|
Bob Stanneveld wrote: Do all laptop screens with this size have that limitation?
i think so, it is a hardware limitation...
TOXCCT >>> GEII power [toxcct][VisualCalc]
|
|
|
|
|
I use this size, because I prefer not to have to where my glasses when working. Higher resolutions would require larger fonts (for me), which defeats the purpose. At 1024x768 I can get my work done without eye strain and still reserve a about a third of the screen for other purposes, if needed.
INTP
Every thing is relative...
|
|
|
|
|
I use a rotated monitor for daily work .
|
|
|
|
|
the same here
1280 pxls vertically and 1024 horizontaly...
TOXCCT >>> GEII power [toxcct][VisualCalc]
|
|
|
|
|
|
leppie wrote: And not 1024 as that only does 75Hz where the aforementioned does 85Hz. I also find the aspect ratio of 1280 x 1024 a bit weird.
Absolutely! Screens set to 1280x1024 drive me nuts. All "standard" resolutions should be 4:3 on 4:3 monitors, or else you don't get square pixels.
I use 1280x960 at work at 1600x1200 at home.
|
|
|
|
|
1024x768 on laptop, no complains though.
plus, ppl should move on to LCD/Plasma/etc, monitors, good for eyes too.
-prakash
|
|
|
|