|
I know that's not the end-result but very interessting, that J# is so unpopular.
I don't use J# (simply no need since there is C# and C++/CLR) and don't know anyone who does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would not call it an upgrade. I think Java is just as good as C#. Except for the EJB part of Java
I too haven't found a single J# developer and I wonder what would make someone use this language. I don't think you want to use J# just to migrate from java to C#. In that case it's better to jump over all at once.
WM.
What about weapons of mass-construction?
|
|
|
|
|
J# very useful tool, if you need convert some good library or application into C#.
Its easy 4 steps:
1. Create J# project from existing java-code.
2. Convert project from step1 into C#, all necessary tools for this job MS distributes.
3. Walk through errors by conversion report and fix problems.
4. Wipeout java-code for good.
Done!
|
|
|
|
|
It's my first time that I hear about J#. I guess it's a new programming language introcuded by MS?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
J++ came Visual Studio 6. Maybe in earlier versions too, but I don't know that. J# is the .NET version
Behind every great black man...
... is the police. - Conspiracy brother
Blog[^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
But only because I always use the "complete" installation option.
Grim (aka Toby) MCDBA, MCSD, MCP+SB
SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue IS NOT NULL
GO
(0 row(s) affected)
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I might accedently do it during an overnight complete installation... When I obtain my common sense again, I'll remove it as soon as I can.
Behind every great black man...
... is the police. - Conspiracy brother
Blog[^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: J# has some good very useful libraries as well. For example, in .NET BCL, there are'nt any direct zip/unzip libraries. However, using J#, you can use java.util.zip package.
Compression functionality[^] is available in the .NET 2.0 BCL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
really, I never do. It's a waste of MS dev's. They need to spend more time figuring out how to remove all javascript from web pages. IOW get Atlas out now.
|
|
|
|
|
It is all the simple JavaScript that adds more responsiveness to the web browser. Otherwise, we would be having plain vanilla HTML pages travelling up and down the Internet Pipe.
I do agree that Flash Movies are there. But how come we can be certain that these flash pages do the job that is expected of them transparently. Since everything is hidden from the user, there might be a code that can behind the scenes sniffing something in your filesystem.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
namespace LavanyaDeepak Personal Weblog The World of Deepak and Lavanya ViewPoint 24x7
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: Since everything is hidden from the user, there might be a code that can behind the scenes sniffing something in your filesystem.
Actually, Macromedia / Adobe have been total fascists about security in Flash - there's already plenty of resistance to Flash from traditional developers and usability people, so the last thing they want is to have to deal with security accusations as well.
More info here:
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=tn_16629
|
|
|
|
|
Actually with Atlas, they're not removing Javascript. They're adding more features to it.;P
regards,
Mircea
Many people spend their life going to sleep when they’re not sleepy and waking up while they still are.
|
|
|
|
|
No, since there is C# and C++/CLR there is simply no need for J#. That's my opinion, maybe other people think diferrent.
|
|
|
|
|
I would not want to be on that team, except for the leaning experience (and the pay).
I would like to know if MS paid the guy who invented the name C-Sharp (C#). He wrote a series of articles for ‘Dr Dobbs Journal’ (or was that the ‘C Users Journal’) on a DOS library call C-Sharp. Who he wrote it for does not matter now since the ‘C Users Journal’ became the ‘C/C++ Users Journal’ and has now been merged with the ‘Dr Dobbs Journal’. I only hope they are maintaining the CUJ library (public domain code submitted by readers, etc…), which included code from the CMP days.
INTP
"Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to show their absence."Edsger Dijkstra
|
|
|
|
|
So the main difference between J# and Vb.NET is that theres a lot more damn fools using vb.net?
All of the java programmers i deal with that have since moved to .NET (and yes, that happens, often these days even), all are pretty comfortable almost immediately with C#.
|
|
|
|
|
kevferron wrote:
So the main difference between J# and Vb.NET is that theres a lot more damn fools using vb.net?
Yup!
Never send a human to do a machine's job Agent Smith
|
|
|
|
|
Java developers embrace C#.
VB developers embrace...quess what?
Who's left ot embrace J#? And really, the question is why should they? What clear advantages it presents over C#?
regards,
Mircea
Many people spend their life going to sleep when they’re not sleepy and waking up while they still are.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, ok, OT I know. However, back in the Day before MS lost the lawsuit it was the best IDE I had ever worked with. Too bad they insisted on the ability to use COM. J#, what is that anyway? The 7th revision of C#? Bah. I have never actually known anyone to even discuss J#. I think I have seen a book on it in the book store, it looked lonely an unread.
"Until the day of his death, no man can be sure of his courage" -- Jean Anouilh
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 person answered not sure?
How the hell can you not be sure you program using J#?
Never send a human to do a machine's job Agent Smith
|
|
|
|
|
In the morning he clicks the icon "Editor", then he codes in the only programming we know, in the evening he closes "Editor". In an environment without titles, he doesn't have to know how the language is called...
_____________________________________________________________________________
I don't expect too much, all I want is your vote for Halbsichtigkeit.
|
|
|
|