|
Did that to once I was told not to bother them! 
modified 30-Nov-15 8:29am.
|
|
|
|
|
When I changed to my actual company I had 2x Set of interviews
The first time, I called after 10 days to ask, they told me to be patient because they were doing other related things. I had to wait almost 3 weeks to get the "sorry, but the acquisition of the new project failed and we can't hire new people right now".
Second time (3 months later they contacted me to offer me an interview for other department) I got the "If you want it, you have it" after 3 days.
A company called me last month to ask about a CV I sent them in mid 2014 
Time is a variable thing, and it depends a lot on your attractiveness for the company.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I was interviewed for my current position in March 2013 & got the offer of appointment in October 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
If you got the interview through an agent call them as often as you like, although I've found the tend to call each day even if they have nothing to tell you then go quiet when they find out you haven't got it.
It is good practice to ask when you will hear from them at the end of the interview, then you are more than justified to chase if you've not heard.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
I just noticed that all Intel Corp. articles begin with
"This article is for our sponsors at CodeProject."
(e.g: Intel® IoT Platforms: File Transfer for Linux using SCP[^] )
If CP is sponsoring Intel then I guess we are pretty rich! But I fear that the intended meaning is the slightly clunky "sponsoree".
Life is too shor
|
|
|
|
|
I just looked at the article. In the top right corner there are pictures of boards that seem to be in the same sphere as the Raspberry Pi.
Also if you look at the Author it is a Code Project Group member. Clicking on the 3 members hyperlink gives me Chris Maunder, Gunjan Rawal and Joel De Guzman.
A quick Google of Gunjan Rawal bought up an option that had Intel at the end. Clicking it shows she works for Intel.
I reckon that Code Project is sponsoring the Piesque boards as they will be used as a coding tool for the beginners with little money. Look out for a forum for these coming soon.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for that clarification.
Life is too shor
|
|
|
|
|
For all martial arts people out there.
I'm writing a "paper" for my black belt exam. The paper is about why some techniques are easy for some and very difficult for others and why some techniques sometimes never seem to work. I explain this by using the "Cycle of Considerations"[^] from Kenpo (We're doing Jiu-Jitsu/kenpo hybrid) and try to add some solutions to the problem.
One simple example is that it could be difficult to throw a person with an 'o goshi' (hip throw). One reason for this might be that it is a large (and/or heavy) person. In the cycle of Considerations you could see this as "Environment" and the solution is to try the technique with someone smaller (and lighter) or to use another technique.
A few questions for those who want to respond.
1) Do you know other models similar to this Cycle of Considerations? (Can you point me to them?)
2) If techniques don't work for you (or your partners/colleagues a the club), what kind of problems are those and how do you solve it?
Many thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Sadly i am out of Martial arts for too long to give an appropriate answer to your question but i remember that we used our "enemys" momentum to cope with such problems as height and weight.
I remember that some throws could be done easily whilst using the opponents momentum to your favor and just directing it to your wished destination. But maybe this only worked with unworthy foes 
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
ha ha. Yep, those principles are the basis of all our techniques as well, but it is not appropriate in all cases.
|
|
|
|
|
But at last everything is about flows and directing chi 
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
My beloved Krav Maga has these[^] principles. The basic philosophy is "render an opponent unwilling or unable to continue". It's a surprisingly effective mantra.
If techniques don't work for you, you don't continue with them. Krav is NOT a martial art. Krav is a system of self defence, so the moves have to be instinctive.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: "render an opponent unwilling or unable to continue"
That sounds like violence and that is frowned upon.  See?
Just because someone is trying to hurt you or take your belongings doesn't mean you should act out your violence and oppression upon him/her.
You need to see things from the poor attacker's point of view. S/he may be hungry or upset that you have money and s/he doesn't.
Get some counseling. 
|
|
|
|
|
I got some counselling. I go all therapy on their ass.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
A true LOL!
Ah, laughing on Monday. DIdn't know it was possible.
|
|
|
|
|
Shirley, a Chuck Norris reference should easily earn guarantee you enough points to pass. WWCD What Would Chuck Do?
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
My son was at a football (soccer) party when a little oik put him in a headlock. watching from the other end of the pitch I watched him step into his opponent and deliver a few swift punches to the oik's nose over his shoulder. Oik let go and was friendly to him for rest of the party.
He hadn't taken any martial arts at that point in time, so I asked him why he chose that solution - his response was 'I thought about what would Indy do'.
|
|
|
|
|
A boy wise beyond his years, wish mine would do this sometimes.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
As has oft been pointed out, every fighter has a plan until they get hit.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: One reason for this might be that it is a large (and/or heavy) person. In the cycle of Considerations you could see this as "Environment" and the solution is to try the technique with someone smaller (and lighter) or to use another technique.
Surely the first consideration should be is my technique correct. During training the initial response should be 'work with someone who can help improve my technique', and then in sparring it should be 'is my technique still right or what defense are they using to counteract my throw'?
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I'm saying. Obviously I don't make mistakes like that, but new members do...
|
|
|
|
|
Personally I still make technical errors, find myself thinking later that a different technique or slightly different application during sparring would have been better, but that's why we stop, evaluate, improve isn't it
|
|
|
|
|
My instructor often talks about the classic picture of yin and yang and how that is used when deciding how to go up against an opponent.
For instance, yin and yang could represent soft and hard. If your opponent is a lot bigger / more powerful or has longer reach than you do, you're likely not going to beat him using techniques that are designed to overpower him (so called 'hard' techniques). The way to beat him would be to use soft techniques like speed / deception / getting him off balance.
Hope this helps. Good luck with your black belt exam
|
|
|
|
|
actually this is the answer up until now that makes the most sense. thanks! 
(Damnit we need a ninja icon !  )
|
|
|
|
|
Movie Quote Of The Day
After a week of absence, here we are again...
I see death every day. Some by accident, some by sickness, but some through despair.
Which movie?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
