Click here to Skip to main content
15,922,145 members
Home / Discussions / C#
   

C#

 
GeneralRe: Breaking Up Classes Pin
inayathussaintoori27-Jan-11 14:04
inayathussaintoori27-Jan-11 14:04 
GeneralRe: Breaking Up Classes Pin
musefan28-Jan-11 5:58
musefan28-Jan-11 5:58 
GeneralRe: Breaking Up Classes Pin
Luc Pattyn28-Jan-11 6:14
sitebuilderLuc Pattyn28-Jan-11 6:14 
AnswerRe: Breaking Up Classes Pin
PIEBALDconsult27-Jan-11 14:09
mvePIEBALDconsult27-Jan-11 14:09 
AnswerRead this ebook from los techies about the SOLID principles Pin
i.j.russell28-Jan-11 1:36
i.j.russell28-Jan-11 1:36 
AnswerRe: Breaking Up Classes Pin
Alan Balkany28-Jan-11 3:07
Alan Balkany28-Jan-11 3:07 
AnswerRe: Breaking Up Classes Pin
fjdiewornncalwe28-Jan-11 4:12
professionalfjdiewornncalwe28-Jan-11 4:12 
QuestionUSB device detection upon program startup Pin
Blubbo27-Jan-11 9:51
Blubbo27-Jan-11 9:51 
AnswerRe: USB device detection upon program startup Pin
Luc Pattyn27-Jan-11 11:02
sitebuilderLuc Pattyn27-Jan-11 11:02 
GeneralRe: USB device detection upon program startup Pin
Blubbo27-Jan-11 16:46
Blubbo27-Jan-11 16:46 
AnswerRe: USB device detection upon program startup Pin
Luc Pattyn27-Jan-11 17:25
sitebuilderLuc Pattyn27-Jan-11 17:25 
Questionproblem with dynamic ips when using sockets. Pin
prasadbuddhika27-Jan-11 6:25
prasadbuddhika27-Jan-11 6:25 
AnswerRe: problem with dynamic ips when using sockets. Pin
Yusuf27-Jan-11 6:30
Yusuf27-Jan-11 6:30 
AnswerRe: problem with dynamic ips when using sockets. Pin
Richard MacCutchan27-Jan-11 7:15
mveRichard MacCutchan27-Jan-11 7:15 
GeneralRe: problem with dynamic ips when using sockets. Pin
prasadbuddhika27-Jan-11 19:23
prasadbuddhika27-Jan-11 19:23 
GeneralRe: problem with dynamic ips when using sockets. Pin
Richard MacCutchan27-Jan-11 22:45
mveRichard MacCutchan27-Jan-11 22:45 
AnswerRe: problem with dynamic ips when using sockets. Pin
jschell27-Jan-11 8:37
jschell27-Jan-11 8:37 
QuestionEquivalent way to achieve const or readonly return type from method Pin
bob1697227-Jan-11 5:09
bob1697227-Jan-11 5:09 
I'm not sure what the equivalent terminology would be for this but I'm looking for a way to achieve a way of returning a reference type from a method but preventing the user from modifying the public properties or mutators of that type (without some explicit casting away of const or whatever the equivalent approach might be in C#).

Basically, is there a way to at least state my intent in the code and maybe get some level of help from the compiler in discouraging any mutations on the object using that reference? I understand that nothing is fool proof but any assistance from the compiler in enforcing my intentions is always welcome to protect me from myself down the road when jacking with the code.

thanks.
AnswerRe: Equivalent way to achieve const or readonly return type from method Pin
_Erik_27-Jan-11 5:33
_Erik_27-Jan-11 5:33 
AnswerRe: Equivalent way to achieve const or readonly return type from method Pin
Luc Pattyn27-Jan-11 5:36
sitebuilderLuc Pattyn27-Jan-11 5:36 
AnswerRe: Equivalent way to achieve const or readonly return type from method Pin
jschell27-Jan-11 8:45
jschell27-Jan-11 8:45 
GeneralRe: Equivalent way to achieve const or readonly return type from method Pin
fjdiewornncalwe27-Jan-11 8:49
professionalfjdiewornncalwe27-Jan-11 8:49 
GeneralRe: Equivalent way to achieve const or readonly return type from method Pin
bob1697227-Jan-11 8:56
bob1697227-Jan-11 8:56 
AnswerRe: Equivalent way to achieve const or readonly return type from method Pin
RobCroll27-Jan-11 12:06
RobCroll27-Jan-11 12:06 
GeneralRe: Equivalent way to achieve const or readonly return type from method Pin
bob1697227-Jan-11 18:35
bob1697227-Jan-11 18:35 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.