adwords
/adserve/*
I don't think it was an ad.
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately if you're using third party add-ins to modify the HTML your browser renders then I can't offer much in the way of support.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Still got it when I turned adblock off.
|
|
|
|
|
This is strictly my personal opinion. But I do think it's gracious to not block ads on a website that's run on ad-revenue when you do benefit from the articles and forums on there. And more particularly when the ads are as non-intrusive as they possibly could be and are also invariably from developer-related companies/components.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree entirely. I have AdBlocker installed, however I don't use it to hide the ads that show on CP. I don't mind them being there, unless they are faulty and hamper normal page loading.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know why every time when I update / post article, some garbage text are automatically added at the bottom of my post... What is the issue? 
Thanks
Md. Marufuzzaman
I will not say I have failed 1000 times; I will say that I have discovered 1000 ways that can cause failure – Thomas Edison.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
